Cargando…

The use of segregation analysis in interpretation of sequence variants in SMAD3: A case report

BACKGROUND: While representing a significant improvement, the introduction of next‐generation sequencing in genetic diagnosis also prompted new challenges. Despite widely recognized consensus guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants, many variants remain unclassified or are discordantl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ratajska, Aleksandra, Vigeland, Magnus D., Wirgenes, Katrine Verena, Krohg‐Sørensen, Kirsten, Paus, Benedicte
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9938750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36495030
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.2107
_version_ 1784890699583324160
author Ratajska, Aleksandra
Vigeland, Magnus D.
Wirgenes, Katrine Verena
Krohg‐Sørensen, Kirsten
Paus, Benedicte
author_facet Ratajska, Aleksandra
Vigeland, Magnus D.
Wirgenes, Katrine Verena
Krohg‐Sørensen, Kirsten
Paus, Benedicte
author_sort Ratajska, Aleksandra
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: While representing a significant improvement, the introduction of next‐generation sequencing in genetic diagnosis also prompted new challenges. Despite widely recognized consensus guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants, many variants remain unclassified or are discordantly interpreted. In heritable thoracic aortic aneurysms with dissection (HTAAD), most cases are caused by a heterozygous, private missense mutation, possibly contributing to the relatively common reports of variants with uncertain significance in this group. Segregation analysis necessitates advanced likelihood‐based methods typically inaccessible to non‐experts and is hampered by reduced penetrance, possible phenocopies, and non‐availability of DNA from deceased relatives. METHODS: In this report, challenges in variant interpretation and the use of segregation analyses were illustrated in two families with a suspected HTAAD disorder. The R package segregatr, a novel implementation of full‐likelihood Bayes factor (FLB), was performed to explore the cosegregation of the variants in these families. CONCLUSION: Using the R package segregatr, cosegregation in the reported families concluded with strong and supporting evidence for pathogenicity. Surveillance of families in a multidisciplinary team enabling systematic phenotype description for standardized segregation analysis with a robust calculation method may be imperative for reliable variant interpretation in HTAAD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9938750
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99387502023-02-19 The use of segregation analysis in interpretation of sequence variants in SMAD3: A case report Ratajska, Aleksandra Vigeland, Magnus D. Wirgenes, Katrine Verena Krohg‐Sørensen, Kirsten Paus, Benedicte Mol Genet Genomic Med Clinical Reports BACKGROUND: While representing a significant improvement, the introduction of next‐generation sequencing in genetic diagnosis also prompted new challenges. Despite widely recognized consensus guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants, many variants remain unclassified or are discordantly interpreted. In heritable thoracic aortic aneurysms with dissection (HTAAD), most cases are caused by a heterozygous, private missense mutation, possibly contributing to the relatively common reports of variants with uncertain significance in this group. Segregation analysis necessitates advanced likelihood‐based methods typically inaccessible to non‐experts and is hampered by reduced penetrance, possible phenocopies, and non‐availability of DNA from deceased relatives. METHODS: In this report, challenges in variant interpretation and the use of segregation analyses were illustrated in two families with a suspected HTAAD disorder. The R package segregatr, a novel implementation of full‐likelihood Bayes factor (FLB), was performed to explore the cosegregation of the variants in these families. CONCLUSION: Using the R package segregatr, cosegregation in the reported families concluded with strong and supporting evidence for pathogenicity. Surveillance of families in a multidisciplinary team enabling systematic phenotype description for standardized segregation analysis with a robust calculation method may be imperative for reliable variant interpretation in HTAAD. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9938750/ /pubmed/36495030 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.2107 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Clinical Reports
Ratajska, Aleksandra
Vigeland, Magnus D.
Wirgenes, Katrine Verena
Krohg‐Sørensen, Kirsten
Paus, Benedicte
The use of segregation analysis in interpretation of sequence variants in SMAD3: A case report
title The use of segregation analysis in interpretation of sequence variants in SMAD3: A case report
title_full The use of segregation analysis in interpretation of sequence variants in SMAD3: A case report
title_fullStr The use of segregation analysis in interpretation of sequence variants in SMAD3: A case report
title_full_unstemmed The use of segregation analysis in interpretation of sequence variants in SMAD3: A case report
title_short The use of segregation analysis in interpretation of sequence variants in SMAD3: A case report
title_sort use of segregation analysis in interpretation of sequence variants in smad3: a case report
topic Clinical Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9938750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36495030
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.2107
work_keys_str_mv AT ratajskaaleksandra theuseofsegregationanalysisininterpretationofsequencevariantsinsmad3acasereport
AT vigelandmagnusd theuseofsegregationanalysisininterpretationofsequencevariantsinsmad3acasereport
AT wirgeneskatrineverena theuseofsegregationanalysisininterpretationofsequencevariantsinsmad3acasereport
AT krohgsørensenkirsten theuseofsegregationanalysisininterpretationofsequencevariantsinsmad3acasereport
AT pausbenedicte theuseofsegregationanalysisininterpretationofsequencevariantsinsmad3acasereport
AT ratajskaaleksandra useofsegregationanalysisininterpretationofsequencevariantsinsmad3acasereport
AT vigelandmagnusd useofsegregationanalysisininterpretationofsequencevariantsinsmad3acasereport
AT wirgeneskatrineverena useofsegregationanalysisininterpretationofsequencevariantsinsmad3acasereport
AT krohgsørensenkirsten useofsegregationanalysisininterpretationofsequencevariantsinsmad3acasereport
AT pausbenedicte useofsegregationanalysisininterpretationofsequencevariantsinsmad3acasereport