Cargando…

Dilemma of belimumab therapy (dis)continuation during pregnancy: Results of a retrospective study in eudravigilance

INTRODUCTION: The first biologic authorized for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) up to this date, belimumab, is currently not recommended for use during pregnancy due to lack of data. Provided that the health of the child begins with the health of the mother, pregnant patients face the dilemma of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ghalandari, Nafise, Crijns, Hubertina JMJ, Dolhain, Radboud JEM, Hazes, Johanna MW, van Puijenbroek, Eugene P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9939929/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36448410
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09612033221143286
_version_ 1784890971407777792
author Ghalandari, Nafise
Crijns, Hubertina JMJ
Dolhain, Radboud JEM
Hazes, Johanna MW
van Puijenbroek, Eugene P
author_facet Ghalandari, Nafise
Crijns, Hubertina JMJ
Dolhain, Radboud JEM
Hazes, Johanna MW
van Puijenbroek, Eugene P
author_sort Ghalandari, Nafise
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The first biologic authorized for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) up to this date, belimumab, is currently not recommended for use during pregnancy due to lack of data. Provided that the health of the child begins with the health of the mother, pregnant patients face the dilemma of cessation or continuation of belimumab. If belimumab is stopped, there will be a risk of SLE flare and its consequences for the mother and the foetus. Continuation is also not optimal because of the lack of knowledge on safety for use during pregnancy. AIM: To compare the reported foetal outcomes in SLE patients who stopped scheduled belimumab within the first trimester (group A) and those who continued scheduled belimumab during the first trimester or thereafter (group B). MATERIAL AND METHOD: All belimumab-exposed pregnancy-related reports were extracted from the EudraVigilance (EV) database until March 11th, 2021. After case review, repeated cases, uninformative reports, non-medical elective abortions and foetal chromosomal abnormalities were excluded. Included pregnancies were divided into two groups (group A and B, as described above). Foetal outcomes were divided into live birth or foetal death (due to miscarriage or stillbirth) and were compared between both groups. Furthermore, neonatal outcomes, such as reporting rates of preterm birth, low birth weight and major congenital malformations were compared. RESULTS: No statistical difference in foetal death was observed between group A and B (reported numbers (%) = 32 (46.4) and 11 (52.4), respectively). Odds ratio (OR, [95% Confidence Intervals (CIs)]) of foetal death in group B compared to group A was 1.27 [0.48, 3.32]. Reporting rates of preterm birth and low birth weight were higher – though not statistically different – in group A. CONCLUSION: The positive results of our study are supportive for the continuation of belimumab during pregnancy. Since the analysis is based on spontaneous reports/retrospective data, additional studies are needed to confirm the results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9939929
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99399292023-02-21 Dilemma of belimumab therapy (dis)continuation during pregnancy: Results of a retrospective study in eudravigilance Ghalandari, Nafise Crijns, Hubertina JMJ Dolhain, Radboud JEM Hazes, Johanna MW van Puijenbroek, Eugene P Lupus Papers INTRODUCTION: The first biologic authorized for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) up to this date, belimumab, is currently not recommended for use during pregnancy due to lack of data. Provided that the health of the child begins with the health of the mother, pregnant patients face the dilemma of cessation or continuation of belimumab. If belimumab is stopped, there will be a risk of SLE flare and its consequences for the mother and the foetus. Continuation is also not optimal because of the lack of knowledge on safety for use during pregnancy. AIM: To compare the reported foetal outcomes in SLE patients who stopped scheduled belimumab within the first trimester (group A) and those who continued scheduled belimumab during the first trimester or thereafter (group B). MATERIAL AND METHOD: All belimumab-exposed pregnancy-related reports were extracted from the EudraVigilance (EV) database until March 11th, 2021. After case review, repeated cases, uninformative reports, non-medical elective abortions and foetal chromosomal abnormalities were excluded. Included pregnancies were divided into two groups (group A and B, as described above). Foetal outcomes were divided into live birth or foetal death (due to miscarriage or stillbirth) and were compared between both groups. Furthermore, neonatal outcomes, such as reporting rates of preterm birth, low birth weight and major congenital malformations were compared. RESULTS: No statistical difference in foetal death was observed between group A and B (reported numbers (%) = 32 (46.4) and 11 (52.4), respectively). Odds ratio (OR, [95% Confidence Intervals (CIs)]) of foetal death in group B compared to group A was 1.27 [0.48, 3.32]. Reporting rates of preterm birth and low birth weight were higher – though not statistically different – in group A. CONCLUSION: The positive results of our study are supportive for the continuation of belimumab during pregnancy. Since the analysis is based on spontaneous reports/retrospective data, additional studies are needed to confirm the results. SAGE Publications 2022-11-30 2023-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9939929/ /pubmed/36448410 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09612033221143286 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Papers
Ghalandari, Nafise
Crijns, Hubertina JMJ
Dolhain, Radboud JEM
Hazes, Johanna MW
van Puijenbroek, Eugene P
Dilemma of belimumab therapy (dis)continuation during pregnancy: Results of a retrospective study in eudravigilance
title Dilemma of belimumab therapy (dis)continuation during pregnancy: Results of a retrospective study in eudravigilance
title_full Dilemma of belimumab therapy (dis)continuation during pregnancy: Results of a retrospective study in eudravigilance
title_fullStr Dilemma of belimumab therapy (dis)continuation during pregnancy: Results of a retrospective study in eudravigilance
title_full_unstemmed Dilemma of belimumab therapy (dis)continuation during pregnancy: Results of a retrospective study in eudravigilance
title_short Dilemma of belimumab therapy (dis)continuation during pregnancy: Results of a retrospective study in eudravigilance
title_sort dilemma of belimumab therapy (dis)continuation during pregnancy: results of a retrospective study in eudravigilance
topic Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9939929/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36448410
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09612033221143286
work_keys_str_mv AT ghalandarinafise dilemmaofbelimumabtherapydiscontinuationduringpregnancyresultsofaretrospectivestudyineudravigilance
AT crijnshubertinajmj dilemmaofbelimumabtherapydiscontinuationduringpregnancyresultsofaretrospectivestudyineudravigilance
AT dolhainradboudjem dilemmaofbelimumabtherapydiscontinuationduringpregnancyresultsofaretrospectivestudyineudravigilance
AT hazesjohannamw dilemmaofbelimumabtherapydiscontinuationduringpregnancyresultsofaretrospectivestudyineudravigilance
AT vanpuijenbroekeugenep dilemmaofbelimumabtherapydiscontinuationduringpregnancyresultsofaretrospectivestudyineudravigilance