Cargando…

Comparison of midazolam versus captopril in patients with uncomplicated hypertensive urgency in emergency ward: Double-blind randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND: The urgency of uncomplicated blood pressure (BP) is known as a sudden rise in BP. The aim of this study was to evaluate the intravascular administration of midazolam as an emergency care to control BP against captopril in patients with uncomplicated hypertension (HTN). METHODS: The prese...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khorsand, Mohammad Reza, Enayatrad, Mostafa, Yekesadat, Seyed Meysam, Khodayar, Maryam, Noyani, Amir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9937673/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36817344
http://dx.doi.org/10.48305/arya.2022.26128
_version_ 1784890474947936256
author Khorsand, Mohammad Reza
Enayatrad, Mostafa
Yekesadat, Seyed Meysam
Khodayar, Maryam
Noyani, Amir
author_facet Khorsand, Mohammad Reza
Enayatrad, Mostafa
Yekesadat, Seyed Meysam
Khodayar, Maryam
Noyani, Amir
author_sort Khorsand, Mohammad Reza
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The urgency of uncomplicated blood pressure (BP) is known as a sudden rise in BP. The aim of this study was to evaluate the intravascular administration of midazolam as an emergency care to control BP against captopril in patients with uncomplicated hypertension (HTN). METHODS: The present study was a double-blind parallel randomized clinical trial (RCT) study that was performed on patients with urgent HTN referred to Imam Hossein Hospital in Shahroud, Iran, in 2018. Patients with BP higher than 180/110 mmHg and with healthy vital organs were selected randomly and allocated into three groups of 43 participants. All patients’ BP in both arms, and after a period of 10 minutes in the left arm, was checked and after administering the medication was checked again for 4 times of 15 minutes till 1 hour complete. RESULTS: There were significant differences between systolic (P = 0.024), diastolic (P = 0.001), and mean BP (P = 0.009) in the midazolam group before and after treatment. The group of midazolam and captopril showed the greatest reduction of BP before, in the middle, and after carrying out the treatment methods. As such, systolic, diastolic, and mean BP showed 23.5% (P = 0.047), 17.4% (P = 0.021), and 20.5% (P = 0.031) reduction, respectively. CONCLUSION: Midazolam can be used as an effective and low-risk drug for lowering BP. Midazolam also has a faster effect on lowering BP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9937673
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99376732023-02-18 Comparison of midazolam versus captopril in patients with uncomplicated hypertensive urgency in emergency ward: Double-blind randomized clinical trial Khorsand, Mohammad Reza Enayatrad, Mostafa Yekesadat, Seyed Meysam Khodayar, Maryam Noyani, Amir ARYA Atheroscler Original Article BACKGROUND: The urgency of uncomplicated blood pressure (BP) is known as a sudden rise in BP. The aim of this study was to evaluate the intravascular administration of midazolam as an emergency care to control BP against captopril in patients with uncomplicated hypertension (HTN). METHODS: The present study was a double-blind parallel randomized clinical trial (RCT) study that was performed on patients with urgent HTN referred to Imam Hossein Hospital in Shahroud, Iran, in 2018. Patients with BP higher than 180/110 mmHg and with healthy vital organs were selected randomly and allocated into three groups of 43 participants. All patients’ BP in both arms, and after a period of 10 minutes in the left arm, was checked and after administering the medication was checked again for 4 times of 15 minutes till 1 hour complete. RESULTS: There were significant differences between systolic (P = 0.024), diastolic (P = 0.001), and mean BP (P = 0.009) in the midazolam group before and after treatment. The group of midazolam and captopril showed the greatest reduction of BP before, in the middle, and after carrying out the treatment methods. As such, systolic, diastolic, and mean BP showed 23.5% (P = 0.047), 17.4% (P = 0.021), and 20.5% (P = 0.031) reduction, respectively. CONCLUSION: Midazolam can be used as an effective and low-risk drug for lowering BP. Midazolam also has a faster effect on lowering BP. Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences 2022-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9937673/ /pubmed/36817344 http://dx.doi.org/10.48305/arya.2022.26128 Text en © 2022 Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center & Isfahan University of Medical Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.
spellingShingle Original Article
Khorsand, Mohammad Reza
Enayatrad, Mostafa
Yekesadat, Seyed Meysam
Khodayar, Maryam
Noyani, Amir
Comparison of midazolam versus captopril in patients with uncomplicated hypertensive urgency in emergency ward: Double-blind randomized clinical trial
title Comparison of midazolam versus captopril in patients with uncomplicated hypertensive urgency in emergency ward: Double-blind randomized clinical trial
title_full Comparison of midazolam versus captopril in patients with uncomplicated hypertensive urgency in emergency ward: Double-blind randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Comparison of midazolam versus captopril in patients with uncomplicated hypertensive urgency in emergency ward: Double-blind randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of midazolam versus captopril in patients with uncomplicated hypertensive urgency in emergency ward: Double-blind randomized clinical trial
title_short Comparison of midazolam versus captopril in patients with uncomplicated hypertensive urgency in emergency ward: Double-blind randomized clinical trial
title_sort comparison of midazolam versus captopril in patients with uncomplicated hypertensive urgency in emergency ward: double-blind randomized clinical trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9937673/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36817344
http://dx.doi.org/10.48305/arya.2022.26128
work_keys_str_mv AT khorsandmohammadreza comparisonofmidazolamversuscaptoprilinpatientswithuncomplicatedhypertensiveurgencyinemergencywarddoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT enayatradmostafa comparisonofmidazolamversuscaptoprilinpatientswithuncomplicatedhypertensiveurgencyinemergencywarddoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT yekesadatseyedmeysam comparisonofmidazolamversuscaptoprilinpatientswithuncomplicatedhypertensiveurgencyinemergencywarddoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT khodayarmaryam comparisonofmidazolamversuscaptoprilinpatientswithuncomplicatedhypertensiveurgencyinemergencywarddoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT noyaniamir comparisonofmidazolamversuscaptoprilinpatientswithuncomplicatedhypertensiveurgencyinemergencywarddoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial