Cargando…
Product Lifecycle Information Flow in E-waste Handling: a Means to Increase Circularity?
Electronic waste (e-waste) is a growing waste stream. In Europe, e-waste is regulated by the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) Directive. Each manufacturer or importer is responsible for the end-of-life (EoL) treatment of the equipment it handles, although this task is usually outsour...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9943738/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36844893 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43615-023-00258-1 |
_version_ | 1784891771193393152 |
---|---|
author | Andersen, Terje Halse, Lise Lillebrygfjeld |
author_facet | Andersen, Terje Halse, Lise Lillebrygfjeld |
author_sort | Andersen, Terje |
collection | PubMed |
description | Electronic waste (e-waste) is a growing waste stream. In Europe, e-waste is regulated by the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) Directive. Each manufacturer or importer is responsible for the end-of-life (EoL) treatment of the equipment it handles, although this task is usually outsourced to producer responsibility organizations (PROs) that collect and treat the e-waste. The WEEE regime has been criticized for focusing on waste handling according to the traditional linear economy, while, in a circular economy, the goal is to eliminate waste. Information sharing helps improve circularity, and digital technology is seen as enabling information transparency and visibility in the supply chain. However, there is need for empirical studies demonstrating the use of information in supply chains to improve circularity. We conducted a case study of a manufacturer, including its subsidiaries and PROs in eight European countries, in which we investigated the product lifecycle information flow related to e-waste. Our findings indicate that product lifecycle information is available, but that it is provided for purposes other than e-waste handling. Actors are willing to share this information, but it is not regarded as useful for EoL treatment since the actors involved in EoL handling believe that using this information could lead to delays and poorer performance in e-waste handling. Our findings contradict the optimistic view of digital technology as improving circularity in circular supply chain management. The findings further give reason to question the implementation of digital technology to improve the product lifecycle information flow as long as the involved actors do not request this information. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9943738 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99437382023-02-22 Product Lifecycle Information Flow in E-waste Handling: a Means to Increase Circularity? Andersen, Terje Halse, Lise Lillebrygfjeld Circ Econ Sustain Original Paper Electronic waste (e-waste) is a growing waste stream. In Europe, e-waste is regulated by the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) Directive. Each manufacturer or importer is responsible for the end-of-life (EoL) treatment of the equipment it handles, although this task is usually outsourced to producer responsibility organizations (PROs) that collect and treat the e-waste. The WEEE regime has been criticized for focusing on waste handling according to the traditional linear economy, while, in a circular economy, the goal is to eliminate waste. Information sharing helps improve circularity, and digital technology is seen as enabling information transparency and visibility in the supply chain. However, there is need for empirical studies demonstrating the use of information in supply chains to improve circularity. We conducted a case study of a manufacturer, including its subsidiaries and PROs in eight European countries, in which we investigated the product lifecycle information flow related to e-waste. Our findings indicate that product lifecycle information is available, but that it is provided for purposes other than e-waste handling. Actors are willing to share this information, but it is not regarded as useful for EoL treatment since the actors involved in EoL handling believe that using this information could lead to delays and poorer performance in e-waste handling. Our findings contradict the optimistic view of digital technology as improving circularity in circular supply chain management. The findings further give reason to question the implementation of digital technology to improve the product lifecycle information flow as long as the involved actors do not request this information. Springer International Publishing 2023-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9943738/ /pubmed/36844893 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43615-023-00258-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Andersen, Terje Halse, Lise Lillebrygfjeld Product Lifecycle Information Flow in E-waste Handling: a Means to Increase Circularity? |
title | Product Lifecycle Information Flow in E-waste Handling: a Means to Increase Circularity? |
title_full | Product Lifecycle Information Flow in E-waste Handling: a Means to Increase Circularity? |
title_fullStr | Product Lifecycle Information Flow in E-waste Handling: a Means to Increase Circularity? |
title_full_unstemmed | Product Lifecycle Information Flow in E-waste Handling: a Means to Increase Circularity? |
title_short | Product Lifecycle Information Flow in E-waste Handling: a Means to Increase Circularity? |
title_sort | product lifecycle information flow in e-waste handling: a means to increase circularity? |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9943738/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36844893 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43615-023-00258-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT andersenterje productlifecycleinformationflowinewastehandlingameanstoincreasecircularity AT halseliselillebrygfjeld productlifecycleinformationflowinewastehandlingameanstoincreasecircularity |