Cargando…

Research Buddy partnership in a MD–PhD program: lessons learned

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There is increasing recognition of the importance of patient involvement in research. In recent years, there has also been growing interest in patient partnerships with doctoral studies students. However, it can be difficult to know where to start and how to go about such involv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gould, Daniel J., Glanville-Hearst, Marion, Bunzli, Samantha, Choong, Peter F. M., Dowsey, Michelle M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9938357/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36803954
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-023-00414-9
_version_ 1784890610452267008
author Gould, Daniel J.
Glanville-Hearst, Marion
Bunzli, Samantha
Choong, Peter F. M.
Dowsey, Michelle M.
author_facet Gould, Daniel J.
Glanville-Hearst, Marion
Bunzli, Samantha
Choong, Peter F. M.
Dowsey, Michelle M.
author_sort Gould, Daniel J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There is increasing recognition of the importance of patient involvement in research. In recent years, there has also been growing interest in patient partnerships with doctoral studies students. However, it can be difficult to know where to start and how to go about such involvement activities. The purpose of this perspective piece was to share experiential insight of the experience of a patient involvement program such that others can learn from this experience. BODY: This is a co-authored perspective piece centred on the experience of MGH, a patient who has had hip replacement surgery, and DG, a medical student completing a PhD, participating in a Research Buddy partnership over the course of over 3 years. The context in which this partnership took place was also described to facilitate comparison with readers’ own circumstances and contexts. DG and MGH met regularly to discuss, and work together on, various aspects of DG’s PhD research project. Reflexive thematic analysis was conducted on reflections from DG and MGH regarding their experience in the Research Buddy program to synthesise nine lessons which were then corroborated with reference to published literature on patient involvement in research. These lessons were: learn from experience; tailor the program; get involved early; embrace uniqueness; meet regularly; build rapport; ensure mutual benefit; broad involvement; regularly reflect and review. CONCLUSIONS: In this perspective piece, a patient and a medical student completing a PhD reflected upon their experience co-designing a Research Buddy partnership within a patient involvement program. A series of nine lessons was identified and presented to inform readers seeking to develop or enhance their own patient involvement programs. Researcher-patient rapport is foundational to all other aspects of the patient’s involvement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9938357
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99383572023-02-19 Research Buddy partnership in a MD–PhD program: lessons learned Gould, Daniel J. Glanville-Hearst, Marion Bunzli, Samantha Choong, Peter F. M. Dowsey, Michelle M. Res Involv Engagem Comment BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There is increasing recognition of the importance of patient involvement in research. In recent years, there has also been growing interest in patient partnerships with doctoral studies students. However, it can be difficult to know where to start and how to go about such involvement activities. The purpose of this perspective piece was to share experiential insight of the experience of a patient involvement program such that others can learn from this experience. BODY: This is a co-authored perspective piece centred on the experience of MGH, a patient who has had hip replacement surgery, and DG, a medical student completing a PhD, participating in a Research Buddy partnership over the course of over 3 years. The context in which this partnership took place was also described to facilitate comparison with readers’ own circumstances and contexts. DG and MGH met regularly to discuss, and work together on, various aspects of DG’s PhD research project. Reflexive thematic analysis was conducted on reflections from DG and MGH regarding their experience in the Research Buddy program to synthesise nine lessons which were then corroborated with reference to published literature on patient involvement in research. These lessons were: learn from experience; tailor the program; get involved early; embrace uniqueness; meet regularly; build rapport; ensure mutual benefit; broad involvement; regularly reflect and review. CONCLUSIONS: In this perspective piece, a patient and a medical student completing a PhD reflected upon their experience co-designing a Research Buddy partnership within a patient involvement program. A series of nine lessons was identified and presented to inform readers seeking to develop or enhance their own patient involvement programs. Researcher-patient rapport is foundational to all other aspects of the patient’s involvement. BioMed Central 2023-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9938357/ /pubmed/36803954 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-023-00414-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Comment
Gould, Daniel J.
Glanville-Hearst, Marion
Bunzli, Samantha
Choong, Peter F. M.
Dowsey, Michelle M.
Research Buddy partnership in a MD–PhD program: lessons learned
title Research Buddy partnership in a MD–PhD program: lessons learned
title_full Research Buddy partnership in a MD–PhD program: lessons learned
title_fullStr Research Buddy partnership in a MD–PhD program: lessons learned
title_full_unstemmed Research Buddy partnership in a MD–PhD program: lessons learned
title_short Research Buddy partnership in a MD–PhD program: lessons learned
title_sort research buddy partnership in a md–phd program: lessons learned
topic Comment
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9938357/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36803954
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-023-00414-9
work_keys_str_mv AT goulddanielj researchbuddypartnershipinamdphdprogramlessonslearned
AT glanvillehearstmarion researchbuddypartnershipinamdphdprogramlessonslearned
AT bunzlisamantha researchbuddypartnershipinamdphdprogramlessonslearned
AT choongpeterfm researchbuddypartnershipinamdphdprogramlessonslearned
AT dowseymichellem researchbuddypartnershipinamdphdprogramlessonslearned