Cargando…

Effect of vitamin D supplementation versus placebo on recovery delay among COVID-19 Tunisian patients: a randomized-controlled clinical trial

INTRODUCTION: The present study aimed to determine the impact of vitamin D supplementation (VDs) on recovery delay among COVID-19 patients. METHODS: We performed a randomized controlled clinical trial at the national COVID-19 containment center in Monastir (Tunisia), from May to August 2020. Simple...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abroug, Hela, Maatouk, Amani, Bennasrallah, Cyrine, Dhouib, Wafa, Ben Fredj, Manel, Zemni, Imen, Kacem, Meriem, Mhalla, Salma, Nouira, Sarra, Ben Belgacem, Manel, Nasri, Aymen, Klii, Rim, Loussaief, Chawki, Ben Alya, Nissaf, Bouanene, Ines, Belguith Sriha, Asma
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9940050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36803273
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07114-5
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: The present study aimed to determine the impact of vitamin D supplementation (VDs) on recovery delay among COVID-19 patients. METHODS: We performed a randomized controlled clinical trial at the national COVID-19 containment center in Monastir (Tunisia), from May to August 2020. Simple randomization was done in a 1:1 allocation ratio. We included patients aged more than 18 years who had confirmed reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and who remained positive on the 14th day. The intervention group received VDs (200,000 IU/1 ml of cholecalciferol); the control group received a placebo treatment (physiological saline (1 ml)). We measured the recovery delay and the cycle threshold (Ct) values in RT-PCR for the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The log-rank test and hazard ratios (HR) were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 117 patients were enrolled. The mean age was 42.7 years (SD 14). Males represented 55.6%. The median duration of viral RNA conversion was 37 days (95% confidence interval (CI): 29–45.50) in the intervention group and 28 days (95% CI: 23–39) in the placebo group (p=0.010). HR was 1.58 (95% CI: 1.09–2.29, p=0.015). Ct values revealed a stable trend over time in both groups. CONCLUSION: VDs was not associated with a shortened recovery delay when given to patients for whom the RT-PCR remained positive on the 14th day. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was approved by the Human Subjects Protection Tunisia center (TN2020-NAT-INS-40) on April 28, 2020, and by ClinicalTrial.gov on May 12, 2021 with approval number ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04883203.