Cargando…
Assessing the artificially intelligent workplace: an ethical framework for evaluating experimental technologies in workplace settings
Experimental technologies, including AI and robots, are revolutionising many types of work. For example, the logistics warehouse sector is witnessing a wave of new technologies, such as automated picking tools, collaborative robots and exoskeletons, affecting jobs and employees. Notably, it is not a...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9942061/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36846834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43681-023-00265-w |
_version_ | 1784891411918749696 |
---|---|
author | Hosseini, Ziagul Nyholm, Sven Le Blanc, Pascale M. Preenen, Paul T. Y. Demerouti, Evangelia |
author_facet | Hosseini, Ziagul Nyholm, Sven Le Blanc, Pascale M. Preenen, Paul T. Y. Demerouti, Evangelia |
author_sort | Hosseini, Ziagul |
collection | PubMed |
description | Experimental technologies, including AI and robots, are revolutionising many types of work. For example, the logistics warehouse sector is witnessing a wave of new technologies, such as automated picking tools, collaborative robots and exoskeletons, affecting jobs and employees. Notably, it is not always possible to predict the effects of such new technologies, since they have inherent uncertainties and unintended consequences. Hence, their introduction into workplaces can be conceived as a social experiment. This paper aims to sketch a set of ethical guidelines for introducing experimental technologies into workplaces. It builds on Van de Poel's general framework for assessing new experimental technologies and translates that framework into a more specific context of work. We discuss its five principles: non-maleficence, beneficence, responsibility, autonomy, and justice. Each of these principles is applied to workplaces in general, and specifically to the logistics warehouse setting as a case study. A particular focus in our discussion is put on the distinctive potential harms and goods of work. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9942061 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99420612023-02-21 Assessing the artificially intelligent workplace: an ethical framework for evaluating experimental technologies in workplace settings Hosseini, Ziagul Nyholm, Sven Le Blanc, Pascale M. Preenen, Paul T. Y. Demerouti, Evangelia AI Ethics Original Research Experimental technologies, including AI and robots, are revolutionising many types of work. For example, the logistics warehouse sector is witnessing a wave of new technologies, such as automated picking tools, collaborative robots and exoskeletons, affecting jobs and employees. Notably, it is not always possible to predict the effects of such new technologies, since they have inherent uncertainties and unintended consequences. Hence, their introduction into workplaces can be conceived as a social experiment. This paper aims to sketch a set of ethical guidelines for introducing experimental technologies into workplaces. It builds on Van de Poel's general framework for assessing new experimental technologies and translates that framework into a more specific context of work. We discuss its five principles: non-maleficence, beneficence, responsibility, autonomy, and justice. Each of these principles is applied to workplaces in general, and specifically to the logistics warehouse setting as a case study. A particular focus in our discussion is put on the distinctive potential harms and goods of work. Springer International Publishing 2023-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9942061/ /pubmed/36846834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43681-023-00265-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Hosseini, Ziagul Nyholm, Sven Le Blanc, Pascale M. Preenen, Paul T. Y. Demerouti, Evangelia Assessing the artificially intelligent workplace: an ethical framework for evaluating experimental technologies in workplace settings |
title | Assessing the artificially intelligent workplace: an ethical framework for evaluating experimental technologies in workplace settings |
title_full | Assessing the artificially intelligent workplace: an ethical framework for evaluating experimental technologies in workplace settings |
title_fullStr | Assessing the artificially intelligent workplace: an ethical framework for evaluating experimental technologies in workplace settings |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing the artificially intelligent workplace: an ethical framework for evaluating experimental technologies in workplace settings |
title_short | Assessing the artificially intelligent workplace: an ethical framework for evaluating experimental technologies in workplace settings |
title_sort | assessing the artificially intelligent workplace: an ethical framework for evaluating experimental technologies in workplace settings |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9942061/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36846834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43681-023-00265-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hosseiniziagul assessingtheartificiallyintelligentworkplaceanethicalframeworkforevaluatingexperimentaltechnologiesinworkplacesettings AT nyholmsven assessingtheartificiallyintelligentworkplaceanethicalframeworkforevaluatingexperimentaltechnologiesinworkplacesettings AT leblancpascalem assessingtheartificiallyintelligentworkplaceanethicalframeworkforevaluatingexperimentaltechnologiesinworkplacesettings AT preenenpaulty assessingtheartificiallyintelligentworkplaceanethicalframeworkforevaluatingexperimentaltechnologiesinworkplacesettings AT demeroutievangelia assessingtheartificiallyintelligentworkplaceanethicalframeworkforevaluatingexperimentaltechnologiesinworkplacesettings |