Cargando…
Comparison of midazolam versus captopril in patients with uncomplicated hypertensive urgency in emergency ward: Double-blind randomized clinical trial
BACKGROUND: The urgency of uncomplicated blood pressure (BP) is known as a sudden rise in BP. The aim of this study was to evaluate the intravascular administration of midazolam as an emergency care to control BP against captopril in patients with uncomplicated hypertension (HTN). METHODS: The prese...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9937673/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36817344 http://dx.doi.org/10.48305/arya.2022.26128 |
_version_ | 1784890474947936256 |
---|---|
author | Khorsand, Mohammad Reza Enayatrad, Mostafa Yekesadat, Seyed Meysam Khodayar, Maryam Noyani, Amir |
author_facet | Khorsand, Mohammad Reza Enayatrad, Mostafa Yekesadat, Seyed Meysam Khodayar, Maryam Noyani, Amir |
author_sort | Khorsand, Mohammad Reza |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The urgency of uncomplicated blood pressure (BP) is known as a sudden rise in BP. The aim of this study was to evaluate the intravascular administration of midazolam as an emergency care to control BP against captopril in patients with uncomplicated hypertension (HTN). METHODS: The present study was a double-blind parallel randomized clinical trial (RCT) study that was performed on patients with urgent HTN referred to Imam Hossein Hospital in Shahroud, Iran, in 2018. Patients with BP higher than 180/110 mmHg and with healthy vital organs were selected randomly and allocated into three groups of 43 participants. All patients’ BP in both arms, and after a period of 10 minutes in the left arm, was checked and after administering the medication was checked again for 4 times of 15 minutes till 1 hour complete. RESULTS: There were significant differences between systolic (P = 0.024), diastolic (P = 0.001), and mean BP (P = 0.009) in the midazolam group before and after treatment. The group of midazolam and captopril showed the greatest reduction of BP before, in the middle, and after carrying out the treatment methods. As such, systolic, diastolic, and mean BP showed 23.5% (P = 0.047), 17.4% (P = 0.021), and 20.5% (P = 0.031) reduction, respectively. CONCLUSION: Midazolam can be used as an effective and low-risk drug for lowering BP. Midazolam also has a faster effect on lowering BP. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9937673 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99376732023-02-18 Comparison of midazolam versus captopril in patients with uncomplicated hypertensive urgency in emergency ward: Double-blind randomized clinical trial Khorsand, Mohammad Reza Enayatrad, Mostafa Yekesadat, Seyed Meysam Khodayar, Maryam Noyani, Amir ARYA Atheroscler Original Article BACKGROUND: The urgency of uncomplicated blood pressure (BP) is known as a sudden rise in BP. The aim of this study was to evaluate the intravascular administration of midazolam as an emergency care to control BP against captopril in patients with uncomplicated hypertension (HTN). METHODS: The present study was a double-blind parallel randomized clinical trial (RCT) study that was performed on patients with urgent HTN referred to Imam Hossein Hospital in Shahroud, Iran, in 2018. Patients with BP higher than 180/110 mmHg and with healthy vital organs were selected randomly and allocated into three groups of 43 participants. All patients’ BP in both arms, and after a period of 10 minutes in the left arm, was checked and after administering the medication was checked again for 4 times of 15 minutes till 1 hour complete. RESULTS: There were significant differences between systolic (P = 0.024), diastolic (P = 0.001), and mean BP (P = 0.009) in the midazolam group before and after treatment. The group of midazolam and captopril showed the greatest reduction of BP before, in the middle, and after carrying out the treatment methods. As such, systolic, diastolic, and mean BP showed 23.5% (P = 0.047), 17.4% (P = 0.021), and 20.5% (P = 0.031) reduction, respectively. CONCLUSION: Midazolam can be used as an effective and low-risk drug for lowering BP. Midazolam also has a faster effect on lowering BP. Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences 2022-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9937673/ /pubmed/36817344 http://dx.doi.org/10.48305/arya.2022.26128 Text en © 2022 Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center & Isfahan University of Medical Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Khorsand, Mohammad Reza Enayatrad, Mostafa Yekesadat, Seyed Meysam Khodayar, Maryam Noyani, Amir Comparison of midazolam versus captopril in patients with uncomplicated hypertensive urgency in emergency ward: Double-blind randomized clinical trial |
title | Comparison of midazolam versus captopril in patients with uncomplicated hypertensive urgency in emergency ward: Double-blind randomized clinical trial |
title_full | Comparison of midazolam versus captopril in patients with uncomplicated hypertensive urgency in emergency ward: Double-blind randomized clinical trial |
title_fullStr | Comparison of midazolam versus captopril in patients with uncomplicated hypertensive urgency in emergency ward: Double-blind randomized clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of midazolam versus captopril in patients with uncomplicated hypertensive urgency in emergency ward: Double-blind randomized clinical trial |
title_short | Comparison of midazolam versus captopril in patients with uncomplicated hypertensive urgency in emergency ward: Double-blind randomized clinical trial |
title_sort | comparison of midazolam versus captopril in patients with uncomplicated hypertensive urgency in emergency ward: double-blind randomized clinical trial |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9937673/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36817344 http://dx.doi.org/10.48305/arya.2022.26128 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT khorsandmohammadreza comparisonofmidazolamversuscaptoprilinpatientswithuncomplicatedhypertensiveurgencyinemergencywarddoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial AT enayatradmostafa comparisonofmidazolamversuscaptoprilinpatientswithuncomplicatedhypertensiveurgencyinemergencywarddoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial AT yekesadatseyedmeysam comparisonofmidazolamversuscaptoprilinpatientswithuncomplicatedhypertensiveurgencyinemergencywarddoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial AT khodayarmaryam comparisonofmidazolamversuscaptoprilinpatientswithuncomplicatedhypertensiveurgencyinemergencywarddoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial AT noyaniamir comparisonofmidazolamversuscaptoprilinpatientswithuncomplicatedhypertensiveurgencyinemergencywarddoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial |