Cargando…

Does the intraoperative 3D-flat panel control of the planned implant position lead to an optimization and increased in safety in the anatomically demanding region C1/2?

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the applicability and advantages of intraoperative imaging using a 3D flat panel in the treatment of C1/2 instabilities. MATERIALS: Prospective single-centered study including surgeries at the upper cervical spine between 06/2016 and 12/2018. Intraop...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jarvers, J.-S., Spiegl, U. A. J., Pieroh, P., von der Höh, N., Völker, A., Pfeifle, C., Glasmacher, S., Heyde, C. E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9938545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36803456
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-01934-7
_version_ 1784890655317688320
author Jarvers, J.-S.
Spiegl, U. A. J.
Pieroh, P.
von der Höh, N.
Völker, A.
Pfeifle, C.
Glasmacher, S.
Heyde, C. E.
author_facet Jarvers, J.-S.
Spiegl, U. A. J.
Pieroh, P.
von der Höh, N.
Völker, A.
Pfeifle, C.
Glasmacher, S.
Heyde, C. E.
author_sort Jarvers, J.-S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the applicability and advantages of intraoperative imaging using a 3D flat panel in the treatment of C1/2 instabilities. MATERIALS: Prospective single-centered study including surgeries at the upper cervical spine between 06/2016 and 12/2018. Intraoperatively thin K-wires were placed under 2D fluoroscopic control. Then an intraoperative 3D-scan was carried out. The image quality was assessed based on a numeric analogue scale (NAS) from 0 to 10 (0 = worst quality, 10 = perfect quality) and the time for the 3D-scan was measured. Additionally, the wire positions were evaluated regarding malpositions. RESULTS: A total of 58 patients were included (33f, 25 m, average age 75.2 years, r.:18–95) with pathologies of C2: 45 type II fractures according to Anderson/D'Alonzo with or without arthrosis of C1/2, 2 Unhappy triad of C1/2 (Odontoid fracture Type II, anterior or posterior C1 arch-fracture, Arthrosis C1/2) 4 pathological fractures, 3 pseudarthroses, 3 instabilities of C1/2 because of rheumatoid arthritis, 1 C2 arch fracture). 36 patients were treated from anterior [29 AOTAF (combined anterior odontoid and transarticular C1/2 screw fixation), 6 lag screws, 1 cement augmented lag screw] and 22 patients from posterior (regarding to Goel/Harms). The median image quality was 8.2 (r.: 6–10). In 41 patients (70.7%) the image quality was 8 or higher and in none of the patients below 6. All of those 17 patients the image quality below 8 (NAS 7 = 16; 27.6%, NAS 6 = 1, 1.7%), had dental implants. A total of 148 wires were analyzed. 133 (89.9%) showed a correct positioning. In the other 15 (10.1%) cases a repositioning had to be done (n = 8; 5.4%) or it had to be drawn back (n = 7; 4.7%). A repositioning was possible in all cases. The implementation of an intraoperative 3D-Scan took an average of 267 s (r.: 232-310 s). No technical problems occurred. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative 3D imaging in the upper cervical spine is fast and easy to perform with sufficient image quality in all patients. Potential malposition of the primary screw canal can be detected by initial wire positioning before the Scan. The intraoperative correction was possible in all patients. Trial registration German Trials Register (Registered 10 August 2021, DRKS00026644—Trial registration: German Trials Register (Registered 10 August 2021, DRKS00026644—https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00026644)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9938545
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99385452023-02-19 Does the intraoperative 3D-flat panel control of the planned implant position lead to an optimization and increased in safety in the anatomically demanding region C1/2? Jarvers, J.-S. Spiegl, U. A. J. Pieroh, P. von der Höh, N. Völker, A. Pfeifle, C. Glasmacher, S. Heyde, C. E. BMC Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the applicability and advantages of intraoperative imaging using a 3D flat panel in the treatment of C1/2 instabilities. MATERIALS: Prospective single-centered study including surgeries at the upper cervical spine between 06/2016 and 12/2018. Intraoperatively thin K-wires were placed under 2D fluoroscopic control. Then an intraoperative 3D-scan was carried out. The image quality was assessed based on a numeric analogue scale (NAS) from 0 to 10 (0 = worst quality, 10 = perfect quality) and the time for the 3D-scan was measured. Additionally, the wire positions were evaluated regarding malpositions. RESULTS: A total of 58 patients were included (33f, 25 m, average age 75.2 years, r.:18–95) with pathologies of C2: 45 type II fractures according to Anderson/D'Alonzo with or without arthrosis of C1/2, 2 Unhappy triad of C1/2 (Odontoid fracture Type II, anterior or posterior C1 arch-fracture, Arthrosis C1/2) 4 pathological fractures, 3 pseudarthroses, 3 instabilities of C1/2 because of rheumatoid arthritis, 1 C2 arch fracture). 