Cargando…

Gaps in the screening process for women diagnosed with cervical cancer in four diverse US health care settings

BACKGROUND: Potential care gaps in the cervical cancer screening process among women diagnosed with cervical cancer in an era with increased human papillomavirus (HPV) testing have not been extensively evaluated. METHODS: Women diagnosed with cervical cancer between ages 21 and 65 at four study site...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chao, Chun R., Chubak, Jessica, Beaber, Elisabeth F., Kamineni, Aruna, Mao, Connie, Silverberg, Michael J., Tiro, Jasmin A., Skinner, Celette, Garcia, Michael, Corley, Douglas A., Winer, Rachel L., Raine‐Bennett, Tina, Feldman, Sarah, Wheeler, Cosette M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9939213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36106421
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5226
_version_ 1784890798758690816
author Chao, Chun R.
Chubak, Jessica
Beaber, Elisabeth F.
Kamineni, Aruna
Mao, Connie
Silverberg, Michael J.
Tiro, Jasmin A.
Skinner, Celette
Garcia, Michael
Corley, Douglas A.
Winer, Rachel L.
Raine‐Bennett, Tina
Feldman, Sarah
Wheeler, Cosette M.
author_facet Chao, Chun R.
Chubak, Jessica
Beaber, Elisabeth F.
Kamineni, Aruna
Mao, Connie
Silverberg, Michael J.
Tiro, Jasmin A.
Skinner, Celette
Garcia, Michael
Corley, Douglas A.
Winer, Rachel L.
Raine‐Bennett, Tina
Feldman, Sarah
Wheeler, Cosette M.
author_sort Chao, Chun R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Potential care gaps in the cervical cancer screening process among women diagnosed with cervical cancer in an era with increased human papillomavirus (HPV) testing have not been extensively evaluated. METHODS: Women diagnosed with cervical cancer between ages 21 and 65 at four study sites between 2010 and 2014 were included. Screening histories were ascertained from 0.5 to 4 years prior to cervical cancer diagnosis. We identified potential care gaps in the screening history for each woman and classified them into one of three mutually exclusive types: lack of a screening test, screening test failure, and diagnostic/treatment care gap. Distributions of care gaps were tabulated by stage, histology, and study site. Multivariable nominal logistic regression was used to examine the associations between demographic and cancer characteristics and type of care gap. RESULTS: Of 499 women evaluated, 46% lacked a screening test in the time window examined, 31% experienced a screening test failure, and 22% experienced a diagnostic/treatment care gap. More than half of the women with advanced cancer and squamous cell carcinoma lacked a screening test compared to 31% and 24% of women with localized cancer and adenocarcinoma, respectively. Women aged 21–29 at diagnosis were more likely to experience screening test failure and diagnostic/treatment care gap, while those aged 50–65 were more likely to lack a screening test, compared to women aged 30–39. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate a continuing need to develop interventions targeting unscreened and under‐screened women and improve detection and diagnosis of adenocarcinoma in women undergoing cervical cancer screening and diagnostic follow‐up.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9939213
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99392132023-02-20 Gaps in the screening process for women diagnosed with cervical cancer in four diverse US health care settings Chao, Chun R. Chubak, Jessica Beaber, Elisabeth F. Kamineni, Aruna Mao, Connie Silverberg, Michael J. Tiro, Jasmin A. Skinner, Celette Garcia, Michael Corley, Douglas A. Winer, Rachel L. Raine‐Bennett, Tina Feldman, Sarah Wheeler, Cosette M. Cancer Med RESEARCH ARTICLES BACKGROUND: Potential care gaps in the cervical cancer screening process among women diagnosed with cervical cancer in an era with increased human papillomavirus (HPV) testing have not been extensively evaluated. METHODS: Women diagnosed with cervical cancer between ages 21 and 65 at four study sites between 2010 and 2014 were included. Screening histories were ascertained from 0.5 to 4 years prior to cervical cancer diagnosis. We identified potential care gaps in the screening history for each woman and classified them into one of three mutually exclusive types: lack of a screening test, screening test failure, and diagnostic/treatment care gap. Distributions of care gaps were tabulated by stage, histology, and study site. Multivariable nominal logistic regression was used to examine the associations between demographic and cancer characteristics and type of care gap. RESULTS: Of 499 women evaluated, 46% lacked a screening test in the time window examined, 31% experienced a screening test failure, and 22% experienced a diagnostic/treatment care gap. More than half of the women with advanced cancer and squamous cell carcinoma lacked a screening test compared to 31% and 24% of women with localized cancer and adenocarcinoma, respectively. Women aged 21–29 at diagnosis were more likely to experience screening test failure and diagnostic/treatment care gap, while those aged 50–65 were more likely to lack a screening test, compared to women aged 30–39. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate a continuing need to develop interventions targeting unscreened and under‐screened women and improve detection and diagnosis of adenocarcinoma in women undergoing cervical cancer screening and diagnostic follow‐up. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9939213/ /pubmed/36106421 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5226 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle RESEARCH ARTICLES
Chao, Chun R.
