Cargando…

Assessing Epstein–Barr virus in gastric cancer: clinicopathological features and prognostic implications

BACKGROUND: Epstein–Barr virus (EBV)-associated gastric cancer (EBVaGC) was a unique molecular subtype of gastric cancer (GC). However, the clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic role of EBV infection remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the clinicopathological features of EBVaGC and it...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Guanghua, Zhou, Zhihao, Wang, Zhixiong, Wang, Zhao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9938970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36803802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13027-023-00489-9
_version_ 1784890744870273024
author Li, Guanghua
Zhou, Zhihao
Wang, Zhixiong
Wang, Zhao
author_facet Li, Guanghua
Zhou, Zhihao
Wang, Zhixiong
Wang, Zhao
author_sort Li, Guanghua
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Epstein–Barr virus (EBV)-associated gastric cancer (EBVaGC) was a unique molecular subtype of gastric cancer (GC). However, the clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic role of EBV infection remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the clinicopathological features of EBVaGC and its role on prognosis. METHODS: EBV-encoded RNA (EBER) in situ hybridization method was used to evaluate the EBV status in GC. The serum tumor markers AFP, CEA, CA19-9 and CA125 of patients were detected before treatment. HER2 expression and microsatellite instability (MSI) status was evaluated according to established criteria. The relationship between EBV infection and clinicopathological factors as well as its role on prognosis were investigated. RESULTS: 420 patients were enrolled in the study and of 53 patients (12.62%) were identified as EBVaGC. EBVaGC was more common in males (p = 0.001) and related to early T stage (p = 0.045), early TNM stage (p = 0.001) and lower level of serum CEA (p = 0.039). No association could be found between EBV infection and HER2 expression, MSI status and other factors (p all > 0.05). Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed that both the overall survival and disease-free survival of EBVaGC patients were similar to that of EBV-negative GC (EBVnGC) patients (p = 0.309 and p = 0.264, respectively). CONCLUSION: EBVaGC was more common in males and in patients with the early T stage and TNM stage as well as patients with lower serum CEA level. Difference in overall survival and disease-free survival between EBVaGC and EBVnGC patients cannot be detected. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13027-023-00489-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9938970
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99389702023-02-20 Assessing Epstein–Barr virus in gastric cancer: clinicopathological features and prognostic implications Li, Guanghua Zhou, Zhihao Wang, Zhixiong Wang, Zhao Infect Agent Cancer Research BACKGROUND: Epstein–Barr virus (EBV)-associated gastric cancer (EBVaGC) was a unique molecular subtype of gastric cancer (GC). However, the clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic role of EBV infection remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the clinicopathological features of EBVaGC and its role on prognosis. METHODS: EBV-encoded RNA (EBER) in situ hybridization method was used to evaluate the EBV status in GC. The serum tumor markers AFP, CEA, CA19-9 and CA125 of patients were detected before treatment. HER2 expression and microsatellite instability (MSI) status was evaluated according to established criteria. The relationship between EBV infection and clinicopathological factors as well as its role on prognosis were investigated. RESULTS: 420 patients were enrolled in the study and of 53 patients (12.62%) were identified as EBVaGC. EBVaGC was more common in males (p = 0.001) and related to early T stage (p = 0.045), early TNM stage (p = 0.001) and lower level of serum CEA (p = 0.039). No association could be found between EBV infection and HER2 expression, MSI status and other factors (p all > 0.05). Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed that both the overall survival and disease-free survival of EBVaGC patients were similar to that of EBV-negative GC (EBVnGC) patients (p = 0.309 and p = 0.264, respectively). CONCLUSION: EBVaGC was more common in males and in patients with the early T stage and TNM stage as well as patients with lower serum CEA level. Difference in overall survival and disease-free survival between EBVaGC and EBVnGC patients cannot be detected. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13027-023-00489-9. BioMed Central 2023-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9938970/ /pubmed/36803802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13027-023-00489-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Li, Guanghua
Zhou, Zhihao
Wang, Zhixiong
Wang, Zhao
Assessing Epstein–Barr virus in gastric cancer: clinicopathological features and prognostic implications
title Assessing Epstein–Barr virus in gastric cancer: clinicopathological features and prognostic implications
title_full Assessing Epstein–Barr virus in gastric cancer: clinicopathological features and prognostic implications
title_fullStr Assessing Epstein–Barr virus in gastric cancer: clinicopathological features and prognostic implications
title_full_unstemmed Assessing Epstein–Barr virus in gastric cancer: clinicopathological features and prognostic implications
title_short Assessing Epstein–Barr virus in gastric cancer: clinicopathological features and prognostic implications
title_sort assessing epstein–barr virus in gastric cancer: clinicopathological features and prognostic implications
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9938970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36803802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13027-023-00489-9
work_keys_str_mv AT liguanghua assessingepsteinbarrvirusingastriccancerclinicopathologicalfeaturesandprognosticimplications
AT zhouzhihao assessingepsteinbarrvirusingastriccancerclinicopathologicalfeaturesandprognosticimplications
AT wangzhixiong assessingepsteinbarrvirusingastriccancerclinicopathologicalfeaturesandprognosticimplications
AT wangzhao assessingepsteinbarrvirusingastriccancerclinicopathologicalfeaturesandprognosticimplications