Cargando…

Pedicled buccal flaps as a backup procedure for intraoral reconstruction

BACKGROUND: Intraoral soft tissue deficiency and impaired wound beds are common problems after cleft and tumour surgery or after dental trauma. Frequently, limited defects are overtreated with extensive microvascular reconstruction procedures, but pedicled flaps remain useful, as they are simple to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Frohwitter, Gesche, Kesting, Marco R., Rau, Andrea, Weber, Manuel, Baran, Christoph, Nobis, Christopher-Philipp, Buentemeyer, Tjark-Ole, Preidl, Raimund, Lutz, Rainer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9938028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35072841
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10006-022-01040-7
_version_ 1784890551558995968
author Frohwitter, Gesche
Kesting, Marco R.
Rau, Andrea
Weber, Manuel
Baran, Christoph
Nobis, Christopher-Philipp
Buentemeyer, Tjark-Ole
Preidl, Raimund
Lutz, Rainer
author_facet Frohwitter, Gesche
Kesting, Marco R.
Rau, Andrea
Weber, Manuel
Baran, Christoph
Nobis, Christopher-Philipp
Buentemeyer, Tjark-Ole
Preidl, Raimund
Lutz, Rainer
author_sort Frohwitter, Gesche
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Intraoral soft tissue deficiency and impaired wound beds are common problems after cleft and tumour surgery or after dental trauma. Frequently, limited defects are overtreated with extensive microvascular reconstruction procedures, but pedicled flaps remain useful, as they are simple to harvest, and they provide a reliable outcome. The buccal flap, first described in the 1970s, has been used for palatine lengthening in cleft patients over decades. In the following, we present an expanded indication in cases of palatal fistula, complex vestibulum, exposed bone in orthognathic surgery, and osteoradionecrosis. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review and report on all buccal flaps harvested in our department within the last 3 years with a follow-up period of at least half a year after flap surgery. Patients of all age groups and treatment indications in which a buccal flap was used were implicated in the evaluation. RESULTS: Sixteen buccal flaps were performed in 10 patients. The median age at the time of surgery was 42 years, reaching from 12 up to 66 years. Fourteen buccal flaps were used for upper jaw or palatal coverage; two buccal flaps were used in the mandible. In terms of complications (four flaps; 25%), there were two partial flap failures, one wound dehiscence and one wound dehiscence. There were no failures of the remaining mucosal flap islands after pedicle dissection. CONCLUSION: The buccal flap is a reliable and straightforward approach to challenging intraoral wound beds with soft tissue deficiency. We thoroughly discuss the additional indications for buccal flap surgery, describe the harvest technique, and provide strategies to prevent intra- and postoperative complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9938028
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99380282023-02-19 Pedicled buccal flaps as a backup procedure for intraoral reconstruction Frohwitter, Gesche Kesting, Marco R. Rau, Andrea Weber, Manuel Baran, Christoph Nobis, Christopher-Philipp Buentemeyer, Tjark-Ole Preidl, Raimund Lutz, Rainer Oral Maxillofac Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Intraoral soft tissue deficiency and impaired wound beds are common problems after cleft and tumour surgery or after dental trauma. Frequently, limited defects are overtreated with extensive microvascular reconstruction procedures, but pedicled flaps remain useful, as they are simple to harvest, and they provide a reliable outcome. The buccal flap, first described in the 1970s, has been used for palatine lengthening in cleft patients over decades. In the following, we present an expanded indication in cases of palatal fistula, complex vestibulum, exposed bone in orthognathic surgery, and osteoradionecrosis. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review and report on all buccal flaps harvested in our department within the last 3 years with a follow-up period of at least half a year after flap surgery. Patients of all age groups and treatment indications in which a buccal flap was used were implicated in the evaluation. RESULTS: Sixteen buccal flaps were performed in 10 patients. The median age at the time of surgery was 42 years, reaching from 12 up to 66 years. Fourteen buccal flaps were used for upper jaw or palatal coverage; two buccal flaps were used in the mandible. In terms of complications (four flaps; 25%), there were two partial flap failures, one wound dehiscence and one wound dehiscence. There were no failures of the remaining mucosal flap islands after pedicle dissection. CONCLUSION: The buccal flap is a reliable and straightforward approach to challenging intraoral wound beds with soft tissue deficiency. We thoroughly discuss the additional indications for buccal flap surgery, describe the harvest technique, and provide strategies to prevent intra- and postoperative complications. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-01-24 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9938028/ /pubmed/35072841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10006-022-01040-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Frohwitter, Gesche
Kesting, Marco R.
Rau, Andrea
Weber, Manuel
Baran, Christoph
Nobis, Christopher-Philipp
Buentemeyer, Tjark-Ole
Preidl, Raimund
Lutz, Rainer
Pedicled buccal flaps as a backup procedure for intraoral reconstruction
title Pedicled buccal flaps as a backup procedure for intraoral reconstruction
title_full Pedicled buccal flaps as a backup procedure for intraoral reconstruction
title_fullStr Pedicled buccal flaps as a backup procedure for intraoral reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Pedicled buccal flaps as a backup procedure for intraoral reconstruction
title_short Pedicled buccal flaps as a backup procedure for intraoral reconstruction
title_sort pedicled buccal flaps as a backup procedure for intraoral reconstruction
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9938028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35072841
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10006-022-01040-7
work_keys_str_mv AT frohwittergesche pedicledbuccalflapsasabackupprocedureforintraoralreconstruction
AT kestingmarcor pedicledbuccalflapsasabackupprocedureforintraoralreconstruction
AT rauandrea pedicledbuccalflapsasabackupprocedureforintraoralreconstruction
AT webermanuel pedicledbuccalflapsasabackupprocedureforintraoralreconstruction
AT baranchristoph pedicledbuccalflapsasabackupprocedureforintraoralreconstruction
AT nobischristopherphilipp pedicledbuccalflapsasabackupprocedureforintraoralreconstruction
AT buentemeyertjarkole pedicledbuccalflapsasabackupprocedureforintraoralreconstruction
AT preidlraimund pedicledbuccalflapsasabackupprocedureforintraoralreconstruction
AT lutzrainer pedicledbuccalflapsasabackupprocedureforintraoralreconstruction