Cargando…
Pain management for people with dementia: a cross-setting systematic review and meta-ethnography
BACKGROUND: Pain management for people with dementia is challenging. There is limited understanding on the experiences of pain management from people with dementia, but also from those who support them. This study synthesised the qualitative evidence to explore the perspectives of people with dement...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9940246/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36815066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20494637221119588 |
_version_ | 1784891040670416896 |
---|---|
author | Smith, Toby O Lockey, Dawn Johnson, Helen Rice, Lauren Heard, Jay Irving, Lisa |
author_facet | Smith, Toby O Lockey, Dawn Johnson, Helen Rice, Lauren Heard, Jay Irving, Lisa |
author_sort | Smith, Toby O |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Pain management for people with dementia is challenging. There is limited understanding on the experiences of pain management from people with dementia, but also from those who support them. This study synthesised the qualitative evidence to explore the perspectives of people with dementia, their family, friends, carers and healthcare professionals to pain management. METHODS: A systematic literature review was undertaken of published and unpublished literature databases (to 01 November 2021). All qualitative research studies reporting the perspectives of people with dementia, their family, friends, carers and healthcare professionals to managing pain were included. Eligible studies were appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) qualitative appraisal tool. A meta-ethnography analysis approach was adopted, with findings assessed against the GRADE-CERQual framework. RESULTS: Of the 3994 citations screened, 33 studies were eligible. Seven themes were identified from the data. There was moderate evidence from six studies indicating inequity of pain management for people with dementia. There was moderate evidence from 22 studies regarding anxieties on cascading pain information. There was moderate evidence from nine studies that familiarisation of the person with pain, their preferences, routines and behaviours were key factors to better pain management. Consistently, carers and healthcare professionals had a low opinion of the management of pain for people with dementia, with tensions over the ‘best’ treatment options to offer. This was associated with poor training and understanding on how pain ‘should’ be managed. CONCLUSION: The findings highlight the challenges faced by people with dementia and pain, and those who support them. Improvements in education for people who support these individuals would be valuable across health and social care pathways. Supporting family members and relatives on pain experiences and treatment options could improve awareness to improve quality of life for people with dementia and pain and those who support them. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9940246 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99402462023-02-21 Pain management for people with dementia: a cross-setting systematic review and meta-ethnography Smith, Toby O Lockey, Dawn Johnson, Helen Rice, Lauren Heard, Jay Irving, Lisa Br J Pain Articles BACKGROUND: Pain management for people with dementia is challenging. There is limited understanding on the experiences of pain management from people with dementia, but also from those who support them. This study synthesised the qualitative evidence to explore the perspectives of people with dementia, their family, friends, carers and healthcare professionals to pain management. METHODS: A systematic literature review was undertaken of published and unpublished literature databases (to 01 November 2021). All qualitative research studies reporting the perspectives of people with dementia, their family, friends, carers and healthcare professionals to managing pain were included. Eligible studies were appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) qualitative appraisal tool. A meta-ethnography analysis approach was adopted, with findings assessed against the GRADE-CERQual framework. RESULTS: Of the 3994 citations screened, 33 studies were eligible. Seven themes were identified from the data. There was moderate evidence from six studies indicating inequity of pain management for people with dementia. There was moderate evidence from 22 studies regarding anxieties on cascading pain information. There was moderate evidence from nine studies that familiarisation of the person with pain, their preferences, routines and behaviours were key factors to better pain management. Consistently, carers and healthcare professionals had a low opinion of the management of pain for people with dementia, with tensions over the ‘best’ treatment options to offer. This was associated with poor training and understanding on how pain ‘should’ be managed. CONCLUSION: The findings highlight the challenges faced by people with dementia and pain, and those who support them. Improvements in education for people who support these individuals would be valuable across health and social care pathways. Supporting family members and relatives on pain experiences and treatment options could improve awareness to improve quality of life for people with dementia and pain and those who support them. SAGE Publications 2022-09-16 2023-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9940246/ /pubmed/36815066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20494637221119588 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Articles Smith, Toby O Lockey, Dawn Johnson, Helen Rice, Lauren Heard, Jay Irving, Lisa Pain management for people with dementia: a cross-setting systematic review and meta-ethnography |
title | Pain management for people with dementia: a cross-setting systematic review and meta-ethnography |
title_full | Pain management for people with dementia: a cross-setting systematic review and meta-ethnography |
title_fullStr | Pain management for people with dementia: a cross-setting systematic review and meta-ethnography |
title_full_unstemmed | Pain management for people with dementia: a cross-setting systematic review and meta-ethnography |
title_short | Pain management for people with dementia: a cross-setting systematic review and meta-ethnography |
title_sort | pain management for people with dementia: a cross-setting systematic review and meta-ethnography |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9940246/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36815066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20494637221119588 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT smithtobyo painmanagementforpeoplewithdementiaacrosssettingsystematicreviewandmetaethnography AT lockeydawn painmanagementforpeoplewithdementiaacrosssettingsystematicreviewandmetaethnography AT johnsonhelen painmanagementforpeoplewithdementiaacrosssettingsystematicreviewandmetaethnography AT ricelauren painmanagementforpeoplewithdementiaacrosssettingsystematicreviewandmetaethnography AT heardjay painmanagementforpeoplewithdementiaacrosssettingsystematicreviewandmetaethnography AT irvinglisa painmanagementforpeoplewithdementiaacrosssettingsystematicreviewandmetaethnography |