Cargando…

The use of complementary and traditional medicine for the treatment of patients with COVID-19: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the use and effectiveness of non-pharmacological therapies as part of the treatment of COVID-19 and its complications, either combined or not with the usual treatment. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted between August and October 2021 using Pu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Badanta, Barbara, García, Marta Alonso, Jiménez, Ángela Estepa, Lucchetti, Giancarlo, de Diego-Cordero, Rocío
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Published by Elsevier Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9941070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36828766
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.explore.2023.02.005
_version_ 1784891205387026432
author Badanta, Barbara
García, Marta Alonso
Jiménez, Ángela Estepa
Lucchetti, Giancarlo
de Diego-Cordero, Rocío
author_facet Badanta, Barbara
García, Marta Alonso
Jiménez, Ángela Estepa
Lucchetti, Giancarlo
de Diego-Cordero, Rocío
author_sort Badanta, Barbara
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the use and effectiveness of non-pharmacological therapies as part of the treatment of COVID-19 and its complications, either combined or not with the usual treatment. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted between August and October 2021 using PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL and Web of Science databases. From a total of 204 articles identified, 33 were included in the final sample (15 clinical trials and 18 quasi-experimental studies). The methodological evaluation was carried out using STROBE and CONSORT guidelines. RESULTS: There is a growing literature on the use of CAM for COVID-19. Most studies have shown positive findings, particularly for the use of TCM, other herbal therapies and acupuncture. Nevertheless, most studies were carried out in Asia and relied on quasi-experimental designs. The current evidence is available for physical outcomes (mortality rate, pneumonia resolution and other symptoms, negative PCR test, and hospitalization and ICU admissions) and for mental health outcomes. CONCLUSION: Despite a positive role of CAM on COVID-19 outcomes, the evidence is still mostly based on quasi-experimental studies. More robust clinical trials are needed in order to generate better evidence in this area.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9941070
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Published by Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99410702023-02-21 The use of complementary and traditional medicine for the treatment of patients with COVID-19: A systematic review Badanta, Barbara García, Marta Alonso Jiménez, Ángela Estepa Lucchetti, Giancarlo de Diego-Cordero, Rocío Explore (NY) Review Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the use and effectiveness of non-pharmacological therapies as part of the treatment of COVID-19 and its complications, either combined or not with the usual treatment. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted between August and October 2021 using PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL and Web of Science databases. From a total of 204 articles identified, 33 were included in the final sample (15 clinical trials and 18 quasi-experimental studies). The methodological evaluation was carried out using STROBE and CONSORT guidelines. RESULTS: There is a growing literature on the use of CAM for COVID-19. Most studies have shown positive findings, particularly for the use of TCM, other herbal therapies and acupuncture. Nevertheless, most studies were carried out in Asia and relied on quasi-experimental designs. The current evidence is available for physical outcomes (mortality rate, pneumonia resolution and other symptoms, negative PCR test, and hospitalization and ICU admissions) and for mental health outcomes. CONCLUSION: Despite a positive role of CAM on COVID-19 outcomes, the evidence is still mostly based on quasi-experimental studies. More robust clinical trials are needed in order to generate better evidence in this area. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2023-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9941070/ /pubmed/36828766 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.explore.2023.02.005 Text en © 2023 Published by Elsevier Inc. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Review Article
Badanta, Barbara
García, Marta Alonso
Jiménez, Ángela Estepa
Lucchetti, Giancarlo
de Diego-Cordero, Rocío
The use of complementary and traditional medicine for the treatment of patients with COVID-19: A systematic review
title The use of complementary and traditional medicine for the treatment of patients with COVID-19: A systematic review
title_full The use of complementary and traditional medicine for the treatment of patients with COVID-19: A systematic review
title_fullStr The use of complementary and traditional medicine for the treatment of patients with COVID-19: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed The use of complementary and traditional medicine for the treatment of patients with COVID-19: A systematic review
title_short The use of complementary and traditional medicine for the treatment of patients with COVID-19: A systematic review
title_sort use of complementary and traditional medicine for the treatment of patients with covid-19: a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9941070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36828766
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.explore.2023.02.005
work_keys_str_mv AT badantabarbara theuseofcomplementaryandtraditionalmedicineforthetreatmentofpatientswithcovid19asystematicreview
AT garciamartaalonso theuseofcomplementaryandtraditionalmedicineforthetreatmentofpatientswithcovid19asystematicreview
AT jimenezangelaestepa theuseofcomplementaryandtraditionalmedicineforthetreatmentofpatientswithcovid19asystematicreview
AT lucchettigiancarlo theuseofcomplementaryandtraditionalmedicineforthetreatmentofpatientswithcovid19asystematicreview
AT dediegocorderorocio theuseofcomplementaryandtraditionalmedicineforthetreatmentofpatientswithcovid19asystematicreview
AT badantabarbara useofcomplementaryandtraditionalmedicineforthetreatmentofpatientswithcovid19asystematicreview
AT garciamartaalonso useofcomplementaryandtraditionalmedicineforthetreatmentofpatientswithcovid19asystematicreview
AT jimenezangelaestepa useofcomplementaryandtraditionalmedicineforthetreatmentofpatientswithcovid19asystematicreview
AT lucchettigiancarlo useofcomplementaryandtraditionalmedicineforthetreatmentofpatientswithcovid19asystematicreview
AT dediegocorderorocio useofcomplementaryandtraditionalmedicineforthetreatmentofpatientswithcovid19asystematicreview