Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of proton beam therapy for rhabdomyosarcoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate and conduct a meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of proton beam therapy (PBT) for rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS). METHODS: We searched for articles using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases from their inception to December 22, 2022. Tw...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dong, Meng, Wu, Jianrong, Wu, Renhua, Wang, Dandan, Liu, Ruifeng, Luo, Hongtao, Wang, Yuhang, Chen, Junru, Ou, Yuhong, Zhang, Qiuning, Wang, Xiaohu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9942395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36805784
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-023-02223-6
_version_ 1784891490796830720
author Dong, Meng
Wu, Jianrong
Wu, Renhua
Wang, Dandan
Liu, Ruifeng
Luo, Hongtao
Wang, Yuhang
Chen, Junru
Ou, Yuhong
Zhang, Qiuning
Wang, Xiaohu
author_facet Dong, Meng
Wu, Jianrong
Wu, Renhua
Wang, Dandan
Liu, Ruifeng
Luo, Hongtao
Wang, Yuhang
Chen, Junru
Ou, Yuhong
Zhang, Qiuning
Wang, Xiaohu
author_sort Dong, Meng
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate and conduct a meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of proton beam therapy (PBT) for rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS). METHODS: We searched for articles using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases from their inception to December 22, 2022. Two researchers independently screened literature and extracted data. Statistical analyses were performed using STATA version 14.0. RESULTS: We got 675 candidate articles, of which 11 studies were included in our study according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of the 544 RMS patients who received PBT. The local control (LC) rate at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years were 96% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.91–1.01), 93% (95% CI 0.86–1.00), 78% (95% CI 0.71–0.85), 85% (95% CI 0.78–0.92), and 84% (95% CI 0.74–0.95), respectively. The progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years were 82% (95% CI 0.72–0.92), 73% (95% CI 0.61–0.84), 63% (95% CI 0.47–0.79), 64% (95% CI 0.54–0.74), and 76% (95% CI 0.59–0.94), respectively. The overall survival (OS) rate at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years were 93% (95% CI 0.86–1.00), 85% (95% CI 0.76–0.95), 80% (95% CI 0.63–0.96), 71% (95% CI 0.62–0.80), and 82% (95% CI 0.71–0.94), respectively. Acute and late toxicities were mainly grades 1 to 2 in all studies. CONCLUSION: As an advantageous RT technique, PBT is an emerging option for patients with RMS, particularly children and adolescents patients. The data showed that PBT is a feasible, safe, and effective modality for RMS, showing promising LC, OS, PFS, and lower acute and late toxicities. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022329154.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9942395
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99423952023-02-22 Efficacy and safety of proton beam therapy for rhabdomyosarcoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis Dong, Meng Wu, Jianrong Wu, Renhua Wang, Dandan Liu, Ruifeng Luo, Hongtao Wang, Yuhang Chen, Junru Ou, Yuhong Zhang, Qiuning Wang, Xiaohu Radiat Oncol Review OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate and conduct a meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of proton beam therapy (PBT) for rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS). METHODS: We searched for articles using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases from their inception to December 22, 2022. Two researchers independently screened literature and extracted data. Statistical analyses were performed using STATA version 14.0. RESULTS: We got 675 candidate articles, of which 11 studies were included in our study according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of the 544 RMS patients who received PBT. The local control (LC) rate at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years were 96% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.91–1.01), 93% (95% CI 0.86–1.00), 78% (95% CI 0.71–0.85), 85% (95% CI 0.78–0.92), and 84% (95% CI 0.74–0.95), respectively. The progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years were 82% (95% CI 0.72–0.92), 73% (95% CI 0.61–0.84), 63% (95% CI 0.47–0.79), 64% (95% CI 0.54–0.74), and 76% (95% CI 0.59–0.94), respectively. The overall survival (OS) rate at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years were 93% (95% CI 0.86–1.00), 85% (95% CI 0.76–0.95), 80% (95% CI 0.63–0.96), 71% (95% CI 0.62–0.80), and 82% (95% CI 0.71–0.94), respectively. Acute and late toxicities were mainly grades 1 to 2 in all studies. CONCLUSION: As an advantageous RT technique, PBT is an emerging option for patients with RMS, particularly children and adolescents patients. The data showed that PBT is a feasible, safe, and effective modality for RMS, showing promising LC, OS, PFS, and lower acute and late toxicities. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022329154. BioMed Central 2023-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9942395/ /pubmed/36805784 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-023-02223-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Dong, Meng
Wu, Jianrong
Wu, Renhua
Wang, Dandan
Liu, Ruifeng
Luo, Hongtao
Wang, Yuhang
Chen, Junru
Ou, Yuhong
Zhang, Qiuning
Wang, Xiaohu
Efficacy and safety of proton beam therapy for rhabdomyosarcoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Efficacy and safety of proton beam therapy for rhabdomyosarcoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Efficacy and safety of proton beam therapy for rhabdomyosarcoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of proton beam therapy for rhabdomyosarcoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of proton beam therapy for rhabdomyosarcoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Efficacy and safety of proton beam therapy for rhabdomyosarcoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of proton beam therapy for rhabdomyosarcoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9942395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36805784
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-023-02223-6
work_keys_str_mv AT dongmeng efficacyandsafetyofprotonbeamtherapyforrhabdomyosarcomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wujianrong efficacyandsafetyofprotonbeamtherapyforrhabdomyosarcomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wurenhua efficacyandsafetyofprotonbeamtherapyforrhabdomyosarcomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangdandan efficacyandsafetyofprotonbeamtherapyforrhabdomyosarcomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liuruifeng efficacyandsafetyofprotonbeamtherapyforrhabdomyosarcomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT luohongtao efficacyandsafetyofprotonbeamtherapyforrhabdomyosarcomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangyuhang efficacyandsafetyofprotonbeamtherapyforrhabdomyosarcomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chenjunru efficacyandsafetyofprotonbeamtherapyforrhabdomyosarcomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ouyuhong efficacyandsafetyofprotonbeamtherapyforrhabdomyosarcomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangqiuning efficacyandsafetyofprotonbeamtherapyforrhabdomyosarcomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangxiaohu efficacyandsafetyofprotonbeamtherapyforrhabdomyosarcomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis