Cargando…

Foley catheter plus misoprostol versus misoprostol alone for labor induction

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to analyze the effects of Foley catheter combined with misoprostol in the labor induction process. METHODS: This is a nonblinded, block randomized, controlled trial that compared the association between transcervical Foley catheter/vaginal misoprostol 25 μg combination an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Elpo, Jhonathan Alcides, Araújo, Bruna de Aguiar, Volpato, Lia Karina
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Associação Médica Brasileira 2023
Materias:	Original Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9937608/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36629651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.20220897

Ejemplares similares

Comparison of Intracervical Foley’s Catheter With Vaginal Misoprostol Versus Intravaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor
por: Kadu, Nivedita A, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Foley Catheter versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Labour Induction
por: Noor, Nasreen, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Comparison of Vaginal Misoprostol with Foley Catheter for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor
por: Vahid Roudsari, Fatemeh, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Labor induction with combined low-dose oral misoprostol and Foley catheter vs oral misoprostol alone at term gestation—a randomized study
por: Anjali, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Effect of extra-amniotic Foley’s catheter and vaginal misoprostol versus vaginal misoprostol alone on cervical ripening and induction of labor in Kenya, a randomized controlled trial
por: Osoti, Alfred, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Intracervical Foley Catheter Plus Intravaginal Misoprostol vs Intravaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening: A Meta-Analysis
por: Lee, Howard Hao, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The Induction with Foley OR Misoprostol (INFORM) Study dataset. A dataset of 602 women with hypertensive disease in pregnancy, in India, randomised to either Foley catheter or oral misoprostol for induction of labour
por: Mundle, Shuchita, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Induction of labour with sequential double-balloon catheter and oral misoprostol versus oral misoprostol alone in obese women
por: Kehl, Sven, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

A comparison between induction of labor with 3 methods of titrated oral misoprostol, constant dose of oral misoprostol and Foley catheter with extra amniotic saline infusion (EASI), in women with unfavorable cervix
por: Kashanian, Maryam, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Sublingual misoprostol vs. oral misoprostol solution for induction of labor: A retrospective study
por: Amini, Mahdi, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Pharmacokinetics of vaginal versus buccal misoprostol for labor induction at term
por: Vorontsova, Yana, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Induction of labour in pre-eclamptic women: a randomised trial comparing the Foley balloon catheter with oral misoprostol
por: Bracken, Hillary, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Labor Induction with Intravaginal Misoprostol versus Spontaneous Labor: Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes
por: Ozbasli, Esra, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Oral misoprostol, low dose vaginal misoprostol, and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: Randomized controlled trial
por: Young, David C., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Can the Induction of Labor with Misoprostol Increase Maternal Blood Loss?
por: Souza, Paulo César Praciano, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Mifepristone and Misoprostol vs Misoprostol Alone in Second Trimester Termination of Pregnancy
por: Shah, Deepa, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Sublingual Misoprostol versus Foley catheter for cervical ripening in women with preeclampsia or gestational hypertension: A randomized control trial
por: Ayati, Sedigheh, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical Foley catheter for cervical ripening in postdate primigravid women: a randomized clinical trial
por: Abdi, Nazanin, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Induction of labour with a Foley catheter or oral misoprostol at term: the PROBAAT-II study, a multicentre randomised controlled trial
por: ten Eikelder, Mieke LG, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Induction to delivery interval using transcervical Foley catheter plus oxytocin and vaginal misoprostol: A comparative study at Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital, Kano, Nigeria
por: Garba, Ibrahim, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Comparison of mifepristone plus misoprostol with misoprostol alone for first trimester medical abortion: A systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Shimels, Tariku, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Induction of Labor using Misoprostol in a Tertiary Hospital in the Southeast of Brazil
por: Silva, Tácito Augusto Godoy, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Labor induction with randomized comparison of cervical, oral and intravaginal misoprostol
por: Dadashaliha, Masoumeh, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Misoprostol vaginal insert versus misoprostol vaginal tablets for the induction of labour: a cohort study
por: Bolla, Daniele, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Correction: Induction of labour with a Foley catheter or oral misoprostol at term: the PROBAAT-II study, a multicentre randomised controlled trial
por: ten Eikelder, Mieke LG, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

A comparison of misoprostol vaginal insert and misoprostol vaginal tablets for induction of labor in nulliparous women: a retrospective cohort study
por: Marsdal, Kjersti Engen, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

A pilot study to compare propranolol and misoprostol versus misoprostol and placebo for induction of labor in primigravidae; a randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled trial
por: Abdel Hamid, Ahmed Sherif, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Role of Combination OF Mifepristone and Misoprostol Verses Misoprostol alone in Induction of Labour in Late Intrauterin Fetal Death: A Prospective Study
por: Panda, Subrat, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Oral Misoprostol alone versus oral misoprostol followed by oxytocin for labour induction in women with hypertension in pregnancy (MOLI): protocol for a randomised controlled trial
por: Bracken, Hillary, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Labor Induction with Orally Administrated Misoprostol: A Retrospective Cohort Study
por: Wallstrom, Tove, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Survey of Provider Preferences Regarding the Route of Misoprostol for Induction of Labor at Term
por: Towns, Rachel, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Medication Abortion Safety and Effectiveness With Misoprostol Alone
por: Jayaweera, Ruvani, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Effect of delayed misoprostol dosing interval for induction of labor: a retrospective study
por: Harman Crowell, Elizabeth H., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Induction of Labor in Primigravid Term Pregnancy with Misoprostol or Dinoprostone: A Comparative Study
por: Arif, Rizwana, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Outpatient vs inpatient induction of labor with oral misoprostol: A retrospective study
por: Hallén, Natalie, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

The Efficacy of Misoprostol Vaginal Inserts for Induction of Labor in Women with Very Unfavorable Cervices
por: Socha, Maciej W., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Outcome of misoprostol and oxytocin in induction of labour
por: Acharya, Trishna, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Mifepristone and misoprostol versus misoprostol alone for the management of missed miscarriage (MifeMiso): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
por: Chu, Justin J, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Intravaginal Isoniazid (INH) and Sublingual Misoprostol Versus Sublingual Misoprostol Alone for First-Trimester Induced Abortion: A Randomized Controlled Trial
por: Haghighi, Ladan, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Comparison Between Effect of Letrozole Plus Misoprostol and Misoprostol Alone in Terminating Non-Viable First Trimester Pregnancies: A Single Blind Randomized Trial
por: Abbasalizadeh, Fatemeh, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_rpbmlv465hs9n71jbgvmc78fp6