Cargando…
Validation of the Swedish Trauma Registry (SweTrau)
PURPOSE: Validation of registries is important to ensure accuracy of data and registry-based research. This is often done by comparisons of the original registry data with other sources, e.g. another registry or a re-registration of data. Founded in 2011, the Swedish Trauma Registry (SweTrau) consis...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9942627/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36808554 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-023-02244-6 |
_version_ | 1784891540371406848 |
---|---|
author | Holmberg, Lina Frick Bergström, Monica Mani, Kevin Wanhainen, Anders Andréasson, Håkan Linder, Fredrik |
author_facet | Holmberg, Lina Frick Bergström, Monica Mani, Kevin Wanhainen, Anders Andréasson, Håkan Linder, Fredrik |
author_sort | Holmberg, Lina |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Validation of registries is important to ensure accuracy of data and registry-based research. This is often done by comparisons of the original registry data with other sources, e.g. another registry or a re-registration of data. Founded in 2011, the Swedish Trauma Registry (SweTrau) consists of variables based on international consensus (the Utstein Template of Trauma). This project aimed to perform the first validation of SweTrau. METHODS: On-site re-registration was performed on randomly selected trauma patients and compared to the registration in SweTrau. Accuracy (exact agreement), correctness (exact agreement plus data within acceptable range), comparability (similarity with other registries), data completeness (1-missing data) and case completeness (1-missing cases) were deemed as either good ([Formula: see text] 85%), adequate (70–84%) or poor (< 70%). Correlation was determined as either excellent ([Formula: see text] 0.8), strong (0.6–0.79), moderate (0.4–0.59) or weak (< 0.4). RESULTS: The data in SweTrau had good accuracy (85.8%), correctness (89.7%) and data completeness (88.5%), as well as strong or excellent correlation (87.5%). Case completeness was 44.3%, however, for NISS > 15 case completeness was 100%. Median time to registration was 4.5 months, with 84.2% registered one year after the trauma. The comparability showed an accordance with the Utstein Template of Trauma of almost 90%. CONCLUSIONS: The validity of SweTrau is good, with high accuracy, correctness, data completeness and correlation. The data are comparable to other trauma registries using the Utstein Template of Trauma; however, timeliness and case completeness are areas of improvement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9942627 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99426272023-02-22 Validation of the Swedish Trauma Registry (SweTrau) Holmberg, Lina Frick Bergström, Monica Mani, Kevin Wanhainen, Anders Andréasson, Håkan Linder, Fredrik Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Original Article PURPOSE: Validation of registries is important to ensure accuracy of data and registry-based research. This is often done by comparisons of the original registry data with other sources, e.g. another registry or a re-registration of data. Founded in 2011, the Swedish Trauma Registry (SweTrau) consists of variables based on international consensus (the Utstein Template of Trauma). This project aimed to perform the first validation of SweTrau. METHODS: On-site re-registration was performed on randomly selected trauma patients and compared to the registration in SweTrau. Accuracy (exact agreement), correctness (exact agreement plus data within acceptable range), comparability (similarity with other registries), data completeness (1-missing data) and case completeness (1-missing cases) were deemed as either good ([Formula: see text] 85%), adequate (70–84%) or poor (< 70%). Correlation was determined as either excellent ([Formula: see text] 0.8), strong (0.6–0.79), moderate (0.4–0.59) or weak (< 0.4). RESULTS: The data in SweTrau had good accuracy (85.8%), correctness (89.7%) and data completeness (88.5%), as well as strong or excellent correlation (87.5%). Case completeness was 44.3%, however, for NISS > 15 case completeness was 100%. Median time to registration was 4.5 months, with 84.2% registered one year after the trauma. The comparability showed an accordance with the Utstein Template of Trauma of almost 90%. CONCLUSIONS: The validity of SweTrau is good, with high accuracy, correctness, data completeness and correlation. The data are comparable to other trauma registries using the Utstein Template of Trauma; however, timeliness and case completeness are areas of improvement. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-02-21 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9942627/ /pubmed/36808554 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-023-02244-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Holmberg, Lina Frick Bergström, Monica Mani, Kevin Wanhainen, Anders Andréasson, Håkan Linder, Fredrik Validation of the Swedish Trauma Registry (SweTrau) |
title | Validation of the Swedish Trauma Registry (SweTrau) |
title_full | Validation of the Swedish Trauma Registry (SweTrau) |
title_fullStr | Validation of the Swedish Trauma Registry (SweTrau) |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of the Swedish Trauma Registry (SweTrau) |
title_short | Validation of the Swedish Trauma Registry (SweTrau) |
title_sort | validation of the swedish trauma registry (swetrau) |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9942627/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36808554 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-023-02244-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT holmberglina validationoftheswedishtraumaregistryswetrau AT frickbergstrommonica validationoftheswedishtraumaregistryswetrau AT manikevin validationoftheswedishtraumaregistryswetrau AT wanhainenanders validationoftheswedishtraumaregistryswetrau AT andreassonhakan validationoftheswedishtraumaregistryswetrau AT linderfredrik validationoftheswedishtraumaregistryswetrau |