Cargando…

Validation of the Swedish Trauma Registry (SweTrau)

PURPOSE: Validation of registries is important to ensure accuracy of data and registry-based research. This is often done by comparisons of the original registry data with other sources, e.g. another registry or a re-registration of data. Founded in 2011, the Swedish Trauma Registry (SweTrau) consis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Holmberg, Lina, Frick Bergström, Monica, Mani, Kevin, Wanhainen, Anders, Andréasson, Håkan, Linder, Fredrik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9942627/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36808554
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-023-02244-6
_version_ 1784891540371406848
author Holmberg, Lina
Frick Bergström, Monica
Mani, Kevin
Wanhainen, Anders
Andréasson, Håkan
Linder, Fredrik
author_facet Holmberg, Lina
Frick Bergström, Monica
Mani, Kevin
Wanhainen, Anders
Andréasson, Håkan
Linder, Fredrik
author_sort Holmberg, Lina
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Validation of registries is important to ensure accuracy of data and registry-based research. This is often done by comparisons of the original registry data with other sources, e.g. another registry or a re-registration of data. Founded in 2011, the Swedish Trauma Registry (SweTrau) consists of variables based on international consensus (the Utstein Template of Trauma). This project aimed to perform the first validation of SweTrau. METHODS: On-site re-registration was performed on randomly selected trauma patients and compared to the registration in SweTrau. Accuracy (exact agreement), correctness (exact agreement plus data within acceptable range), comparability (similarity with other registries), data completeness (1-missing data) and case completeness (1-missing cases) were deemed as either good ([Formula: see text] 85%), adequate (70–84%) or poor (< 70%). Correlation was determined as either excellent ([Formula: see text] 0.8), strong (0.6–0.79), moderate (0.4–0.59) or weak (< 0.4). RESULTS: The data in SweTrau had good accuracy (85.8%), correctness (89.7%) and data completeness (88.5%), as well as strong or excellent correlation (87.5%). Case completeness was 44.3%, however, for NISS > 15 case completeness was 100%. Median time to registration was 4.5 months, with 84.2% registered one year after the trauma. The comparability showed an accordance with the Utstein Template of Trauma of almost 90%. CONCLUSIONS: The validity of SweTrau is good, with high accuracy, correctness, data completeness and correlation. The data are comparable to other trauma registries using the Utstein Template of Trauma; however, timeliness and case completeness are areas of improvement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9942627
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99426272023-02-22 Validation of the Swedish Trauma Registry (SweTrau) Holmberg, Lina Frick Bergström, Monica Mani, Kevin Wanhainen, Anders Andréasson, Håkan Linder, Fredrik Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Original Article PURPOSE: Validation of registries is important to ensure accuracy of data and registry-based research. This is often done by comparisons of the original registry data with other sources, e.g. another registry or a re-registration of data. Founded in 2011, the Swedish Trauma Registry (SweTrau) consists of variables based on international consensus (the Utstein Template of Trauma). This project aimed to perform the first validation of SweTrau. METHODS: On-site re-registration was performed on randomly selected trauma patients and compared to the registration in SweTrau. Accuracy (exact agreement), correctness (exact agreement plus data within acceptable range), comparability (similarity with other registries), data completeness (1-missing data) and case completeness (1-missing cases) were deemed as either good ([Formula: see text] 85%), adequate (70–84%) or poor (< 70%). Correlation was determined as either excellent ([Formula: see text] 0.8), strong (0.6–0.79), moderate (0.4–0.59) or weak (< 0.4). RESULTS: The data in SweTrau had good accuracy (85.8%), correctness (89.7%) and data completeness (88.5%), as well as strong or excellent correlation (87.5%). Case completeness was 44.3%, however, for NISS > 15 case completeness was 100%. Median time to registration was 4.5 months, with 84.2% registered one year after the trauma. The comparability showed an accordance with the Utstein Template of Trauma of almost 90%. CONCLUSIONS: The validity of SweTrau is good, with high accuracy, correctness, data completeness and correlation. The data are comparable to other trauma registries using the Utstein Template of Trauma; however, timeliness and case completeness are areas of improvement. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-02-21 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9942627/ /pubmed/36808554 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-023-02244-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Holmberg, Lina
Frick Bergström, Monica
Mani, Kevin
Wanhainen, Anders
Andréasson, Håkan
Linder, Fredrik
Validation of the Swedish Trauma Registry (SweTrau)
title Validation of the Swedish Trauma Registry (SweTrau)
title_full Validation of the Swedish Trauma Registry (SweTrau)
title_fullStr Validation of the Swedish Trauma Registry (SweTrau)
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the Swedish Trauma Registry (SweTrau)
title_short Validation of the Swedish Trauma Registry (SweTrau)
title_sort validation of the swedish trauma registry (swetrau)
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9942627/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36808554
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-023-02244-6
work_keys_str_mv AT holmberglina validationoftheswedishtraumaregistryswetrau
AT frickbergstrommonica validationoftheswedishtraumaregistryswetrau
AT manikevin validationoftheswedishtraumaregistryswetrau
AT wanhainenanders validationoftheswedishtraumaregistryswetrau
AT andreassonhakan validationoftheswedishtraumaregistryswetrau
AT linderfredrik validationoftheswedishtraumaregistryswetrau