Cargando…

Robotic CME in obese patients: advantage of robotic ultrasound scan for vascular dissection

Complete mesocolic excision (CME) in right-sided colon cancers appears to confer oncological benefits compared to conventional colectomy. Identification of the superior mesenteric vein (SMV) remains challenging. We describe the novel use of intra-operative robotic ultrasound scan (rUSS) in obese pat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maertens, Vicky, Stefan, Samuel, Mykoniatis, Ioannis, Siddiqi, Najaf, David, Gerald, Khan, Jim S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer London 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9939489/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35428945
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-022-01398-6
_version_ 1784890864832610304
author Maertens, Vicky
Stefan, Samuel
Mykoniatis, Ioannis
Siddiqi, Najaf
David, Gerald
Khan, Jim S.
author_facet Maertens, Vicky
Stefan, Samuel
Mykoniatis, Ioannis
Siddiqi, Najaf
David, Gerald
Khan, Jim S.
author_sort Maertens, Vicky
collection PubMed
description Complete mesocolic excision (CME) in right-sided colon cancers appears to confer oncological benefits compared to conventional colectomy. Identification of the superior mesenteric vein (SMV) remains challenging. We describe the novel use of intra-operative robotic ultrasound scan (rUSS) in obese patients (BMI ≥ 29). All consecutive patients having robotic CME for colon cancer between 2014 and 2017 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Data were recorded on an ethics approved prospective database and included patient demographics, clinical and oncological outcomes. Patients were divided into group 1 (BMI ≤ 28) and group 2 (BMI ≥ 29). SMV first approach was employed in all cases and SMV detection was aided using rUSS in group 2. Primary outcome was postoperative morbidity. Secondary outcomes included conversion rate, operative time and length of stay (LOS). 41 (group 1, median 66 years) were compared to 32 patients (group 2, median 63 years). There were no conversions to laparoscopy or laparotomy. Median operative times for group 2 were 30 min longer (186 vs. 216 min, p = 0.05). Overall morbidity was similar (20% vs. 19% in group 1 and 2, p = 0.26). There was no significant difference between the two groups with regard to LOS (median 7 vs. 6 days, p = 0.48), readmissions (2 vs. 5, p = 0.13), R0 resection rate (98% vs. 94%, p = 0.43) and lymph node harvest (median 31 vs. 30, p = 0.28).CME can be technically more challenging than conventional colectomy in obese patients and is associated with longer operative times. The use of rUSS in obese patients can help to identify SMV and allow safer dissection. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11701-022-01398-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9939489
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer London
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99394892023-02-21 Robotic CME in obese patients: advantage of robotic ultrasound scan for vascular dissection Maertens, Vicky Stefan, Samuel Mykoniatis, Ioannis Siddiqi, Najaf David, Gerald Khan, Jim S. J Robot Surg Original Article Complete mesocolic excision (CME) in right-sided colon cancers appears to confer oncological benefits compared to conventional colectomy. Identification of the superior mesenteric vein (SMV) remains challenging. We describe the novel use of intra-operative robotic ultrasound scan (rUSS) in obese patients (BMI ≥ 29). All consecutive patients having robotic CME for colon cancer between 2014 and 2017 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Data were recorded on an ethics approved prospective database and included patient demographics, clinical and oncological outcomes. Patients were divided into group 1 (BMI ≤ 28) and group 2 (BMI ≥ 29). SMV first approach was employed in all cases and SMV detection was aided using rUSS in group 2. Primary outcome was postoperative morbidity. Secondary outcomes included conversion rate, operative time and length of stay (LOS). 41 (group 1, median 66 years) were compared to 32 patients (group 2, median 63 years). There were no conversions to laparoscopy or laparotomy. Median operative times for group 2 were 30 min longer (186 vs. 216 min, p = 0.05). Overall morbidity was similar (20% vs. 19% in group 1 and 2, p = 0.26). There was no significant difference between the two groups with regard to LOS (median 7 vs. 6 days, p = 0.48), readmissions (2 vs. 5, p = 0.13), R0 resection rate (98% vs. 94%, p = 0.43) and lymph node harvest (median 31 vs. 30, p = 0.28).CME can be technically more challenging than conventional colectomy in obese patients and is associated with longer operative times. The use of rUSS in obese patients can help to identify SMV and allow safer dissection. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11701-022-01398-6. Springer London 2022-04-15 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9939489/ /pubmed/35428945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-022-01398-6 Text en © Crown 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Maertens, Vicky
Stefan, Samuel
Mykoniatis, Ioannis
Siddiqi, Najaf
David, Gerald
Khan, Jim S.
Robotic CME in obese patients: advantage of robotic ultrasound scan for vascular dissection
title Robotic CME in obese patients: advantage of robotic ultrasound scan for vascular dissection
title_full Robotic CME in obese patients: advantage of robotic ultrasound scan for vascular dissection
title_fullStr Robotic CME in obese patients: advantage of robotic ultrasound scan for vascular dissection
title_full_unstemmed Robotic CME in obese patients: advantage of robotic ultrasound scan for vascular dissection
title_short Robotic CME in obese patients: advantage of robotic ultrasound scan for vascular dissection
title_sort robotic cme in obese patients: advantage of robotic ultrasound scan for vascular dissection
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9939489/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35428945
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-022-01398-6
work_keys_str_mv AT maertensvicky roboticcmeinobesepatientsadvantageofroboticultrasoundscanforvasculardissection
AT stefansamuel roboticcmeinobesepatientsadvantageofroboticultrasoundscanforvasculardissection
AT mykoniatisioannis roboticcmeinobesepatientsadvantageofroboticultrasoundscanforvasculardissection
AT siddiqinajaf roboticcmeinobesepatientsadvantageofroboticultrasoundscanforvasculardissection
AT davidgerald roboticcmeinobesepatientsadvantageofroboticultrasoundscanforvasculardissection
AT khanjims roboticcmeinobesepatientsadvantageofroboticultrasoundscanforvasculardissection