Cargando…

Construction and validation of a cuproptosis-related prognostic model for glioblastoma

BACKGROUND: Cuproptosis, a newly reported type of programmed cell death, takes part in the regulation of tumor progression, treatment response, and prognosis. But the specific effect of cuproptosis-related genes (CRGs) on glioblastoma (GBM) is still unclear. METHODS: The transcriptome data and corre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Bohong, Xie, Lin, Liu, Jiahao, Liu, Anmin, He, Mingliang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9939522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36814929
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1082974
_version_ 1784890872776622080
author Zhang, Bohong
Xie, Lin
Liu, Jiahao
Liu, Anmin
He, Mingliang
author_facet Zhang, Bohong
Xie, Lin
Liu, Jiahao
Liu, Anmin
He, Mingliang
author_sort Zhang, Bohong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cuproptosis, a newly reported type of programmed cell death, takes part in the regulation of tumor progression, treatment response, and prognosis. But the specific effect of cuproptosis-related genes (CRGs) on glioblastoma (GBM) is still unclear. METHODS: The transcriptome data and corresponding clinical data of GBM samples were downloaded from the TCGA and GEO databases. R software and R packages were used to perform statistical analysis, consensus cluster analysis, survival analysis, Cox regression analysis, Lasso regression analysis, and tumor microenvironment analysis. The mRNA and protein expression levels of model-related genes were detected by RT-qPCR and Western blot assays, respectively. RESULTS: The expression profile of CRGs in 209 GBM samples from two separate datasets was obtained. Two cuproptosis subtypes, CRGcluster A and CRGcluster B, were identified by consensus cluster analysis. There were apparent differences in prognosis, tumor microenvironment, and immune checkpoint expression levels between the two subtypes, and there were 79 prognostic differentially expressed genes (DEGs). According to the prognostic DEGs, two gene subtypes, geneCluster A and geneCluster B, were identified, and a prognostic risk score model was constructed and validated. This model consists of five prognostic DEGs, including PDIA4, DUSP6, PTPRN, PILRB, and CBLN1. Ultimately, to improve the applicability of the model, a nomogram was established. Patients with GBM in the low-risk cluster have a higher mutation burden and predict a longer OS than in the high-risk group. Moreover, the risk score was related to drug sensitivity and negatively correlated with the CSC index. CONCLUSION: We successfully constructed a cuproptosis-related prognostic model, which can independently predict the prognosis of GBM patients. These results further complement the understanding of cuproptosis and provide new theoretical support for developing a more effective treatment strategy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9939522
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99395222023-02-21 Construction and validation of a cuproptosis-related prognostic model for glioblastoma Zhang, Bohong Xie, Lin Liu, Jiahao Liu, Anmin He, Mingliang Front Immunol Immunology BACKGROUND: Cuproptosis, a newly reported type of programmed cell death, takes part in the regulation of tumor progression, treatment response, and prognosis. But the specific effect of cuproptosis-related genes (CRGs) on glioblastoma (GBM) is still unclear. METHODS: The transcriptome data and corresponding clinical data of GBM samples were downloaded from the TCGA and GEO databases. R software and R packages were used to perform statistical analysis, consensus cluster analysis, survival analysis, Cox regression analysis, Lasso regression analysis, and tumor microenvironment analysis. The mRNA and protein expression levels of model-related genes were detected by RT-qPCR and Western blot assays, respectively. RESULTS: The expression profile of CRGs in 209 GBM samples from two separate datasets was obtained. Two cuproptosis subtypes, CRGcluster A and CRGcluster B, were identified by consensus cluster analysis. There were apparent differences in prognosis, tumor microenvironment, and immune checkpoint expression levels between the two subtypes, and there were 79 prognostic differentially expressed genes (DEGs). According to the prognostic DEGs, two gene subtypes, geneCluster A and geneCluster B, were identified, and a prognostic risk score model was constructed and validated. This model consists of five prognostic DEGs, including PDIA4, DUSP6, PTPRN, PILRB, and CBLN1. Ultimately, to improve the applicability of the model, a nomogram was established. Patients with GBM in the low-risk cluster have a higher mutation burden and predict a longer OS than in the high-risk group. Moreover, the risk score was related to drug sensitivity and negatively correlated with the CSC index. CONCLUSION: We successfully constructed a cuproptosis-related prognostic model, which can independently predict the prognosis of GBM patients. These results further complement the understanding of cuproptosis and provide new theoretical support for developing a more effective treatment strategy. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9939522/ /pubmed/36814929 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1082974 Text en Copyright © 2023 Zhang, Xie, Liu, Liu and He https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Immunology
Zhang, Bohong
Xie, Lin
Liu, Jiahao
Liu, Anmin
He, Mingliang
Construction and validation of a cuproptosis-related prognostic model for glioblastoma
title Construction and validation of a cuproptosis-related prognostic model for glioblastoma
title_full Construction and validation of a cuproptosis-related prognostic model for glioblastoma
title_fullStr Construction and validation of a cuproptosis-related prognostic model for glioblastoma
title_full_unstemmed Construction and validation of a cuproptosis-related prognostic model for glioblastoma
title_short Construction and validation of a cuproptosis-related prognostic model for glioblastoma
title_sort construction and validation of a cuproptosis-related prognostic model for glioblastoma
topic Immunology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9939522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36814929
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1082974
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangbohong constructionandvalidationofacuproptosisrelatedprognosticmodelforglioblastoma
AT xielin constructionandvalidationofacuproptosisrelatedprognosticmodelforglioblastoma
AT liujiahao constructionandvalidationofacuproptosisrelatedprognosticmodelforglioblastoma
AT liuanmin constructionandvalidationofacuproptosisrelatedprognosticmodelforglioblastoma
AT hemingliang constructionandvalidationofacuproptosisrelatedprognosticmodelforglioblastoma