Cargando…

Safety and efficacy of Aurolab aqueous drainage implant in refractory glaucoma: A prospective study

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to assess the intraocular pressure (IOP) control and postoperative complications following a non-valved glaucoma drainage device (GDD) surgery in refractory glaucoma. METHODS: This was a prospective interventional study conducted on patients with glaucoma refractory...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jayasri, P, Kaliaperumal, Subashini, Behera, Geeta, Stephen, Mary
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9940568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36453316
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_1391_22
_version_ 1784891108727193600
author Jayasri, P
Kaliaperumal, Subashini
Behera, Geeta
Stephen, Mary
author_facet Jayasri, P
Kaliaperumal, Subashini
Behera, Geeta
Stephen, Mary
author_sort Jayasri, P
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study was conducted to assess the intraocular pressure (IOP) control and postoperative complications following a non-valved glaucoma drainage device (GDD) surgery in refractory glaucoma. METHODS: This was a prospective interventional study conducted on patients with glaucoma refractory to maximal medications or failed surgical treatment who underwent Aurolab aqueous drainage implant (AADI; Aurolabs, India) surgery. Primary outcome measures were IOP control, postoperative complications, and reduction in the number of antiglaucoma medications (AGM). RESULTS: Thirty-four eyes were analyzed and the mean follow-up was 16.06 ± 5.63 months. The preoperative median (Q1, Q3) IOP was 31 mmHg (28, 36.5) which decreased to 12 mmHg (12, 14) at 6 months postoperatively. The median (Q1, Q3) number of AGMs decreased from 3 (3, 4) to 0 (0, 1). Significant complications like implant extrusion and tube exposure were noted in two eyes. The total success and failure rates at 6 months were 91.1% and 8.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: AADI is effective in achieving target IOP and significantly reduces the use of AGMs with good safety in the short term. Long-term follow-up studies are needed to assess long-term IOP control and cost-effectiveness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9940568
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99405682023-02-21 Safety and efficacy of Aurolab aqueous drainage implant in refractory glaucoma: A prospective study Jayasri, P Kaliaperumal, Subashini Behera, Geeta Stephen, Mary Indian J Ophthalmol Original Article, Special Focus - Glaucoma PURPOSE: This study was conducted to assess the intraocular pressure (IOP) control and postoperative complications following a non-valved glaucoma drainage device (GDD) surgery in refractory glaucoma. METHODS: This was a prospective interventional study conducted on patients with glaucoma refractory to maximal medications or failed surgical treatment who underwent Aurolab aqueous drainage implant (AADI; Aurolabs, India) surgery. Primary outcome measures were IOP control, postoperative complications, and reduction in the number of antiglaucoma medications (AGM). RESULTS: Thirty-four eyes were analyzed and the mean follow-up was 16.06 ± 5.63 months. The preoperative median (Q1, Q3) IOP was 31 mmHg (28, 36.5) which decreased to 12 mmHg (12, 14) at 6 months postoperatively. The median (Q1, Q3) number of AGMs decreased from 3 (3, 4) to 0 (0, 1). Significant complications like implant extrusion and tube exposure were noted in two eyes. The total success and failure rates at 6 months were 91.1% and 8.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: AADI is effective in achieving target IOP and significantly reduces the use of AGMs with good safety in the short term. Long-term follow-up studies are needed to assess long-term IOP control and cost-effectiveness. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-12 2022-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9940568/ /pubmed/36453316 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_1391_22 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Indian Journal of Ophthalmology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article, Special Focus - Glaucoma
Jayasri, P
Kaliaperumal, Subashini
Behera, Geeta
Stephen, Mary
Safety and efficacy of Aurolab aqueous drainage implant in refractory glaucoma: A prospective study
title Safety and efficacy of Aurolab aqueous drainage implant in refractory glaucoma: A prospective study
title_full Safety and efficacy of Aurolab aqueous drainage implant in refractory glaucoma: A prospective study
title_fullStr Safety and efficacy of Aurolab aqueous drainage implant in refractory glaucoma: A prospective study
title_full_unstemmed Safety and efficacy of Aurolab aqueous drainage implant in refractory glaucoma: A prospective study
title_short Safety and efficacy of Aurolab aqueous drainage implant in refractory glaucoma: A prospective study
title_sort safety and efficacy of aurolab aqueous drainage implant in refractory glaucoma: a prospective study
topic Original Article, Special Focus - Glaucoma
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9940568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36453316
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_1391_22
work_keys_str_mv AT jayasrip safetyandefficacyofaurolabaqueousdrainageimplantinrefractoryglaucomaaprospectivestudy
AT kaliaperumalsubashini safetyandefficacyofaurolabaqueousdrainageimplantinrefractoryglaucomaaprospectivestudy
AT beherageeta safetyandefficacyofaurolabaqueousdrainageimplantinrefractoryglaucomaaprospectivestudy
AT stephenmary safetyandefficacyofaurolabaqueousdrainageimplantinrefractoryglaucomaaprospectivestudy