Cargando…

Comparison of treatment outcomes of 360° intraoperative laser retinopexy and focal laser retinopexy with pars plans vitrectomy in patients with primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment

BACKGROUND: This study was to compare the outcomes of 360° intra-operative laser retinopexy (ILR) and focal laser retinopexy in treating patients with pars plans vitrectomy (PPV) for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). To identify other potential risk factors for retinal re-detachment a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zheng, Ying, Schindler, Philip, Druchkiv, Vasyl, Schulz, Jan, Spitzer, Stephan Martin, Skevas, Christos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9942399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36809995
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-02812-9
_version_ 1784891491830726656
author Zheng, Ying
Schindler, Philip
Druchkiv, Vasyl
Schulz, Jan
Spitzer, Stephan Martin
Skevas, Christos
author_facet Zheng, Ying
Schindler, Philip
Druchkiv, Vasyl
Schulz, Jan
Spitzer, Stephan Martin
Skevas, Christos
author_sort Zheng, Ying
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study was to compare the outcomes of 360° intra-operative laser retinopexy (ILR) and focal laser retinopexy in treating patients with pars plans vitrectomy (PPV) for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). To identify other potential risk factors for retinal re-detachment after primary PPV. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study. Three hundred and forty-four consecutive cases of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment treated with PPV were included between July 2013 and July 2018. Clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes were compared between focal laser retinopexy and additional 360° intra-operative laser retinopexy groups. Both univariate and multiple variable analysis were used to identify potential risk factors for retinal re-detachment. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 6.2 months (Q1, Q3:2.0, 17.2). As estimated with survival analysis, the 360º ILR group had the incidence of 9.74% and focal laser 19.54% at 6 months postoperatively. At 12 months postoperatively the difference was 10.78% vs. 25.21%. The difference in survival rates was significant (p = 0.0021). In multivariate Cox regression, the risk factors for retinal re-detachment were without additional 360° ILR, diabetes and macula off before the primary surgery (relatively OR = 0.456, 95%-CI [0.245–0.848], p < 0.05; OR = 2.301, 95% CI [1.130–4.687], p < 0.05; OR = 2.243, 95% CI [1.212–4.149], p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Additional 360° ILR group had a significantly lower rate of retinal re-detachment when compared with focal laser retinopexy group. Our study also elucidated that diabetes and macular off before the primary surgery might also be the potential risk factors for higher rate of retinal re-detachment outcome. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This was a retrospective cohort study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9942399
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99423992023-02-22 Comparison of treatment outcomes of 360° intraoperative laser retinopexy and focal laser retinopexy with pars plans vitrectomy in patients with primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment Zheng, Ying Schindler, Philip Druchkiv, Vasyl Schulz, Jan Spitzer, Stephan Martin Skevas, Christos BMC Ophthalmol Research BACKGROUND: This study was to compare the outcomes of 360° intra-operative laser retinopexy (ILR) and focal laser retinopexy in treating patients with pars plans vitrectomy (PPV) for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). To identify other potential risk factors for retinal re-detachment after primary PPV. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study. Three hundred and forty-four consecutive cases of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment treated with PPV were included between July 2013 and July 2018. Clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes were compared between focal laser retinopexy and additional 360° intra-operative laser retinopexy groups. Both univariate and multiple variable analysis were used to identify potential risk factors for retinal re-detachment. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 6.2 months (Q1, Q3:2.0, 17.2). As estimated with survival analysis, the 360º ILR group had the incidence of 9.74% and focal laser 19.54% at 6 months postoperatively. At 12 months postoperatively the difference was 10.78% vs. 25.21%. The difference in survival rates was significant (p = 0.0021). In multivariate Cox regression, the risk factors for retinal re-detachment were without additional 360° ILR, diabetes and macula off before the primary surgery (relatively OR = 0.456, 95%-CI [0.245–0.848], p < 0.05; OR = 2.301, 95% CI [1.130–4.687], p < 0.05; OR = 2.243, 95% CI [1.212–4.149], p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Additional 360° ILR group had a significantly lower rate of retinal re-detachment when compared with focal laser retinopexy group. Our study also elucidated that diabetes and macular off before the primary surgery might also be the potential risk factors for higher rate of retinal re-detachment outcome. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This was a retrospective cohort study. BioMed Central 2023-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9942399/ /pubmed/36809995 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-02812-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Zheng, Ying
Schindler, Philip
Druchkiv, Vasyl
Schulz, Jan
Spitzer, Stephan Martin
Skevas, Christos
Comparison of treatment outcomes of 360° intraoperative laser retinopexy and focal laser retinopexy with pars plans vitrectomy in patients with primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment
title Comparison of treatment outcomes of 360° intraoperative laser retinopexy and focal laser retinopexy with pars plans vitrectomy in patients with primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment
title_full Comparison of treatment outcomes of 360° intraoperative laser retinopexy and focal laser retinopexy with pars plans vitrectomy in patients with primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment
title_fullStr Comparison of treatment outcomes of 360° intraoperative laser retinopexy and focal laser retinopexy with pars plans vitrectomy in patients with primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of treatment outcomes of 360° intraoperative laser retinopexy and focal laser retinopexy with pars plans vitrectomy in patients with primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment
title_short Comparison of treatment outcomes of 360° intraoperative laser retinopexy and focal laser retinopexy with pars plans vitrectomy in patients with primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment
title_sort comparison of treatment outcomes of 360° intraoperative laser retinopexy and focal laser retinopexy with pars plans vitrectomy in patients with primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9942399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36809995
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-02812-9
work_keys_str_mv AT zhengying comparisonoftreatmentoutcomesof360intraoperativelaserretinopexyandfocallaserretinopexywithparsplansvitrectomyinpatientswithprimaryrhegmatogenousretinaldetachment
AT schindlerphilip comparisonoftreatmentoutcomesof360intraoperativelaserretinopexyandfocallaserretinopexywithparsplansvitrectomyinpatientswithprimaryrhegmatogenousretinaldetachment
AT druchkivvasyl comparisonoftreatmentoutcomesof360intraoperativelaserretinopexyandfocallaserretinopexywithparsplansvitrectomyinpatientswithprimaryrhegmatogenousretinaldetachment
AT schulzjan comparisonoftreatmentoutcomesof360intraoperativelaserretinopexyandfocallaserretinopexywithparsplansvitrectomyinpatientswithprimaryrhegmatogenousretinaldetachment
AT spitzerstephanmartin comparisonoftreatmentoutcomesof360intraoperativelaserretinopexyandfocallaserretinopexywithparsplansvitrectomyinpatientswithprimaryrhegmatogenousretinaldetachment
AT skevaschristos comparisonoftreatmentoutcomesof360intraoperativelaserretinopexyandfocallaserretinopexywithparsplansvitrectomyinpatientswithprimaryrhegmatogenousretinaldetachment