Cargando…
Pain inhibition—the unintended benefit of electrically elicited muscle strengthening contractions
BACKGROUND: Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is effective in muscle strengthening after orthopedic injury particularly when muscle activation failure is present, but the associated pain can be a barrier. Pain itself can produce a pain inhibitory response called Conditioned Pain Modulation...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9938574/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36803339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06243-x |
_version_ | 1784890660990484480 |
---|---|
author | Rudolph, Katherine S. Cloutier, Matthew Stackhouse, Scott |
author_facet | Rudolph, Katherine S. Cloutier, Matthew Stackhouse, Scott |
author_sort | Rudolph, Katherine S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is effective in muscle strengthening after orthopedic injury particularly when muscle activation failure is present, but the associated pain can be a barrier. Pain itself can produce a pain inhibitory response called Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM). CPM is often used in research studies to assess the state of the pain processing system. However, the inhibitory response of CPM could make NMES more tolerable to patients and could improve functional outcomes in people with pain. This study compares the pain-inhibitory effect of NMES compared to volitional contractions and noxious electrical stimulation (NxES). METHODS: Healthy participants, 18–30 years of age experienced 3 conditions: 10 NMES contractions, 10 bursts of NxES on the patella, and 10 volitional contractions on the right knee. Pressure pain thresholds (PPT) were measured before and after each condition in both knees and the middle finger. Pain was reported on an 11-point VAS. Repeated measures ANOVAs with 2 factors: site and time were performed for each condition followed by post-hoc paired t-tests, with Bonferroni correction. RESULTS: Pain ratings were higher in the NxES condition compared to NMES (p = .000). No differences in PPTs prior to each condition were observed but PPTs were significantly higher in the right and left knees after the NMES contractions (p = .000, p = .013, respectively) and after the NxES (p = .006, P-.006, respectively). Pain during NMES and NxES did not correlate with pain inhibition (p > .05). Self-reported pain sensitivity correlated with pain during NxES. CONCLUSION: NxES and NMES produced higher PPTs in both knees but not in the finger, suggesting that the mechanisms responsible for the reduction in pain are located in the spinal cord and local tissues. Pain reduction was elicited during the NxES and NMES conditions regardless of the self-reported pain ratings. When NMES is used for muscle strengthening significant pain reduction can also occur, which is an unintended benefit of the intervention that could improve functional outcomes in patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9938574 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99385742023-02-19 Pain inhibition—the unintended benefit of electrically elicited muscle strengthening contractions Rudolph, Katherine S. Cloutier, Matthew Stackhouse, Scott BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is effective in muscle strengthening after orthopedic injury particularly when muscle activation failure is present, but the associated pain can be a barrier. Pain itself can produce a pain inhibitory response called Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM). CPM is often used in research studies to assess the state of the pain processing system. However, the inhibitory response of CPM could make NMES more tolerable to patients and could improve functional outcomes in people with pain. This study compares the pain-inhibitory effect of NMES compared to volitional contractions and noxious electrical stimulation (NxES). METHODS: Healthy participants, 18–30 years of age experienced 3 conditions: 10 NMES contractions, 10 bursts of NxES on the patella, and 10 volitional contractions on the right knee. Pressure pain thresholds (PPT) were measured before and after each condition in both knees and the middle finger. Pain was reported on an 11-point VAS. Repeated measures ANOVAs with 2 factors: site and time were performed for each condition followed by post-hoc paired t-tests, with Bonferroni correction. RESULTS: Pain ratings were higher in the NxES condition compared to NMES (p = .000). No differences in PPTs prior to each condition were observed but PPTs were significantly higher in the right and left knees after the NMES contractions (p = .000, p = .013, respectively) and after the NxES (p = .006, P-.006, respectively). Pain during NMES and NxES did not correlate with pain inhibition (p > .05). Self-reported pain sensitivity correlated with pain during NxES. CONCLUSION: NxES and NMES produced higher PPTs in both knees but not in the finger, suggesting that the mechanisms responsible for the reduction in pain are located in the spinal cord and local tissues. Pain reduction was elicited during the NxES and NMES conditions regardless of the self-reported pain ratings. When NMES is used for muscle strengthening significant pain reduction can also occur, which is an unintended benefit of the intervention that could improve functional outcomes in patients. BioMed Central 2023-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9938574/ /pubmed/36803339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06243-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Rudolph, Katherine S. Cloutier, Matthew Stackhouse, Scott Pain inhibition—the unintended benefit of electrically elicited muscle strengthening contractions |
title | Pain inhibition—the unintended benefit of electrically elicited muscle strengthening contractions |
title_full | Pain inhibition—the unintended benefit of electrically elicited muscle strengthening contractions |
title_fullStr | Pain inhibition—the unintended benefit of electrically elicited muscle strengthening contractions |
title_full_unstemmed | Pain inhibition—the unintended benefit of electrically elicited muscle strengthening contractions |
title_short | Pain inhibition—the unintended benefit of electrically elicited muscle strengthening contractions |
title_sort | pain inhibition—the unintended benefit of electrically elicited muscle strengthening contractions |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9938574/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36803339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06243-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rudolphkatherines paininhibitiontheunintendedbenefitofelectricallyelicitedmusclestrengtheningcontractions AT cloutiermatthew paininhibitiontheunintendedbenefitofelectricallyelicitedmusclestrengtheningcontractions AT stackhousescott paininhibitiontheunintendedbenefitofelectricallyelicitedmusclestrengtheningcontractions |