Cargando…

Adherence, safety, and satisfaction of a cardio-oncology rehabilitation program framework versus community exercise training for cancer survivors: findings from the CORE trial

PURPOSE: To assess safety, satisfaction, and overall adherence of a center-based cardiac rehabilitation (CBCR) program for cancer survivors at increased cardiovascular (CV) risk, compared to community-based exercise training (CBET). METHODS: The CORE study was a single-center, prospective, randomize...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Viamonte, Sofia Gonçalves, Joaquim, Ana, Alves, Alberto, Vilela, Eduardo, Capela, Andreia, Ferreira, Cristina, Costa, Ana João, Teixeira, Madalena, Duarte, Barbara, Rato, Nuno, Tavares, Aida, Santos, Mário, Ribeiro, Fernando
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9936479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36800020
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-023-07638-1
_version_ 1784890239015190528
author Viamonte, Sofia Gonçalves
Joaquim, Ana
Alves, Alberto
Vilela, Eduardo
Capela, Andreia
Ferreira, Cristina
Costa, Ana João
Teixeira, Madalena
Duarte, Barbara
Rato, Nuno
Tavares, Aida
Santos, Mário
Ribeiro, Fernando
author_facet Viamonte, Sofia Gonçalves
Joaquim, Ana
Alves, Alberto
Vilela, Eduardo
Capela, Andreia
Ferreira, Cristina
Costa, Ana João
Teixeira, Madalena
Duarte, Barbara
Rato, Nuno
Tavares, Aida
Santos, Mário
Ribeiro, Fernando
author_sort Viamonte, Sofia Gonçalves
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To assess safety, satisfaction, and overall adherence of a center-based cardiac rehabilitation (CBCR) program for cancer survivors at increased cardiovascular (CV) risk, compared to community-based exercise training (CBET). METHODS: The CORE study was a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial enrolling cancer survivors exposed to cardiotoxic cancer treatment and/or with previous CV disease. Participants were randomized to an 8-week CBCR program or CBET, twice a week. Overall feasibility (consent, retention, and completion rates), intervention adherence (percentage of exercise sessions attended), and safety were assessed. Adverse events (AEs) were registered, and participants’ satisfaction was measured at the end of the study. RESULTS: Eighty out of 116 potentially eligible individuals were included; consent rate was 72.4%, and 77 (96.2%) started the study (retention rate 100% in CBCR vs 92.5% in CBET); completion rate was 92.5%. Intervention adherence was higher in CBCR (90.3 ± 11.8% vs 68.4 ± 22.1%, p < 0.001). Exercise-related AEs were mainly related to musculoskeletal conditions in both groups (7 in CBCR vs 20 in CBET, p < 0.001), accounting for exercise prescription modification in 47 sessions (18 (3.3%) in CBCR vs 29 (7.2%) in CBET, p = 0.006), none motivating exercise discontinuation. No participants reported major CV events. Overall, the satisfaction with the different aspects of the programs (e.g., expectations, monitoring) was higher in the CBCR. CONCLUSION: This exploratory analysis of the CORE trial suggests that both exercise-based interventions are feasible and safe in this setting. The higher intervention adherence and patient satisfaction in CBCR suggest that this comprehensive approach could be of interest in this population. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00520-023-07638-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9936479
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99364792023-02-17 Adherence, safety, and satisfaction of a cardio-oncology rehabilitation program framework versus community exercise training for cancer survivors: findings from the CORE trial Viamonte, Sofia Gonçalves Joaquim, Ana Alves, Alberto Vilela, Eduardo Capela, Andreia Ferreira, Cristina Costa, Ana João Teixeira, Madalena Duarte, Barbara Rato, Nuno Tavares, Aida Santos, Mário Ribeiro, Fernando Support Care Cancer Research PURPOSE: To assess safety, satisfaction, and overall adherence of a center-based cardiac rehabilitation (CBCR) program for cancer survivors at increased cardiovascular (CV) risk, compared to community-based exercise training (CBET). METHODS: The CORE study was a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial enrolling cancer survivors exposed to cardiotoxic cancer treatment and/or with previous CV disease. Participants were randomized to an 8-week CBCR program or CBET, twice a week. Overall feasibility (consent, retention, and completion rates), intervention adherence (percentage of exercise sessions attended), and safety were assessed. Adverse events (AEs) were registered, and participants’ satisfaction was measured at the end of the study. RESULTS: Eighty out of 116 potentially eligible individuals were included; consent rate was 72.4%, and 77 (96.2%) started the study (retention rate 100% in CBCR vs 92.5% in CBET); completion rate was 92.5%. Intervention adherence was higher in CBCR (90.3 ± 11.8% vs 68.4 ± 22.1%, p < 0.001). Exercise-related AEs were mainly related to musculoskeletal conditions in both groups (7 in CBCR vs 20 in CBET, p < 0.001), accounting for exercise prescription modification in 47 sessions (18 (3.3%) in CBCR vs 29 (7.2%) in CBET, p = 0.006), none motivating exercise discontinuation. No participants reported major CV events. Overall, the satisfaction with the different aspects of the programs (e.g., expectations, monitoring) was higher in the CBCR. CONCLUSION: This exploratory analysis of the CORE trial suggests that both exercise-based interventions are feasible and safe in this setting. The higher intervention adherence and patient satisfaction in CBCR suggest that this comprehensive approach could be of interest in this population. