Cargando…
Optimal surgical treatment for periprosthetic distal femoral fractures after total knee arthroplasty: a Bayesian-based network analysis
BACKGROUND: The surgical methods for periprosthetic distal femoral fractures (PDFFs) after total knee arthroplasty included locking compression plate (LCP), retrograde intramedullary nailing (RIMN), and distal femoral replacement (DFR). However, the optimal treatment remains controversial. We perfor...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9942323/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36803522 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03586-y |
_version_ | 1784891475321946112 |
---|---|
author | Fu, Peng Liang, Wenwei Gao, Zhenzhen Chen, Gang Fan, Weimin |
author_facet | Fu, Peng Liang, Wenwei Gao, Zhenzhen Chen, Gang Fan, Weimin |
author_sort | Fu, Peng |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The surgical methods for periprosthetic distal femoral fractures (PDFFs) after total knee arthroplasty included locking compression plate (LCP), retrograde intramedullary nailing (RIMN), and distal femoral replacement (DFR). However, the optimal treatment remains controversial. We performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) to provide the optimal surgical method for PDFFs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Electronic databases, including Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and PubMed, were searched for studies that compared LCP, RIMN, and DFR for PDFFs. The quality of the included studies was assessed according to the Newcastle–Ottawa scale. Pairwise meta-analysis was performed by Review Manager version 5.4. The NMA was conducted in Aggregate Data Drug Information System software version 1.16.5. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for postoperative complications and reoperations. RESULTS: A total of 19 studies and 1198 patients were included, of whom 733 for LCP, 282 for RIMN, and 183 for DFR. Pairwise meta-analysis comparing LCP to RIMN and LCP to DFR showed no significant difference in complications and reoperations except that RIMN had a higher risk of malunion comparing to LCP (OR 3.05; 95% CI 1.46–6.34; P = 0.003). No statistically significant effects were found in the NMA of overall complications, infection, and reoperation. However, results of rank probabilities showed that DFR ranked best in overall complications and reoperation, RIMN ranked best in infection but worst in reoperation, and LCP ranked worst in infection and middle in reoperation. DISCUSSION: We found similar complication rate and reoperation rate between LCP, RIMN, and DFR. The results of rank probabilities favored DFR, and further studies with high-level evidence are expected to verify the optimal surgical method for PDFFs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II; network meta-analysis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9942323 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99423232023-02-22 Optimal surgical treatment for periprosthetic distal femoral fractures after total knee arthroplasty: a Bayesian-based network analysis Fu, Peng Liang, Wenwei Gao, Zhenzhen Chen, Gang Fan, Weimin J Orthop Surg Res Correspondence BACKGROUND: The surgical methods for periprosthetic distal femoral fractures (PDFFs) after total knee arthroplasty included locking compression plate (LCP), retrograde intramedullary nailing (RIMN), and distal femoral replacement (DFR). However, the optimal treatment remains controversial. We performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) to provide the optimal surgical method for PDFFs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Electronic databases, including Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and PubMed, were searched for studies that compared LCP, RIMN, and DFR for PDFFs. The quality of the included studies was assessed according to the Newcastle–Ottawa scale. Pairwise meta-analysis was performed by Review Manager version 5.4. The NMA was conducted in Aggregate Data Drug Information System software version 1.16.5. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for postoperative complications and reoperations. RESULTS: A total of 19 studies and 1198 patients were included, of whom 733 for LCP, 282 for RIMN, and 183 for DFR. Pairwise meta-analysis comparing LCP to RIMN and LCP to DFR showed no significant difference in complications and reoperations except that RIMN had a higher risk of malunion comparing to LCP (OR 3.05; 95% CI 1.46–6.34; P = 0.003). No statistically significant effects were found in the NMA of overall complications, infection, and reoperation. However, results of rank probabilities showed that DFR ranked best in overall complications and reoperation, RIMN ranked best in infection but worst in reoperation, and LCP ranked worst in infection and middle in reoperation. DISCUSSION: We found similar complication rate and reoperation rate between LCP, RIMN, and DFR. The results of rank probabilities favored DFR, and further studies with high-level evidence are expected to verify the optimal surgical method for PDFFs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II; network meta-analysis. BioMed Central 2023-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9942323/ /pubmed/36803522 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03586-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Correspondence Fu, Peng Liang, Wenwei Gao, Zhenzhen Chen, Gang Fan, Weimin Optimal surgical treatment for periprosthetic distal femoral fractures after total knee arthroplasty: a Bayesian-based network analysis |
title | Optimal surgical treatment for periprosthetic distal femoral fractures after total knee arthroplasty: a Bayesian-based network analysis |
title_full | Optimal surgical treatment for periprosthetic distal femoral fractures after total knee arthroplasty: a Bayesian-based network analysis |
title_fullStr | Optimal surgical treatment for periprosthetic distal femoral fractures after total knee arthroplasty: a Bayesian-based network analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimal surgical treatment for periprosthetic distal femoral fractures after total knee arthroplasty: a Bayesian-based network analysis |
title_short | Optimal surgical treatment for periprosthetic distal femoral fractures after total knee arthroplasty: a Bayesian-based network analysis |
title_sort | optimal surgical treatment for periprosthetic distal femoral fractures after total knee arthroplasty: a bayesian-based network analysis |
topic | Correspondence |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9942323/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36803522 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03586-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fupeng optimalsurgicaltreatmentforperiprostheticdistalfemoralfracturesaftertotalkneearthroplastyabayesianbasednetworkanalysis AT liangwenwei optimalsurgicaltreatmentforperiprostheticdistalfemoralfracturesaftertotalkneearthroplastyabayesianbasednetworkanalysis AT gaozhenzhen optimalsurgicaltreatmentforperiprostheticdistalfemoralfracturesaftertotalkneearthroplastyabayesianbasednetworkanalysis AT chengang optimalsurgicaltreatmentforperiprostheticdistalfemoralfracturesaftertotalkneearthroplastyabayesianbasednetworkanalysis AT fanweimin optimalsurgicaltreatmentforperiprostheticdistalfemoralfracturesaftertotalkneearthroplastyabayesianbasednetworkanalysis |