Cargando…

Can Umbilical Cord and Meconium Results Be Directly Compared? Analytical Approach Matters

Maternal drug use during pregnancy is a significant concern. Drug-exposed newborns are often born premature and may suffer from birth defects, neonatal abstinence syndrome and cognitive and developmental delays. Because of this, testing of neonatal specimens is carried out to assess fetal drug expos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pandya, Vrajesh, Wilker, Chase, McMillin, Gwendolyn A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9942436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35707888
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkac037
_version_ 1784891500058902528
author Pandya, Vrajesh
Wilker, Chase
McMillin, Gwendolyn A
author_facet Pandya, Vrajesh
Wilker, Chase
McMillin, Gwendolyn A
author_sort Pandya, Vrajesh
collection PubMed
description Maternal drug use during pregnancy is a significant concern. Drug-exposed newborns are often born premature and may suffer from birth defects, neonatal abstinence syndrome and cognitive and developmental delays. Because of this, testing of neonatal specimens is carried out to assess fetal drug exposure during pregnancy. Umbilical cord tissue (UC) and meconium are commonly used specimens for this purpose. However, comprehensive studies comparing drug positivity rates and concentration in the two specimen types are lacking. To this end, 4,036 paired UC and meconium specimens originating from 13 states within the USA were identified, and retrospective analysis of drug positivity rates and drug concentration was performed for 31 analytes in 5 drug classes. Testing for 11-Nor-9-carboxy-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC-COOH) is a separate orderable for UC specimen at our laboratory, so a second data set was created for evaluation of this drug analyte with 2,112 paired UC and meconium specimens originating from 11 states. Testing of UC was performed by semi-quantitative liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS-MS) assays, whereas, for meconium, an immunoassay-based screening preceded LC–MS-MS confirmation tests. Results generated for UC and meconium specimens were therefore compared for a total of 32 drug analytes from 6 drug classes. Drug concentrations for analytes were higher in meconium compared to UC, with the exception of phencyclidine. Despite this, the positivity rates for individual analytes were higher in UC, with the exception of THC-COOH and cocaine. Furthermore, analysis for multidrug positivity revealed that THC-COOH and opioids were the most common multidrug combination detected in both matrices. In conclusion, this study suggests that for most drug compounds, UC was more analytically sensitive to assess neonatal drug exposure by current methodologies. Additionally, by demonstrating that meconium has higher drug concentrations for most compounds, this study sets the stage for developing more sensitive assays in meconium.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9942436
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99424362023-02-22 Can Umbilical Cord and Meconium Results Be Directly Compared? Analytical Approach Matters Pandya, Vrajesh Wilker, Chase McMillin, Gwendolyn A J Anal Toxicol Article Maternal drug use during pregnancy is a significant concern. Drug-exposed newborns are often born premature and may suffer from birth defects, neonatal abstinence syndrome and cognitive and developmental delays. Because of this, testing of neonatal specimens is carried out to assess fetal drug exposure during pregnancy. Umbilical cord tissue (UC) and meconium are commonly used specimens for this purpose. However, comprehensive studies comparing drug positivity rates and concentration in the two specimen types are lacking. To this end, 4,036 paired UC and meconium specimens originating from 13 states within the USA were identified, and retrospective analysis of drug positivity rates and drug concentration was performed for 31 analytes in 5 drug classes. Testing for 11-Nor-9-carboxy-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC-COOH) is a separate orderable for UC specimen at our laboratory, so a second data set was created for evaluation of this drug analyte with 2,112 paired UC and meconium specimens originating from 11 states. Testing of UC was performed by semi-quantitative liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS-MS) assays, whereas, for meconium, an immunoassay-based screening preceded LC–MS-MS confirmation tests. Results generated for UC and meconium specimens were therefore compared for a total of 32 drug analytes from 6 drug classes. Drug concentrations for analytes were higher in meconium compared to UC, with the exception of phencyclidine. Despite this, the positivity rates for individual analytes were higher in UC, with the exception of THC-COOH and cocaine. Furthermore, analysis for multidrug positivity revealed that THC-COOH and opioids were the most common multidrug combination detected in both matrices. In conclusion, this study suggests that for most drug compounds, UC was more analytically sensitive to assess neonatal drug exposure by current methodologies. Additionally, by demonstrating that meconium has higher drug concentrations for most compounds, this study sets the stage for developing more sensitive assays in meconium. Oxford University Press 2022-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9942436/ /pubmed/35707888 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkac037 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Article
Pandya, Vrajesh
Wilker, Chase
McMillin, Gwendolyn A
Can Umbilical Cord and Meconium Results Be Directly Compared? Analytical Approach Matters
title Can Umbilical Cord and Meconium Results Be Directly Compared? Analytical Approach Matters
title_full Can Umbilical Cord and Meconium Results Be Directly Compared? Analytical Approach Matters
title_fullStr Can Umbilical Cord and Meconium Results Be Directly Compared? Analytical Approach Matters
title_full_unstemmed Can Umbilical Cord and Meconium Results Be Directly Compared? Analytical Approach Matters
title_short Can Umbilical Cord and Meconium Results Be Directly Compared? Analytical Approach Matters
title_sort can umbilical cord and meconium results be directly compared? analytical approach matters
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9942436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35707888
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkac037
work_keys_str_mv AT pandyavrajesh canumbilicalcordandmeconiumresultsbedirectlycomparedanalyticalapproachmatters
AT wilkerchase canumbilicalcordandmeconiumresultsbedirectlycomparedanalyticalapproachmatters
AT mcmillingwendolyna canumbilicalcordandmeconiumresultsbedirectlycomparedanalyticalapproachmatters