Cargando…
Efficacy and safety of proton beam therapy for rhabdomyosarcoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate and conduct a meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of proton beam therapy (PBT) for rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS). METHODS: We searched for articles using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases from their inception to December 22, 2022. Tw...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9942395/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36805784 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-023-02223-6 |
_version_ | 1784891490796830720 |
---|---|
author | Dong, Meng Wu, Jianrong Wu, Renhua Wang, Dandan Liu, Ruifeng Luo, Hongtao Wang, Yuhang Chen, Junru Ou, Yuhong Zhang, Qiuning Wang, Xiaohu |
author_facet | Dong, Meng Wu, Jianrong Wu, Renhua Wang, Dandan Liu, Ruifeng Luo, Hongtao Wang, Yuhang Chen, Junru Ou, Yuhong Zhang, Qiuning Wang, Xiaohu |
author_sort | Dong, Meng |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate and conduct a meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of proton beam therapy (PBT) for rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS). METHODS: We searched for articles using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases from their inception to December 22, 2022. Two researchers independently screened literature and extracted data. Statistical analyses were performed using STATA version 14.0. RESULTS: We got 675 candidate articles, of which 11 studies were included in our study according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of the 544 RMS patients who received PBT. The local control (LC) rate at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years were 96% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.91–1.01), 93% (95% CI 0.86–1.00), 78% (95% CI 0.71–0.85), 85% (95% CI 0.78–0.92), and 84% (95% CI 0.74–0.95), respectively. The progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years were 82% (95% CI 0.72–0.92), 73% (95% CI 0.61–0.84), 63% (95% CI 0.47–0.79), 64% (95% CI 0.54–0.74), and 76% (95% CI 0.59–0.94), respectively. The overall survival (OS) rate at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years were 93% (95% CI 0.86–1.00), 85% (95% CI 0.76–0.95), 80% (95% CI 0.63–0.96), 71% (95% CI 0.62–0.80), and 82% (95% CI 0.71–0.94), respectively. Acute and late toxicities were mainly grades 1 to 2 in all studies. CONCLUSION: As an advantageous RT technique, PBT is an emerging option for patients with RMS, particularly children and adolescents patients. The data showed that PBT is a feasible, safe, and effective modality for RMS, showing promising LC, OS, PFS, and lower acute and late toxicities. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022329154. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9942395 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99423952023-02-22 Efficacy and safety of proton beam therapy for rhabdomyosarcoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis Dong, Meng Wu, Jianrong Wu, Renhua Wang, Dandan Liu, Ruifeng Luo, Hongtao Wang, Yuhang Chen, Junru Ou, Yuhong Zhang, Qiuning Wang, Xiaohu Radiat Oncol Review OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate and conduct a meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of proton beam therapy (PBT) for rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS). METHODS: We searched for articles using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases from their inception to December 22, 2022. Two researchers independently screened literature and extracted data. Statistical analyses were performed using STATA version 14.0. RESULTS: We got 675 candidate articles, of which 11 studies were included in our study according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of the 544 RMS patients who received PBT. The local control (LC) rate at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years were 96% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.91–1.01), 93% (95% CI 0.86–1.00), 78% (95% CI 0.71–0.85), 85% (95% CI 0.78–0.92), and 84% (95% CI 0.74–0.95), respectively. The progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years were 82% (95% CI 0.72–0.92), 73% (95% CI 0.61–0.84), 63% (95% CI 0.47–0.79), 64% (95% CI 0.54–0.74), and 76% (95% CI 0.59–0.94), respectively. The overall survival (OS) rate at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years were 93% (95% CI 0.86–1.00), 85% (95% CI 0.76–0.95), 80% (95% CI 0.63–0.96), 71% (95% CI 0.62–0.80), and 82% (95% CI 0.71–0.94), respectively. Acute and late toxicities were mainly grades 1 to 2 in all studies. CONCLUSION: As an advantageous RT technique, PBT is an emerging option for patients with RMS, particularly children and adolescents patients. The data showed that PBT is a feasible, safe, and effective modality for RMS, showing promising LC, OS, PFS, and lower acute and late toxicities. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022329154. BioMed Central 2023-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9942395/ /pubmed/36805784 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-023-02223-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Dong, Meng Wu, Jianrong Wu, Renhua Wang, Dandan Liu, Ruifeng Luo, Hongtao Wang, Yuhang Chen, Junru Ou, Yuhong Zhang, Qiuning Wang, Xiaohu Efficacy and safety of proton beam therapy for rhabdomyosarcoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Efficacy and safety of proton beam therapy for rhabdomyosarcoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Efficacy and safety of proton beam therapy for rhabdomyosarcoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and safety of proton beam therapy for rhabdomyosarcoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and safety of proton beam therapy for rhabdomyosarcoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Efficacy and safety of proton beam therapy for rhabdomyosarcoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of proton beam therapy for rhabdomyosarcoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9942395/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36805784 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-023-02223-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dongmeng efficacyandsafetyofprotonbeamtherapyforrhabdomyosarcomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wujianrong efficacyandsafetyofprotonbeamtherapyforrhabdomyosarcomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wurenhua efficacyandsafetyofprotonbeamtherapyforrhabdomyosarcomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangdandan efficacyandsafetyofprotonbeamtherapyforrhabdomyosarcomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liuruifeng efficacyandsafetyofprotonbeamtherapyforrhabdomyosarcomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT luohongtao efficacyandsafetyofprotonbeamtherapyforrhabdomyosarcomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangyuhang efficacyandsafetyofprotonbeamtherapyforrhabdomyosarcomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chenjunru efficacyandsafetyofprotonbeamtherapyforrhabdomyosarcomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ouyuhong efficacyandsafetyofprotonbeamtherapyforrhabdomyosarcomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhangqiuning efficacyandsafetyofprotonbeamtherapyforrhabdomyosarcomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangxiaohu efficacyandsafetyofprotonbeamtherapyforrhabdomyosarcomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |