Cargando…

Pain management for people with dementia: a cross-setting systematic review and meta-ethnography

BACKGROUND: Pain management for people with dementia is challenging. There is limited understanding on the experiences of pain management from people with dementia, but also from those who support them. This study synthesised the qualitative evidence to explore the perspectives of people with dement...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, Toby O, Lockey, Dawn, Johnson, Helen, Rice, Lauren, Heard, Jay, Irving, Lisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9940246/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36815066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20494637221119588
_version_ 1784891040670416896
author Smith, Toby O
Lockey, Dawn
Johnson, Helen
Rice, Lauren
Heard, Jay
Irving, Lisa
author_facet Smith, Toby O
Lockey, Dawn
Johnson, Helen
Rice, Lauren
Heard, Jay
Irving, Lisa
author_sort Smith, Toby O
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pain management for people with dementia is challenging. There is limited understanding on the experiences of pain management from people with dementia, but also from those who support them. This study synthesised the qualitative evidence to explore the perspectives of people with dementia, their family, friends, carers and healthcare professionals to pain management. METHODS: A systematic literature review was undertaken of published and unpublished literature databases (to 01 November 2021). All qualitative research studies reporting the perspectives of people with dementia, their family, friends, carers and healthcare professionals to managing pain were included. Eligible studies were appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) qualitative appraisal tool. A meta-ethnography analysis approach was adopted, with findings assessed against the GRADE-CERQual framework. RESULTS: Of the 3994 citations screened, 33 studies were eligible. Seven themes were identified from the data. There was moderate evidence from six studies indicating inequity of pain management for people with dementia. There was moderate evidence from 22 studies regarding anxieties on cascading pain information. There was moderate evidence from nine studies that familiarisation of the person with pain, their preferences, routines and behaviours were key factors to better pain management. Consistently, carers and healthcare professionals had a low opinion of the management of pain for people with dementia, with tensions over the ‘best’ treatment options to offer. This was associated with poor training and understanding on how pain ‘should’ be managed. CONCLUSION: The findings highlight the challenges faced by people with dementia and pain, and those who support them. Improvements in education for people who support these individuals would be valuable across health and social care pathways. Supporting family members and relatives on pain experiences and treatment options could improve awareness to improve quality of life for people with dementia and pain and those who support them.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9940246
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99402462023-02-21 Pain management for people with dementia: a cross-setting systematic review and meta-ethnography Smith, Toby O Lockey, Dawn Johnson, Helen Rice, Lauren Heard, Jay Irving, Lisa Br J Pain Articles BACKGROUND: Pain management for people with dementia is challenging. There is limited understanding on the experiences of pain management from people with dementia, but also from those who support them. This study synthesised the qualitative evidence to explore the perspectives of people with dementia, their family, friends, carers and healthcare professionals to pain management. METHODS: A systematic literature review was undertaken of published and unpublished literature databases (to 01 November 2021). All qualitative research studies reporting the perspectives of people with dementia, their family, friends, carers and healthcare professionals to managing pain were included. Eligible studies were appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) qualitative appraisal tool. A meta-ethnography analysis approach was adopted, with findings assessed against the GRADE-CERQual framework. RESULTS: Of the 3994 citations screened, 33 studies were eligible. Seven themes were identified from the data. There was moderate evidence from six studies indicating inequity of pain management for people with dementia. There was moderate evidence from 22 studies regarding anxieties on cascading pain information. There was moderate evidence from nine studies that familiarisation of the person with pain, their preferences, routines and behaviours were key factors to better pain management. Consistently, carers and healthcare professionals had a low opinion of the management of pain for people with dementia, with tensions over the ‘best’ treatment options to offer. This was associated with poor training and understanding on how pain ‘should’ be managed. CONCLUSION: The findings highlight the challenges faced by people with dementia and pain, and those who support them. Improvements in education for people who support these individuals would be valuable across health and social care pathways. Supporting family members and relatives on pain experiences and treatment options could improve awareness to improve quality of life for people with dementia and pain and those who support them. SAGE Publications 2022-09-16 2023-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9940246/ /pubmed/36815066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20494637221119588 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Articles
Smith, Toby O
Lockey, Dawn
Johnson, Helen
Rice, Lauren
Heard, Jay
Irving, Lisa
Pain management for people with dementia: a cross-setting systematic review and meta-ethnography
title Pain management for people with dementia: a cross-setting systematic review and meta-ethnography
title_full Pain management for people with dementia: a cross-setting systematic review and meta-ethnography
title_fullStr Pain management for people with dementia: a cross-setting systematic review and meta-ethnography
title_full_unstemmed Pain management for people with dementia: a cross-setting systematic review and meta-ethnography
title_short Pain management for people with dementia: a cross-setting systematic review and meta-ethnography
title_sort pain management for people with dementia: a cross-setting systematic review and meta-ethnography
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9940246/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36815066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20494637221119588
work_keys_str_mv AT smithtobyo painmanagementforpeoplewithdementiaacrosssettingsystematicreviewandmetaethnography
AT lockeydawn painmanagementforpeoplewithdementiaacrosssettingsystematicreviewandmetaethnography
AT johnsonhelen painmanagementforpeoplewithdementiaacrosssettingsystematicreviewandmetaethnography
AT ricelauren painmanagementforpeoplewithdementiaacrosssettingsystematicreviewandmetaethnography
AT heardjay painmanagementforpeoplewithdementiaacrosssettingsystematicreviewandmetaethnography
AT irvinglisa painmanagementforpeoplewithdementiaacrosssettingsystematicreviewandmetaethnography