Cargando…
Efficacy and Safety of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Pediatric Malignancies: The LITE-SABR Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE: Limited data are currently available on clinical outcomes after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for pediatric and adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients with cancer. We aimed to perform a systematic review and study-level meta-analysis to characterize associated local control...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9943773/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36845622 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2022.101123 |
_version_ | 1784891778856386560 |
---|---|
author | Singh, Raj Valluri, Anisha Didwania, Prabhanjan Lehrer, Eric J. Baliga, Sujith Hiniker, Susan Braunstein, Steve E. Murphy, Erin S. Lazarev, Stanislav Tinkle, Christopher Terezakis, Stephanie Palmer, Joshua D. |
author_facet | Singh, Raj Valluri, Anisha Didwania, Prabhanjan Lehrer, Eric J. Baliga, Sujith Hiniker, Susan Braunstein, Steve E. Murphy, Erin S. Lazarev, Stanislav Tinkle, Christopher Terezakis, Stephanie Palmer, Joshua D. |
author_sort | Singh, Raj |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Limited data are currently available on clinical outcomes after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for pediatric and adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients with cancer. We aimed to perform a systematic review and study-level meta-analysis to characterize associated local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and toxicity after SBRT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Relevant studies were queried using a Population, Intervention, Control, Outcomes, Study Design (PICOS)/Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)/Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) selection criteria. Primary outcomes were 1-year and 2-year LC as well as incidence of acute and late grade 3 to 5 toxicities, with secondary outcomes of 1-year overall survival and 1-year PFS. Outcome effect sizes were estimated with weighted random effects meta-analyses. Mixed-effects weighted regression models were performed to examine potential correlations between biologically effective dose (BED(10)), LC, and toxicity incidence. RESULTS: Across 9 published studies, we identified 142 pediatric and AYA patients with 217 lesions that were treated with SBRT. Estimated 1-year and 2-year LC rates were 83.5% (95% confidence interval, 70.9%-96.2%) and 74.0% (95% CI, 64.6%-83.4%), respectively, with an estimated acute and late grade 3 to 5 toxicity rate of 2.9% (95% CI, 0.4%-5.4%; all grade 3). The estimated 1-year OS and PFS rates were 75.4% (95% CI, 54.5%-96.3%) and 27.1% (95% CI, 17.3%-37.0%), respectively. On meta-regression, higher BED(10) was correlated with improved 2-year LC with every 10 Gy(10) increase in BED(10) associated with a 5% improvement in 2-year LC (P = .02) in sarcoma-predominant cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: SBRT provided durable LC for pediatric and AYA patients with cancer with minimal severe toxicities. Dose escalation may result in improved LC for sarcoma-predominant cohorts without a subsequent increase in toxicity. However, further investigations with patient-level data and prospective inquiries are indicated to better define the role of SBRT based on patient and tumor-specific characteristics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9943773 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99437732023-02-23 Efficacy and Safety of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Pediatric Malignancies: The LITE-SABR Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Singh, Raj Valluri, Anisha Didwania, Prabhanjan Lehrer, Eric J. Baliga, Sujith Hiniker, Susan Braunstein, Steve E. Murphy, Erin S. Lazarev, Stanislav Tinkle, Christopher Terezakis, Stephanie Palmer, Joshua D. Adv Radiat Oncol Scientific Article PURPOSE: Limited data are currently available on clinical outcomes after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for pediatric and adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients with cancer. We aimed to perform a systematic review and study-level meta-analysis to characterize associated local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and toxicity after SBRT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Relevant studies were queried using a Population, Intervention, Control, Outcomes, Study Design (PICOS)/Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)/Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) selection criteria. Primary outcomes were 1-year and 2-year LC as well as incidence of acute and late grade 3 to 5 toxicities, with secondary outcomes of 1-year overall survival and 1-year PFS. Outcome effect sizes were estimated with weighted random effects meta-analyses. Mixed-effects weighted regression models were performed to examine potential correlations between biologically effective dose (BED(10)), LC, and toxicity incidence. RESULTS: Across 9 published studies, we identified 142 pediatric and AYA patients with 217 lesions that were treated with SBRT. Estimated 1-year and 2-year LC rates were 83.5% (95% confidence interval, 70.9%-96.2%) and 74.0% (95% CI, 64.6%-83.4%), respectively, with an estimated acute and late grade 3 to 5 toxicity rate of 2.9% (95% CI, 0.4%-5.4%; all grade 3). The estimated 1-year OS and PFS rates were 75.4% (95% CI, 54.5%-96.3%) and 27.1% (95% CI, 17.3%-37.0%), respectively. On meta-regression, higher BED(10) was correlated with improved 2-year LC with every 10 Gy(10) increase in BED(10) associated with a 5% improvement in 2-year LC (P = .02) in sarcoma-predominant cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: SBRT provided durable LC for pediatric and AYA patients with cancer with minimal severe toxicities. Dose escalation may result in improved LC for sarcoma-predominant cohorts without a subsequent increase in toxicity. However, further investigations with patient-level data and prospective inquiries are indicated to better define the role of SBRT based on patient and tumor-specific characteristics. Elsevier 2023-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9943773/ /pubmed/36845622 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2022.101123 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Scientific Article Singh, Raj Valluri, Anisha Didwania, Prabhanjan Lehrer, Eric J. Baliga, Sujith Hiniker, Susan Braunstein, Steve E. Murphy, Erin S. Lazarev, Stanislav Tinkle, Christopher Terezakis, Stephanie Palmer, Joshua D. Efficacy and Safety of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Pediatric Malignancies: The LITE-SABR Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Efficacy and Safety of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Pediatric Malignancies: The LITE-SABR Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Efficacy and Safety of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Pediatric Malignancies: The LITE-SABR Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and Safety of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Pediatric Malignancies: The LITE-SABR Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and Safety of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Pediatric Malignancies: The LITE-SABR Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Efficacy and Safety of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Pediatric Malignancies: The LITE-SABR Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiation therapy for pediatric malignancies: the lite-sabr systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Scientific Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9943773/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36845622 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2022.101123 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT singhraj efficacyandsafetyofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforpediatricmalignanciesthelitesabrsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT vallurianisha efficacyandsafetyofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforpediatricmalignanciesthelitesabrsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT didwaniaprabhanjan efficacyandsafetyofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforpediatricmalignanciesthelitesabrsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lehrerericj efficacyandsafetyofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforpediatricmalignanciesthelitesabrsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT baligasujith efficacyandsafetyofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforpediatricmalignanciesthelitesabrsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hinikersusan efficacyandsafetyofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforpediatricmalignanciesthelitesabrsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT braunsteinstevee efficacyandsafetyofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforpediatricmalignanciesthelitesabrsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT murphyerins efficacyandsafetyofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforpediatricmalignanciesthelitesabrsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lazarevstanislav efficacyandsafetyofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforpediatricmalignanciesthelitesabrsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT tinklechristopher efficacyandsafetyofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforpediatricmalignanciesthelitesabrsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT terezakisstephanie efficacyandsafetyofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforpediatricmalignanciesthelitesabrsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT palmerjoshuad efficacyandsafetyofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforpediatricmalignanciesthelitesabrsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |