Cargando…
Evaluation of an artificial intelligence support system for breast cancer screening in Chinese people based on mammogram
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of radiologists on breast cancer with or without artificial intelligence (AI) support. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed. In total, 643 mammograms (average age: 54 years; female: 100%; cancer: 62.05%) were randomly allocated into two grou...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9939225/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36082949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5231 |
_version_ | 1784890801643323392 |
---|---|
author | Bao, Chengzhen Shen, Jie Zhang, Yue Zhang, Yan Wei, Wei Wang, Ziteng Ding, Jia Han, Lili |
author_facet | Bao, Chengzhen Shen, Jie Zhang, Yue Zhang, Yan Wei, Wei Wang, Ziteng Ding, Jia Han, Lili |
author_sort | Bao, Chengzhen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of radiologists on breast cancer with or without artificial intelligence (AI) support. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed. In total, 643 mammograms (average age: 54 years; female: 100%; cancer: 62.05%) were randomly allocated into two groups. Seventy‐five percent of mammograms in each group were randomly selected for assessment by two independent radiologists, and the rest were read once. Half of the 71 radiologists could read mammograms with AI support, and the other half could not. Sensitivity, specificity, Youden's index, agreement rate, Kappa value, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the reading time of radiologists in each group were analyzed. RESULTS: The average AUC was higher if the AI support system was used (unaided: 0.84; with AI support: 0.91; p < 0.01). The average sensitivity increased from 84.77% to 95.07% with AI support (p < 0.01), but the average specificity decreased (p = 0.07). Youden's index, agreement rate and Kappa value were larger in the group with AI support, and the average reading time was shorter (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The AI support system might contribute to enhancing the diagnostic performance (e.g., higher sensitivity and AUC) of radiologists. In the future, the AI algorithm should be improved, and prospective studies should be conducted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9939225 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99392252023-02-20 Evaluation of an artificial intelligence support system for breast cancer screening in Chinese people based on mammogram Bao, Chengzhen Shen, Jie Zhang, Yue Zhang, Yan Wei, Wei Wang, Ziteng Ding, Jia Han, Lili Cancer Med RESEARCH ARTICLES BACKGROUND: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of radiologists on breast cancer with or without artificial intelligence (AI) support. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed. In total, 643 mammograms (average age: 54 years; female: 100%; cancer: 62.05%) were randomly allocated into two groups. Seventy‐five percent of mammograms in each group were randomly selected for assessment by two independent radiologists, and the rest were read once. Half of the 71 radiologists could read mammograms with AI support, and the other half could not. Sensitivity, specificity, Youden's index, agreement rate, Kappa value, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the reading time of radiologists in each group were analyzed. RESULTS: The average AUC was higher if the AI support system was used (unaided: 0.84; with AI support: 0.91; p < 0.01). The average sensitivity increased from 84.77% to 95.07% with AI support (p < 0.01), but the average specificity decreased (p = 0.07). Youden's index, agreement rate and Kappa value were larger in the group with AI support, and the average reading time was shorter (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The AI support system might contribute to enhancing the diagnostic performance (e.g., higher sensitivity and AUC) of radiologists. In the future, the AI algorithm should be improved, and prospective studies should be conducted. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9939225/ /pubmed/36082949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5231 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | RESEARCH ARTICLES Bao, Chengzhen Shen, Jie Zhang, Yue Zhang, Yan Wei, Wei Wang, Ziteng Ding, Jia Han, Lili Evaluation of an artificial intelligence support system for breast cancer screening in Chinese people based on mammogram |
title | Evaluation of an artificial intelligence support system for breast cancer screening in Chinese people based on mammogram |
title_full | Evaluation of an artificial intelligence support system for breast cancer screening in Chinese people based on mammogram |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of an artificial intelligence support system for breast cancer screening in Chinese people based on mammogram |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of an artificial intelligence support system for breast cancer screening in Chinese people based on mammogram |
title_short | Evaluation of an artificial intelligence support system for breast cancer screening in Chinese people based on mammogram |
title_sort | evaluation of an artificial intelligence support system for breast cancer screening in chinese people based on mammogram |
topic | RESEARCH ARTICLES |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9939225/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36082949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5231 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baochengzhen evaluationofanartificialintelligencesupportsystemforbreastcancerscreeninginchinesepeoplebasedonmammogram AT shenjie evaluationofanartificialintelligencesupportsystemforbreastcancerscreeninginchinesepeoplebasedonmammogram AT zhangyue evaluationofanartificialintelligencesupportsystemforbreastcancerscreeninginchinesepeoplebasedonmammogram AT zhangyan evaluationofanartificialintelligencesupportsystemforbreastcancerscreeninginchinesepeoplebasedonmammogram AT weiwei evaluationofanartificialintelligencesupportsystemforbreastcancerscreeninginchinesepeoplebasedonmammogram AT wangziteng evaluationofanartificialintelligencesupportsystemforbreastcancerscreeninginchinesepeoplebasedonmammogram AT dingjia evaluationofanartificialintelligencesupportsystemforbreastcancerscreeninginchinesepeoplebasedonmammogram AT hanlili evaluationofanartificialintelligencesupportsystemforbreastcancerscreeninginchinesepeoplebasedonmammogram |