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00520-023-07638-1. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-02-17 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9936479/ /pubmed/36800020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-023-07638-1 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2023, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Research
Viamonte, Sofia Gonçalves
Joaquim, Ana
Alves, Alberto
Vilela, Eduardo
Capela, Andreia
Ferreira, Cristina
Costa, Ana João
Teixeira, Madalena
Duarte, Barbara
Rato, Nuno
Tavares, Aida
Santos, Mário
Ribeiro, Fernando
Adherence, safety, and satisfaction of a cardio-oncology rehabilitation program framework versus community exercise training for cancer survivors: findings from the CORE trial
title Adherence, safety, and satisfaction of a cardio-oncology rehabilitation program framework versus community exercise training for cancer survivors: findings from the CORE trial
title_full Adherence, safety, and satisfaction of a cardio-oncology rehabilitation program framework versus community exercise training for cancer survivors: findings from the CORE trial
title_fullStr Adherence, safety, and satisfaction of a cardio-oncology rehabilitation program framework versus community exercise training for cancer survivors: findings from the CORE trial
title_full_unstemmed Adherence, safety, and satisfaction of a cardio-oncology rehabilitation program framework versus community exercise training for cancer survivors: findings from the CORE trial
title_short Adherence, safety, and satisfaction of a cardio-oncology rehabilitation program framework versus community exercise training for cancer survivors: findings from the CORE trial
title_sort adherence, safety, and satisfaction of a cardio-oncology rehabilitation program framework versus community exercise training for cancer survivors: findings from the core trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9936479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36800020
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-023-07638-1
work_keys_str_mv AT viamontesofiagoncalves adherencesafetyandsatisfactionofacardiooncologyrehabilitationprogramframeworkversuscommunityexercisetrainingforcancersurvivorsfindingsfromthecoretrial
AT joaquimana adherencesafetyandsatisfactionofacardiooncologyrehabilitationprogramframeworkversuscommunityexercisetrainingforcancersurvivorsfindingsfromthecoretrial
AT alvesalberto adherencesafetyandsatisfactionofacardiooncologyrehabilitationprogramframeworkversuscommunityexercisetrainingforcancersurvivorsfindingsfromthecoretrial
AT vilelaeduardo adherencesafetyandsatisfactionofacardiooncologyrehabilitationprogramframeworkversuscommunityexercisetrainingforcancersurvivorsfindingsfromthecoretrial
AT capelaandreia adherencesafetyandsatisfactionofacardiooncologyrehabilitationprogramframeworkversuscommunityexercisetrainingforcancersurvivorsfindingsfromthecoretrial
AT ferreiracristina adherencesafetyandsatisfactionofacardiooncologyrehabilitationprogramframeworkversuscommunityexercisetrainingforcancersurvivorsfindingsfromthecoretrial
AT costaanajoao adherencesafetyandsatisfactionofacardiooncologyrehabilitationprogramframeworkversuscommunityexercisetrainingforcancersurvivorsfindingsfromthecoretrial
AT teixeiramadalena adherencesafetyandsatisfactionofacardiooncologyrehabilitationprogramframeworkversuscommunityexercisetrainingforcancersurvivorsfindingsfromthecoretrial
AT duartebarbara adherencesafetyandsatisfactionofacardiooncologyrehabilitationprogramframeworkversuscommunityexercisetrainingforcancersurvivorsfindingsfromthecoretrial
AT ratonuno adherencesafetyandsatisfactionofacardiooncologyrehabilitationprogramframeworkversuscommunityexercisetrainingforcancersurvivorsfindingsfromthecoretrial
AT tavaresaida adherencesafetyandsatisfactionofacardiooncologyrehabilitationprogramframeworkversuscommunityexercisetrainingforcancersurvivorsfindingsfromthecoretrial
AT santosmario adherencesafetyandsatisfactionofacardiooncologyrehabilitationprogramframeworkversuscommunityexercisetrainingforcancersurvivorsfindingsfromthecoretrial
AT ribeirofernando adherencesafetyandsatisfactionofacardiooncologyrehabilitationprogramframeworkversuscommunityexercisetrainingforcancersurvivorsfindingsfromthecoretrial