Chubak, Jessica
Beaber, Elisabeth F.
Kamineni, Aruna
Mao, Connie
Silverberg, Michael J.
Tiro, Jasmin A.
Skinner, Celette
Garcia, Michael
Corley, Douglas A.
Winer, Rachel L.
Raine‐Bennett, Tina
Feldman, Sarah
Wheeler, Cosette M.
Gaps in the screening process for women diagnosed with cervical cancer in four diverse US health care settings
title Gaps in the screening process for women diagnosed with cervical cancer in four diverse US health care settings
title_full Gaps in the screening process for women diagnosed with cervical cancer in four diverse US health care settings
title_fullStr Gaps in the screening process for women diagnosed with cervical cancer in four diverse US health care settings
title_full_unstemmed Gaps in the screening process for women diagnosed with cervical cancer in four diverse US health care settings
title_short Gaps in the screening process for women diagnosed with cervical cancer in four diverse US health care settings
title_sort gaps in the screening process for women diagnosed with cervical cancer in four diverse us health care settings
topic RESEARCH ARTICLES
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9939213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36106421
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5226
work_keys_str_mv AT chaochunr gapsinthescreeningprocessforwomendiagnosedwithcervicalcancerinfourdiverseushealthcaresettings
AT chubakjessica gapsinthescreeningprocessforwomendiagnosedwithcervicalcancerinfourdiverseushealthcaresettings
AT beaberelisabethf gapsinthescreeningprocessforwomendiagnosedwithcervicalcancerinfourdiverseushealthcaresettings
AT kamineniaruna gapsinthescreeningprocessforwomendiagnosedwithcervicalcancerinfourdiverseushealthcaresettings
AT maoconnie gapsinthescreeningprocessforwomendiagnosedwithcervicalcancerinfourdiverseushealthcaresettings
AT silverbergmichaelj gapsinthescreeningprocessforwomendiagnosedwithcervicalcancerinfourdiverseushealthcaresettings
AT tirojasmina gapsinthescreeningprocessforwomendiagnosedwithcervicalcancerinfourdiverseushealthcaresettings
AT skinnercelette gapsinthescreeningprocessforwomendiagnosedwithcervicalcancerinfourdiverseushealthcaresettings
AT garciamichael gapsinthescreeningprocessforwomendiagnosedwithcervicalcancerinfourdiverseushealthcaresettings
AT corleydouglasa gapsinthescreeningprocessforwomendiagnosedwithcervicalcancerinfourdiverseushealthcaresettings
AT winerrachell gapsinthescreeningprocessforwomendiagnosedwithcervicalcancerinfourdiverseushealthcaresettings
AT rainebennetttina gapsinthescreeningprocessforwomendiagnosedwithcervicalcancerinfourdiverseushealthcaresettings
AT feldmansarah gapsinthescreeningprocessforwomendiagnosedwithcervicalcancerinfourdiverseushealthcaresettings
AT wheelercosettem gapsinthescreeningprocessforwomendiagnosedwithcervicalcancerinfourdiverseushealthcaresettings