Cargando…
Does the intraoperative 3D-flat panel control of the planned implant position lead to an optimization and increased in safety in the anatomically demanding region C1/2?
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the applicability and advantages of intraoperative imaging using a 3D flat panel in the treatment of C1/2 instabilities. MATERIALS: Prospective single-centered study including surgeries at the upper cervical spine between 06/2016 and 12/2018. Intraop...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9938545/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36803456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-01934-7 |
_version_ | 1784890655317688320 |
---|---|
author | Jarvers, J.-S. Spiegl, U. A. J. Pieroh, P. von der Höh, N. Völker, A. Pfeifle, C. Glasmacher, S. Heyde, C. E. |
author_facet | Jarvers, J.-S. Spiegl, U. A. J. Pieroh, P. von der Höh, N. Völker, A. Pfeifle, C. Glasmacher, S. Heyde, C. E. |
author_sort | Jarvers, J.-S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the applicability and advantages of intraoperative imaging using a 3D flat panel in the treatment of C1/2 instabilities. MATERIALS: Prospective single-centered study including surgeries at the upper cervical spine between 06/2016 and 12/2018. Intraoperatively thin K-wires were placed under 2D fluoroscopic control. Then an intraoperative 3D-scan was carried out. The image quality was assessed based on a numeric analogue scale (NAS) from 0 to 10 (0 = worst quality, 10 = perfect quality) and the time for the 3D-scan was measured. Additionally, the wire positions were evaluated regarding malpositions. RESULTS: A total of 58 patients were included (33f, 25 m, average age 75.2 years, r.:18–95) with pathologies of C2: 45 type II fractures according to Anderson/D'Alonzo with or without arthrosis of C1/2, 2 Unhappy triad of C1/2 (Odontoid fracture Type II, anterior or posterior C1 arch-fracture, Arthrosis C1/2) 4 pathological fractures, 3 pseudarthroses, 3 instabilities of C1/2 because of rheumatoid arthritis, 1 C2 arch fracture). 36 patients were treated from anterior [29 AOTAF (combined anterior odontoid and transarticular C1/2 screw fixation), 6 lag screws, 1 cement augmented lag screw] and 22 patients from posterior (regarding to Goel/Harms). The median image quality was 8.2 (r.: 6–10). In 41 patients (70.7%) the image quality was 8 or higher and in none of the patients below 6. All of those 17 patients the image quality below 8 (NAS 7 = 16; 27.6%, NAS 6 = 1, 1.7%), had dental implants. A total of 148 wires were analyzed. 133 (89.9%) showed a correct positioning. In the other 15 (10.1%) cases a repositioning had to be done (n = 8; 5.4%) or it had to be drawn back (n = 7; 4.7%). A repositioning was possible in all cases. The implementation of an intraoperative 3D-Scan took an average of 267 s (r.: 232-310 s). No technical problems occurred. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative 3D imaging in the upper cervical spine is fast and easy to perform with sufficient image quality in all patients. Potential malposition of the primary screw canal can be detected by initial wire positioning before the Scan. The intraoperative correction was possible in all patients. Trial registration German Trials Register (Registered 10 August 2021, DRKS00026644—Trial registration: German Trials Register (Registered 10 August 2021, DRKS00026644—https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00026644) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9938545 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99385452023-02-19 Does the intraoperative 3D-flat panel control of the planned implant position lead to an optimization and increased in safety in the anatomically demanding region C1/2? Jarvers, J.-S. Spiegl, U. A. J. Pieroh, P. von der Höh, N. Völker, A. Pfeifle, C. Glasmacher, S. Heyde, C. E. BMC Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the applicability and advantages of intraoperative imaging using a 3D flat panel in the treatment of C1/2 instabilities. MATERIALS: Prospective single-centered study including surgeries at the upper cervical spine between 06/2016 and 12/2018. Intraoperatively thin K-wires were placed under 2D fluoroscopic control. Then an intraoperative 3D-scan was carried out. The image quality was assessed based on a numeric analogue scale (NAS) from 0 to 10 (0 = worst quality, 10 = perfect quality) and the time for the 3D-scan was measured. Additionally, the wire positions were evaluated regarding malpositions. RESULTS: A total of 58 patients were included (33f, 25 m, average age 75.2 years, r.:18–95) with pathologies of C2: 45 type II fractures according to Anderson/D'Alonzo with or without arthrosis of C1/2, 2 Unhappy triad of C1/2 (Odontoid fracture Type II, anterior or posterior C1 arch-fracture, Arthrosis C1/2) 4 pathological fractures, 3 pseudarthroses, 3 instabilities of C1/2 because of rheumatoid arthritis, 1 C2 arch fracture). 