Cargando…
The evolution of intergroup cooperation
Sociality is widespread among animals, and involves complex relationships within and between social groups. While intragroup interactions are often cooperative, intergroup interactions typically involve conflict, or at best tolerance. Active cooperation between members of distinct, separate groups o...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9939261/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36802776 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2022.0074 |
_version_ | 1784890808131911680 |
---|---|
author | Rodrigues, António M. M. Barker, Jessica L. Robinson, Elva J. H. |
author_facet | Rodrigues, António M. M. Barker, Jessica L. Robinson, Elva J. H. |
author_sort | Rodrigues, António M. M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Sociality is widespread among animals, and involves complex relationships within and between social groups. While intragroup interactions are often cooperative, intergroup interactions typically involve conflict, or at best tolerance. Active cooperation between members of distinct, separate groups occurs very rarely, predominantly in some primate and ant species. Here, we ask why intergroup cooperation is so rare, and what conditions favour its evolution. We present a model incorporating intra- and intergroup relationships and local and long-distance dispersal. We show that dispersal modes play a pivotal role in the evolution of intergroup interactions. Both long-distance and local dispersal processes drive population social structure, and the costs and benefits of intergroup conflict, tolerance and cooperation. Overall, the evolution of multi-group interaction patterns, including both intergroup aggression and intergroup tolerance, or even altruism, is more likely with mostly localized dispersal. However, the evolution of these intergroup relationships may have significant ecological impacts, and this feedback may alter the ecological conditions that favour its own evolution. These results show that the evolution of intergroup cooperation is favoured by a specific set of conditions, and may not be evolutionarily stable. We discuss how our results relate to empirical evidence of intergroup cooperation in ants and primates. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue ‘Collective behaviour through time’. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9939261 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99392612023-05-30 The evolution of intergroup cooperation Rodrigues, António M. M. Barker, Jessica L. Robinson, Elva J. H. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Articles Sociality is widespread among animals, and involves complex relationships within and between social groups. While intragroup interactions are often cooperative, intergroup interactions typically involve conflict, or at best tolerance. Active cooperation between members of distinct, separate groups occurs very rarely, predominantly in some primate and ant species. Here, we ask why intergroup cooperation is so rare, and what conditions favour its evolution. We present a model incorporating intra- and intergroup relationships and local and long-distance dispersal. We show that dispersal modes play a pivotal role in the evolution of intergroup interactions. Both long-distance and local dispersal processes drive population social structure, and the costs and benefits of intergroup conflict, tolerance and cooperation. Overall, the evolution of multi-group interaction patterns, including both intergroup aggression and intergroup tolerance, or even altruism, is more likely with mostly localized dispersal. However, the evolution of these intergroup relationships may have significant ecological impacts, and this feedback may alter the ecological conditions that favour its own evolution. These results show that the evolution of intergroup cooperation is favoured by a specific set of conditions, and may not be evolutionarily stable. We discuss how our results relate to empirical evidence of intergroup cooperation in ants and primates. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue ‘Collective behaviour through time’. The Royal Society 2023-04-10 2023-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9939261/ /pubmed/36802776 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2022.0074 Text en © 2023 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Articles Rodrigues, António M. M. Barker, Jessica L. Robinson, Elva J. H. The evolution of intergroup cooperation |
title | The evolution of intergroup cooperation |
title_full | The evolution of intergroup cooperation |
title_fullStr | The evolution of intergroup cooperation |
title_full_unstemmed | The evolution of intergroup cooperation |
title_short | The evolution of intergroup cooperation |
title_sort | evolution of intergroup cooperation |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9939261/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36802776 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2022.0074 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rodriguesantoniomm theevolutionofintergroupcooperation AT barkerjessical theevolutionofintergroupcooperation AT robinsonelvajh theevolutionofintergroupcooperation AT rodriguesantoniomm evolutionofintergroupcooperation AT barkerjessical evolutionofintergroupcooperation AT robinsonelvajh evolutionofintergroupcooperation |