Cargando…

Is the EU shirking responsibility for its deforestation footprint in tropical countries? Power, material, and epistemic inequalities in the EU’s global environmental governance

This paper critically examines the European Union’s (EU) role in tropical deforestation and the bloc’s actions to mitigate it. We focus on two EU policy communications aimed at the challenge: stepping up EU action to protect and restore the world's forests and the EU updated bioeconomy strategy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumeh, Eric Mensah, Ramcilovic-Suominen, Sabaheta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Japan 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9938692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36845358
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11625-023-01302-7
_version_ 1784890687278284800
author Kumeh, Eric Mensah
Ramcilovic-Suominen, Sabaheta
author_facet Kumeh, Eric Mensah
Ramcilovic-Suominen, Sabaheta
author_sort Kumeh, Eric Mensah
collection PubMed
description This paper critically examines the European Union’s (EU) role in tropical deforestation and the bloc’s actions to mitigate it. We focus on two EU policy communications aimed at the challenge: stepping up EU action to protect and restore the world's forests and the EU updated bioeconomy strategy. In addition, we refer to the European Green Deal, which articulates the bloc’s overarching vision for sustainability and transformations. We find that by casting deforestation as a production problem and a governance challenge on the supply side, these policies deflect attention from some of the key drivers of tropical deforestation—the EU’s overconsumption of deforestation-related commodities and asymmetric market and trade power relations. The diversion allows the EU unfettered access to agro-commodities and biofuels, which are important inputs to the EU’s green transition and bio-based economy. Upholding a ‘sustainability image’ within the EU, an overly business-as-usual approach has taken precedence over transformative policies, enabling multinational corporations to run an ecocide treadmill, rapidly obliterating tropical forests. Whereas the EU's plan to nurture a bioeconomy and promote responsible agro-commodities production in the global South are relevant, the bloc is evasive in setting firm targets and policy measures to overcome the inequalities that spring from and enable its overconsumption of deforestation-related commodities. Drawing on degrowth and decolonial theories, we problematise the EU’s anti-deforestation policies and highlight alternative ideas that could lead to more just, equitable and effective measures for confronting the tropical deforestation conundrum.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9938692
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Japan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99386922023-02-21 Is the EU shirking responsibility for its deforestation footprint in tropical countries? Power, material, and epistemic inequalities in the EU’s global environmental governance Kumeh, Eric Mensah Ramcilovic-Suominen, Sabaheta Sustain Sci Special Feature: Original Article This paper critically examines the European Union’s (EU) role in tropical deforestation and the bloc’s actions to mitigate it. We focus on two EU policy communications aimed at the challenge: stepping up EU action to protect and restore the world's forests and the EU updated bioeconomy strategy. In addition, we refer to the European Green Deal, which articulates the bloc’s overarching vision for sustainability and transformations. We find that by casting deforestation as a production problem and a governance challenge on the supply side, these policies deflect attention from some of the key drivers of tropical deforestation—the EU’s overconsumption of deforestation-related commodities and asymmetric market and trade power relations. The diversion allows the EU unfettered access to agro-commodities and biofuels, which are important inputs to the EU’s green transition and bio-based economy. Upholding a ‘sustainability image’ within the EU, an overly business-as-usual approach has taken precedence over transformative policies, enabling multinational corporations to run an ecocide treadmill, rapidly obliterating tropical forests. Whereas the EU's plan to nurture a bioeconomy and promote responsible agro-commodities production in the global South are relevant, the bloc is evasive in setting firm targets and policy measures to overcome the inequalities that spring from and enable its overconsumption of deforestation-related commodities. Drawing on degrowth and decolonial theories, we problematise the EU’s anti-deforestation policies and highlight alternative ideas that could lead to more just, equitable and effective measures for confronting the tropical deforestation conundrum. Springer Japan 2023-02-18 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9938692/ /pubmed/36845358 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11625-023-01302-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Special Feature: Original Article
Kumeh, Eric Mensah
Ramcilovic-Suominen, Sabaheta
Is the EU shirking responsibility for its deforestation footprint in tropical countries? Power, material, and epistemic inequalities in the EU’s global environmental governance
title Is the EU shirking responsibility for its deforestation footprint in tropical countries? Power, material, and epistemic inequalities in the EU’s global environmental governance
title_full Is the EU shirking responsibility for its deforestation footprint in tropical countries? Power, material, and epistemic inequalities in the EU’s global environmental governance
title_fullStr Is the EU shirking responsibility for its deforestation footprint in tropical countries? Power, material, and epistemic inequalities in the EU’s global environmental governance
title_full_unstemmed Is the EU shirking responsibility for its deforestation footprint in tropical countries? Power, material, and epistemic inequalities in the EU’s global environmental governance
title_short Is the EU shirking responsibility for its deforestation footprint in tropical countries? Power, material, and epistemic inequalities in the EU’s global environmental governance
title_sort is the eu shirking responsibility for its deforestation footprint in tropical countries? power, material, and epistemic inequalities in the eu’s global environmental governance
topic Special Feature: Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9938692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36845358
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11625-023-01302-7
work_keys_str_mv AT kumehericmensah istheeushirkingresponsibilityforitsdeforestationfootprintintropicalcountriespowermaterialandepistemicinequalitiesintheeusglobalenvironmentalgovernance
AT ramcilovicsuominensabaheta istheeushirkingresponsibilityforitsdeforestationfootprintintropicalcountriespowermaterialandepistemicinequalitiesintheeusglobalenvironmentalgovernance