36 patients were treated from anterior [29 AOTAF (combined anterior odontoid and transarticular C1/2 screw fixation), 6 lag screws, 1 cement augmented lag screw] and 22 patients from posterior (regarding to Goel/Harms). The median image quality was 8.2 (r.: 6–10). In 41 patients (70.7%) the image quality was 8 or higher and in none of the patients below 6. All of those 17 patients the image quality below 8 (NAS 7 = 16; 27.6%, NAS 6 = 1, 1.7%), had dental implants. A total of 148 wires were analyzed. 133 (89.9%) showed a correct positioning. In the other 15 (10.1%) cases a repositioning had to be done (n = 8; 5.4%) or it had to be drawn back (n = 7; 4.7%). A repositioning was possible in all cases. The implementation of an intraoperative 3D-Scan took an average of 267 s (r.: 232-310 s). No technical problems occurred. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative 3D imaging in the upper cervical spine is fast and easy to perform with sufficient image quality in all patients. Potential malposition of the primary screw canal can be detected by initial wire positioning before the Scan. The intraoperative correction was possible in all patients. Trial registration German Trials Register (Registered 10 August 2021, DRKS00026644—Trial registration: German Trials Register (Registered 10 August 2021, DRKS00026644—https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00026644) BioMed Central 2023-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9938545/ /pubmed/36803456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-01934-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Jarvers, J.-S. Spiegl, U. A. J. Pieroh, P. von der Höh, N. Völker, A. Pfeifle, C. Glasmacher, S. Heyde, C. E. Does the intraoperative 3D-flat panel control of the planned implant position lead to an optimization and increased in safety in the anatomically demanding region C1/2? |
title | Does the intraoperative 3D-flat panel control of the planned implant position lead to an optimization and increased in safety in the anatomically demanding region C1/2? |
title_full | Does the intraoperative 3D-flat panel control of the planned implant position lead to an optimization and increased in safety in the anatomically demanding region C1/2? |
title_fullStr | Does the intraoperative 3D-flat panel control of the planned implant position lead to an optimization and increased in safety in the anatomically demanding region C1/2? |
title_full_unstemmed | Does the intraoperative 3D-flat panel control of the planned implant position lead to an optimization and increased in safety in the anatomically demanding region C1/2? |
title_short | Does the intraoperative 3D-flat panel control of the planned implant position lead to an optimization and increased in safety in the anatomically demanding region C1/2? |
title_sort | does the intraoperative 3d-flat panel control of the planned implant position lead to an optimization and increased in safety in the anatomically demanding region c1/2? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9938545/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36803456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-01934-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jarversjs doestheintraoperative3dflatpanelcontroloftheplannedimplantpositionleadtoanoptimizationandincreasedinsafetyintheanatomicallydemandingregionc12 AT spiegluaj doestheintraoperative3dflatpanelcontroloftheplannedimplantpositionleadtoanoptimizationandincreasedinsafetyintheanatomicallydemandingregionc12 AT pierohp doestheintraoperative3dflatpanelcontroloftheplannedimplantpositionleadtoanoptimizationandincreasedinsafetyintheanatomicallydemandingregionc12 AT vonderhohn doestheintraoperative3dflatpanelcontroloftheplannedimplantpositionleadtoanoptimizationandincreasedinsafetyintheanatomicallydemandingregionc12 AT volkera doestheintraoperative3dflatpanelcontroloftheplannedimplantpositionleadtoanoptimizationandincreasedinsafetyintheanatomicallydemandingregionc12 AT pfeiflec doestheintraoperative3dflatpanelcontroloftheplannedimplantpositionleadtoanoptimizationandincreasedinsafetyintheanatomicallydemandingregionc12 AT glasmachers doestheintraoperative3dflatpanelcontroloftheplannedimplantpositionleadtoanoptimizationandincreasedinsafetyintheanatomicallydemandingregionc12 AT heydece doestheintraoperative3dflatpanelcontroloftheplannedimplantpositionleadtoanoptimizationandincreasedinsafetyintheanatomicallydemandingregionc12 |