Cargando…
De novo upper tract urothelial carcinoma after renal transplantation: a single-center experience in China
BACKGROUND: Long-term prognosis and risk factors of de novo upper tract urothelial carcinoma after renal transplantation were rarely studied. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the clinical features, risk factors, and long-term prognosis of de novo upper tract urothelial carcinoma after...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9940364/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36803451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-023-01190-0 |
_version_ | 1784891061255012352 |
---|---|
author | Li, Shixin Zhang, Jian Tian, Ye Zhu, Yichen Guo, Yuwen Wang, Zhipeng Yang, Yang Ding, Guangpu Lin, Jun |
author_facet | Li, Shixin Zhang, Jian Tian, Ye Zhu, Yichen Guo, Yuwen Wang, Zhipeng Yang, Yang Ding, Guangpu Lin, Jun |
author_sort | Li, Shixin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Long-term prognosis and risk factors of de novo upper tract urothelial carcinoma after renal transplantation were rarely studied. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the clinical features, risk factors, and long-term prognosis of de novo upper tract urothelial carcinoma after renal transplantation, especially the impact of aristolochic acid on tumor, using a large sample. METHODS: 106 patients were enrolled in retrospective study. The endpoints included overall survival, cancer-specific survival, bladder or contralateral upper tract recurrence-free survival. Patients were grouped according to aristolochic acid exposure. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan–Meier curve. Log-rank test was used to compare the difference. Multivariable cox regression was conducted to evaluate the prognostic significance. RESULTS: Median time from transplantation to development of upper tract urothelial carcinoma was 91.5 months. Cancer-specific survival rate at 1, 5, 10 years was 89.2%, 73.2%, 61.6%. Tumor staging (≥ T2), lymph node status (N +) were independent risk factors for cancer-specific death. Contralateral upper tract recurrence-free survival rate at 1, 3, 5 years was 80.4%, 68.5%, 50.9%. Aristolochic acid exposure was independent risk factor for contralateral upper tract recurrence. The patients exposed to aristolochic acid had more multifocal tumors and higher incidence of contralateral upper tract recurrence. CONCLUSION: Both higher tumor staging and positive lymph node status were associated with a worse cancer-specific survival in patients with post-transplant de novo upper tract urothelial carcinoma, which highlighted the importance of early diagnosis. Aristolochic acid was associated with multifocality of tumors and higher incidence of contralateral upper tract recurrence. Thus, prophylactic contralateral resection was suggested for post-transplant upper tract urothelial carcinoma, especially for patients with aristolochic acid exposure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9940364 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99403642023-02-21 De novo upper tract urothelial carcinoma after renal transplantation: a single-center experience in China Li, Shixin Zhang, Jian Tian, Ye Zhu, Yichen Guo, Yuwen Wang, Zhipeng Yang, Yang Ding, Guangpu Lin, Jun BMC Urol Research BACKGROUND: Long-term prognosis and risk factors of de novo upper tract urothelial carcinoma after renal transplantation were rarely studied. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the clinical features, risk factors, and long-term prognosis of de novo upper tract urothelial carcinoma after renal transplantation, especially the impact of aristolochic acid on tumor, using a large sample. METHODS: 106 patients were enrolled in retrospective study. The endpoints included overall survival, cancer-specific survival, bladder or contralateral upper tract recurrence-free survival. Patients were grouped according to aristolochic acid exposure. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan–Meier curve. Log-rank test was used to compare the difference. Multivariable cox regression was conducted to evaluate the prognostic significance. RESULTS: Median time from transplantation to development of upper tract urothelial carcinoma was 91.5 months. Cancer-specific survival rate at 1, 5, 10 years was 89.2%, 73.2%, 61.6%. Tumor staging (≥ T2), lymph node status (N +) were independent risk factors for cancer-specific death. Contralateral upper tract recurrence-free survival rate at 1, 3, 5 years was 80.4%, 68.5%, 50.9%. Aristolochic acid exposure was independent risk factor for contralateral upper tract recurrence. The patients exposed to aristolochic acid had more multifocal tumors and higher incidence of contralateral upper tract recurrence. CONCLUSION: Both higher tumor staging and positive lymph node status were associated with a worse cancer-specific survival in patients with post-transplant de novo upper tract urothelial carcinoma, which highlighted the importance of early diagnosis. Aristolochic acid was associated with multifocality of tumors and higher incidence of contralateral upper tract recurrence. Thus, prophylactic contralateral resection was suggested for post-transplant upper tract urothelial carcinoma, especially for patients with aristolochic acid exposure. BioMed Central 2023-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9940364/ /pubmed/36803451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-023-01190-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Li, Shixin Zhang, Jian Tian, Ye Zhu, Yichen Guo, Yuwen Wang, Zhipeng Yang, Yang Ding, Guangpu Lin, Jun De novo upper tract urothelial carcinoma after renal transplantation: a single-center experience in China |
title | De novo upper tract urothelial carcinoma after renal transplantation: a single-center experience in China |
title_full | De novo upper tract urothelial carcinoma after renal transplantation: a single-center experience in China |
title_fullStr | De novo upper tract urothelial carcinoma after renal transplantation: a single-center experience in China |
title_full_unstemmed | De novo upper tract urothelial carcinoma after renal transplantation: a single-center experience in China |
title_short | De novo upper tract urothelial carcinoma after renal transplantation: a single-center experience in China |
title_sort | de novo upper tract urothelial carcinoma after renal transplantation: a single-center experience in china |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9940364/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36803451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-023-01190-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lishixin denovouppertracturothelialcarcinomaafterrenaltransplantationasinglecenterexperienceinchina AT zhangjian denovouppertracturothelialcarcinomaafterrenaltransplantationasinglecenterexperienceinchina AT tianye denovouppertracturothelialcarcinomaafterrenaltransplantationasinglecenterexperienceinchina AT zhuyichen denovouppertracturothelialcarcinomaafterrenaltransplantationasinglecenterexperienceinchina AT guoyuwen denovouppertracturothelialcarcinomaafterrenaltransplantationasinglecenterexperienceinchina AT wangzhipeng denovouppertracturothelialcarcinomaafterrenaltransplantationasinglecenterexperienceinchina AT yangyang denovouppertracturothelialcarcinomaafterrenaltransplantationasinglecenterexperienceinchina AT dingguangpu denovouppertracturothelialcarcinomaafterrenaltransplantationasinglecenterexperienceinchina AT linjun denovouppertracturothelialcarcinomaafterrenaltransplantationasinglecenterexperienceinchina |