Cargando…
The Dobbs Decision and the Future of Occupational Health in the US
Access to abortion care has a profound impact on women’s ability to participate in the workforce. In the US, restrictions on abortion care have waxed and waned over the years, including periods when abortion was broadly permitted across the nation for most pregnant people for a substantial proportio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9940085/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36843836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41542-023-00143-1 |
_version_ | 1784891005508517888 |
---|---|
author | Bergman, Mindy E. Gaskins, Vanessa A. Allen, Tammy Cheung, Ho Kwan Hebl, Mikki King, Eden B. Sinclair, Robert R. Siuta, Rose L. Wolfe, Corrine Zelin, Alexandra I. |
author_facet | Bergman, Mindy E. Gaskins, Vanessa A. Allen, Tammy Cheung, Ho Kwan Hebl, Mikki King, Eden B. Sinclair, Robert R. Siuta, Rose L. Wolfe, Corrine Zelin, Alexandra I. |
author_sort | Bergman, Mindy E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Access to abortion care has a profound impact on women’s ability to participate in the workforce. In the US, restrictions on abortion care have waxed and waned over the years, including periods when abortion was broadly permitted across the nation for most pregnant people for a substantial proportion of pregnancy and times when restrictions varied across states, including states where abortion is banned for nearly all reasons. Additionally, access to abortion care has always been a reproductive justice issue, with some people more able to access this care than others even when it is structurally available. In June 2022, the US Supreme Court handed down the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, returning to states the ability to determine restrictions on abortion, including near-total bans on abortion. In this anthology, ten experts share their perspectives on what the Dobbs decision means for the future, how it will exacerbate existing, well-researched issues, and likely also create new challenges needing investigation. Some contributions are focused on research directions, some focus on implications for organizations, and most include both. All contributions share relevant occupational health literature and describe the effects of the Dobbs decision in context. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9940085 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99400852023-02-21 The Dobbs Decision and the Future of Occupational Health in the US Bergman, Mindy E. Gaskins, Vanessa A. Allen, Tammy Cheung, Ho Kwan Hebl, Mikki King, Eden B. Sinclair, Robert R. Siuta, Rose L. Wolfe, Corrine Zelin, Alexandra I. Occup Health Sci Review Article Access to abortion care has a profound impact on women’s ability to participate in the workforce. In the US, restrictions on abortion care have waxed and waned over the years, including periods when abortion was broadly permitted across the nation for most pregnant people for a substantial proportion of pregnancy and times when restrictions varied across states, including states where abortion is banned for nearly all reasons. Additionally, access to abortion care has always been a reproductive justice issue, with some people more able to access this care than others even when it is structurally available. In June 2022, the US Supreme Court handed down the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, returning to states the ability to determine restrictions on abortion, including near-total bans on abortion. In this anthology, ten experts share their perspectives on what the Dobbs decision means for the future, how it will exacerbate existing, well-researched issues, and likely also create new challenges needing investigation. Some contributions are focused on research directions, some focus on implications for organizations, and most include both. All contributions share relevant occupational health literature and describe the effects of the Dobbs decision in context. Springer International Publishing 2023-02-20 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9940085/ /pubmed/36843836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41542-023-00143-1 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Bergman, Mindy E. Gaskins, Vanessa A. Allen, Tammy Cheung, Ho Kwan Hebl, Mikki King, Eden B. Sinclair, Robert R. Siuta, Rose L. Wolfe, Corrine Zelin, Alexandra I. The Dobbs Decision and the Future of Occupational Health in the US |
title | The Dobbs Decision and the Future of Occupational Health in the US |
title_full | The Dobbs Decision and the Future of Occupational Health in the US |
title_fullStr | The Dobbs Decision and the Future of Occupational Health in the US |
title_full_unstemmed | The Dobbs Decision and the Future of Occupational Health in the US |
title_short | The Dobbs Decision and the Future of Occupational Health in the US |
title_sort | dobbs decision and the future of occupational health in the us |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9940085/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36843836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41542-023-00143-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bergmanmindye thedobbsdecisionandthefutureofoccupationalhealthintheus AT gaskinsvanessaa thedobbsdecisionandthefutureofoccupationalhealthintheus AT allentammy thedobbsdecisionandthefutureofoccupationalhealthintheus AT cheunghokwan thedobbsdecisionandthefutureofoccupationalhealthintheus AT heblmikki thedobbsdecisionandthefutureofoccupationalhealthintheus AT kingedenb thedobbsdecisionandthefutureofoccupationalhealthintheus AT sinclairrobertr thedobbsdecisionandthefutureofoccupationalhealthintheus AT siutarosel thedobbsdecisionandthefutureofoccupationalhealthintheus AT wolfecorrine thedobbsdecisionandthefutureofoccupationalhealthintheus AT zelinalexandrai thedobbsdecisionandthefutureofoccupationalhealthintheus AT bergmanmindye dobbsdecisionandthefutureofoccupationalhealthintheus AT gaskinsvanessaa dobbsdecisionandthefutureofoccupationalhealthintheus AT allentammy dobbsdecisionandthefutureofoccupationalhealthintheus AT cheunghokwan dobbsdecisionandthefutureofoccupationalhealthintheus AT heblmikki dobbsdecisionandthefutureofoccupationalhealthintheus AT kingedenb dobbsdecisionandthefutureofoccupationalhealthintheus AT sinclairrobertr dobbsdecisionandthefutureofoccupationalhealthintheus AT siutarosel dobbsdecisionandthefutureofoccupationalhealthintheus AT wolfecorrine dobbsdecisionandthefutureofoccupationalhealthintheus AT zelinalexandrai dobbsdecisionandthefutureofoccupationalhealthintheus |