36 patients were treated from anterior [29 AOTAF (combined anterior odontoid and transarticular C1/2 screw fixation), 6 lag screws, 1 cement augmented lag screw] and 22 patients from posterior (regarding to Goel/Harms). The median image quality was 8.2 (r.: 6–10). In 41 patients (70.7%) the image quality was 8 or higher and in none of the patients below 6. All of those 17 patients the image quality below 8 (NAS 7 = 16; 27.6%, NAS 6 = 1, 1.7%), had dental implants. A total of 148 wires were analyzed. 133 (89.9%) showed a correct positioning. In the other 15 (10.1%) cases a repositioning had to be done (n = 8; 5.4%) or it had to be drawn back (n = 7; 4.7%). A repositioning was possible in all cases. The implementation of an intraoperative 3D-Scan took an average of 267 s (r.: 232-310 s). No technical problems occurred. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative 3D imaging in the upper cervical spine is fast and easy to perform with sufficient image quality in all patients. Potential malposition of the primary screw canal can be detected by initial wire positioning before the Scan. The intraoperative correction was possible in all patients. Trial registration German Trials Register (Registered 10 August 2021, DRKS00026644—Trial registration: German Trials Register (Registered 10 August 2021, DRKS00026644—https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00026644) BioMed Central 2023-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9938545/ /pubmed/36803456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-01934-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jarvers, J.-S.
Spiegl, U. A. J.
Pieroh, P.
von der Höh, N.
Völker, A.
Pfeifle, C.
Glasmacher, S.
Heyde, C. E.
Does the intraoperative 3D-flat panel control of the planned implant position lead to an optimization and increased in safety in the anatomically demanding region C1/2?
title Does the intraoperative 3D-flat panel control of the planned implant position lead to an optimization and increased in safety in the anatomically demanding region C1/2?
title_full Does the intraoperative 3D-flat panel control of the planned implant position lead to an optimization and increased in safety in the anatomically demanding region C1/2?
title_fullStr Does the intraoperative 3D-flat panel control of the planned implant position lead to an optimization and increased in safety in the anatomically demanding region C1/2?
title_full_unstemmed Does the intraoperative 3D-flat panel control of the planned implant position lead to an optimization and increased in safety in the anatomically demanding region C1/2?
title_short Does the intraoperative 3D-flat panel control of the planned implant position lead to an optimization and increased in safety in the anatomically demanding region C1/2?
title_sort does the intraoperative 3d-flat panel control of the planned implant position lead to an optimization and increased in safety in the anatomically demanding region c1/2?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9938545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36803456
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-01934-7
work_keys_str_mv AT jarversjs doestheintraoperative3dflatpanelcontroloftheplannedimplantpositionleadtoanoptimizationandincreasedinsafetyintheanatomicallydemandingregionc12
AT spiegluaj doestheintraoperative3dflatpanelcontroloftheplannedimplantpositionleadtoanoptimizationandincreasedinsafetyintheanatomicallydemandingregionc12
AT pierohp doestheintraoperative3dflatpanelcontroloftheplannedimplantpositionleadtoanoptimizationandincreasedinsafetyintheanatomicallydemandingregionc12
AT vonderhohn doestheintraoperative3dflatpanelcontroloftheplannedimplantpositionleadtoanoptimizationandincreasedinsafetyintheanatomicallydemandingregionc12
AT volkera doestheintraoperative3dflatpanelcontroloftheplannedimplantpositionleadtoanoptimizationandincreasedinsafetyintheanatomicallydemandingregionc12
AT pfeiflec doestheintraoperative3dflatpanelcontroloftheplannedimplantpositionleadtoanoptimizationandincreasedinsafetyintheanatomicallydemandingregionc12
AT glasmachers doestheintraoperative3dflatpanelcontroloftheplannedimplantpositionleadtoanoptimizationandincreasedinsafetyintheanatomicallydemandingregionc12
AT heydece doestheintraoperative3dflatpanelcontroloftheplannedimplantpositionleadtoanoptimizationandincreasedinsafetyintheanatomicallydemandingregionc12