Cargando…

Academic dishonesty by students of bioethics at a tertiary institution in Australia: an exploratory study

BACKGROUND: Institutions of higher learning are persistently struggling with issues of academic dishonesty such as plagiarism, despite the availability of university policies and guidelines for upholding academic integrity. METHODOLOGY: This was a descriptive qualitative study conducted on 37 studen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mukasa, Jean, Stokes, Linda, Mukona, Doreen Macherera
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Nature Singapore 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9939252/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00124-5
_version_ 1784890806663905280
author Mukasa, Jean
Stokes, Linda
Mukona, Doreen Macherera
author_facet Mukasa, Jean
Stokes, Linda
Mukona, Doreen Macherera
author_sort Mukasa, Jean
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Institutions of higher learning are persistently struggling with issues of academic dishonesty such as plagiarism, despite the availability of university policies and guidelines for upholding academic integrity. METHODOLOGY: This was a descriptive qualitative study conducted on 37 students of a Healthcare Ethics course at an Australian tertiary institution from February 2016 to October 2018. The purpose of the study was to explore the reasons for plagiarism detected the Turnitin(R) plagiarism checking software and extensive review of manuscripts. The interviews were conducted in private rooms and in strict confidence. Thematic analysis was manually done. RESULTS: Four major themes namely, lack of interest; pressure of time with competing priorities; lack of understanding of the policy on academic honesty, and “the determined students” were identified. Sub themes under lack of interest were lack of preparation and effort, low self-efficacy, poor studying techniques, and convenience of internet sources. Under pressure of time, the subthemes were, misplaced priorities, procrastination, high workloads, poor planning, competing interests, and the perception of availability of time at the start of the semester. Regarding lack of understanding of the policy on academic honesty, the subthemes identified were, lake of awareness of plagiarism, lack of awareness of acceptable similarity, conflicting messages from tutors and confusion with high school learning. The determined students were those that either made all effort to reduce plagiarism but still remained high, used the another language at home other than English, had poor paraphrasing techniques or lacked resources for English language editing. CONCLUSION: There are varied and diverse reasons for plagiarism. There is a need to systematically reinforce and educate students on issues pertaining to academic dishonesty and their associated implications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9939252
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Nature Singapore
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99392522023-02-21 Academic dishonesty by students of bioethics at a tertiary institution in Australia: an exploratory study Mukasa, Jean Stokes, Linda Mukona, Doreen Macherera Int J Educ Integr Original Article BACKGROUND: Institutions of higher learning are persistently struggling with issues of academic dishonesty such as plagiarism, despite the availability of university policies and guidelines for upholding academic integrity. METHODOLOGY: This was a descriptive qualitative study conducted on 37 students of a Healthcare Ethics course at an Australian tertiary institution from February 2016 to October 2018. The purpose of the study was to explore the reasons for plagiarism detected the Turnitin(R) plagiarism checking software and extensive review of manuscripts. The interviews were conducted in private rooms and in strict confidence. Thematic analysis was manually done. RESULTS: Four major themes namely, lack of interest; pressure of time with competing priorities; lack of understanding of the policy on academic honesty, and “the determined students” were identified. Sub themes under lack of interest were lack of preparation and effort, low self-efficacy, poor studying techniques, and convenience of internet sources. Under pressure of time, the subthemes were, misplaced priorities, procrastination, high workloads, poor planning, competing interests, and the perception of availability of time at the start of the semester. Regarding lack of understanding of the policy on academic honesty, the subthemes identified were, lake of awareness of plagiarism, lack of awareness of acceptable similarity, conflicting messages from tutors and confusion with high school learning. The determined students were those that either made all effort to reduce plagiarism but still remained high, used the another language at home other than English, had poor paraphrasing techniques or lacked resources for English language editing. CONCLUSION: There are varied and diverse reasons for plagiarism. There is a need to systematically reinforce and educate students on issues pertaining to academic dishonesty and their associated implications. Springer Nature Singapore 2023-02-20 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9939252/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00124-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mukasa, Jean
Stokes, Linda
Mukona, Doreen Macherera
Academic dishonesty by students of bioethics at a tertiary institution in Australia: an exploratory study
title Academic dishonesty by students of bioethics at a tertiary institution in Australia: an exploratory study
title_full Academic dishonesty by students of bioethics at a tertiary institution in Australia: an exploratory study
title_fullStr Academic dishonesty by students of bioethics at a tertiary institution in Australia: an exploratory study
title_full_unstemmed Academic dishonesty by students of bioethics at a tertiary institution in Australia: an exploratory study
title_short Academic dishonesty by students of bioethics at a tertiary institution in Australia: an exploratory study
title_sort academic dishonesty by students of bioethics at a tertiary institution in australia: an exploratory study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9939252/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00124-5
work_keys_str_mv AT mukasajean academicdishonestybystudentsofbioethicsatatertiaryinstitutioninaustraliaanexploratorystudy
AT stokeslinda academicdishonestybystudentsofbioethicsatatertiaryinstitutioninaustraliaanexploratorystudy
AT mukonadoreenmacherera academicdishonestybystudentsofbioethicsatatertiaryinstitutioninaustraliaanexploratorystudy