Cargando…

3D printed patient-specific prostate cancer models to guide nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review

Precise knowledge of each patient’s index cancer and surrounding anatomy is required for nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (NS-RARP). Complementary to this, 3D printing has proven its utility in improving the visualisation of complex anatomy. This is the first systematic review to c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coles-Black, Jasamine, Ong, Sean, Teh, Jiasian, Kearns, Paul, Ischia, Joseph, Bolton, Damien, Lawrentschuk, Nathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer London 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9939493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35349074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-022-01401-0
_version_ 1784890865555079168
author Coles-Black, Jasamine
Ong, Sean
Teh, Jiasian
Kearns, Paul
Ischia, Joseph
Bolton, Damien
Lawrentschuk, Nathan
author_facet Coles-Black, Jasamine
Ong, Sean
Teh, Jiasian
Kearns, Paul
Ischia, Joseph
Bolton, Damien
Lawrentschuk, Nathan
author_sort Coles-Black, Jasamine
collection PubMed
description Precise knowledge of each patient’s index cancer and surrounding anatomy is required for nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (NS-RARP). Complementary to this, 3D printing has proven its utility in improving the visualisation of complex anatomy. This is the first systematic review to critically assess the potential of 3D printed patient-specific prostate cancer models in improving visualisation and the practice of NS-RARP. A literature search of PubMed and OVID Medline databases was performed using the terms “3D Printing”, “Robot Assisted Radical Prostatectomy” and related index terms as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Eight articles were included; six were identified via database searches, to which a further two articles were located via a snowballing approach. Eight papers were identified for review. There were five prospective single centre studies, one case series, one technical report and one letter to the editor. Of these articles, five publications (62.5%) reported on the utility of 3D printed models for NS-RARP planning. Two publications (25%) utilised 3D printed prostate models for simulation and training, and two publications (25%) used the models for patient engagement. Despite the nascency of the field, 3D printed models are emerging in the uro-oncological literature as a useful tool in visualising complex anatomy. This has proven useful in NS-RARP for preoperative planning, simulation and patient engagement. However, best practice guidelines, the future regulatory landscape, and health economic considerations need to be addressed before this synergy of new technologies is ready for the mainstream. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11701-022-01401-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9939493
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer London
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99394932023-02-21 3D printed patient-specific prostate cancer models to guide nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review Coles-Black, Jasamine Ong, Sean Teh, Jiasian Kearns, Paul Ischia, Joseph Bolton, Damien Lawrentschuk, Nathan J Robot Surg Review Article Precise knowledge of each patient’s index cancer and surrounding anatomy is required for nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (NS-RARP). Complementary to this, 3D printing has proven its utility in improving the visualisation of complex anatomy. This is the first systematic review to critically assess the potential of 3D printed patient-specific prostate cancer models in improving visualisation and the practice of NS-RARP. A literature search of PubMed and OVID Medline databases was performed using the terms “3D Printing”, “Robot Assisted Radical Prostatectomy” and related index terms as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Eight articles were included; six were identified via database searches, to which a further two articles were located via a snowballing approach. Eight papers were identified for review. There were five prospective single centre studies, one case series, one technical report and one letter to the editor. Of these articles, five publications (62.5%) reported on the utility of 3D printed models for NS-RARP planning. Two publications (25%) utilised 3D printed prostate models for simulation and training, and two publications (25%) used the models for patient engagement. Despite the nascency of the field, 3D printed models are emerging in the uro-oncological literature as a useful tool in visualising complex anatomy. This has proven useful in NS-RARP for preoperative planning, simulation and patient engagement. However, best practice guidelines, the future regulatory landscape, and health economic considerations need to be addressed before this synergy of new technologies is ready for the mainstream. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11701-022-01401-0. Springer London 2022-03-29 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9939493/ /pubmed/35349074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-022-01401-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article
Coles-Black, Jasamine
Ong, Sean
Teh, Jiasian
Kearns, Paul
Ischia, Joseph
Bolton, Damien
Lawrentschuk, Nathan
3D printed patient-specific prostate cancer models to guide nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review
title 3D printed patient-specific prostate cancer models to guide nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review
title_full 3D printed patient-specific prostate cancer models to guide nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review
title_fullStr 3D printed patient-specific prostate cancer models to guide nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed 3D printed patient-specific prostate cancer models to guide nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review
title_short 3D printed patient-specific prostate cancer models to guide nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review
title_sort 3d printed patient-specific prostate cancer models to guide nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9939493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35349074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-022-01401-0
work_keys_str_mv AT colesblackjasamine 3dprintedpatientspecificprostatecancermodelstoguidenervesparingrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyasystematicreview
AT ongsean 3dprintedpatientspecificprostatecancermodelstoguidenervesparingrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyasystematicreview
AT tehjiasian 3dprintedpatientspecificprostatecancermodelstoguidenervesparingrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyasystematicreview
AT kearnspaul 3dprintedpatientspecificprostatecancermodelstoguidenervesparingrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyasystematicreview
AT ischiajoseph 3dprintedpatientspecificprostatecancermodelstoguidenervesparingrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyasystematicreview
AT boltondamien 3dprintedpatientspecificprostatecancermodelstoguidenervesparingrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyasystematicreview
AT lawrentschuknathan 3dprintedpatientspecificprostatecancermodelstoguidenervesparingrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyasystematicreview