Cargando…

Efficacy and Safety of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Pediatric Malignancies: The LITE-SABR Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE: Limited data are currently available on clinical outcomes after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for pediatric and adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients with cancer. We aimed to perform a systematic review and study-level meta-analysis to characterize associated local control...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singh, Raj, Valluri, Anisha, Didwania, Prabhanjan, Lehrer, Eric J., Baliga, Sujith, Hiniker, Susan, Braunstein, Steve E., Murphy, Erin S., Lazarev, Stanislav, Tinkle, Christopher, Terezakis, Stephanie, Palmer, Joshua D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9943773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36845622
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2022.101123
_version_ 1784891778856386560
author Singh, Raj
Valluri, Anisha
Didwania, Prabhanjan
Lehrer, Eric J.
Baliga, Sujith
Hiniker, Susan
Braunstein, Steve E.
Murphy, Erin S.
Lazarev, Stanislav
Tinkle, Christopher
Terezakis, Stephanie
Palmer, Joshua D.
author_facet Singh, Raj
Valluri, Anisha
Didwania, Prabhanjan
Lehrer, Eric J.
Baliga, Sujith
Hiniker, Susan
Braunstein, Steve E.
Murphy, Erin S.
Lazarev, Stanislav
Tinkle, Christopher
Terezakis, Stephanie
Palmer, Joshua D.
author_sort Singh, Raj
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Limited data are currently available on clinical outcomes after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for pediatric and adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients with cancer. We aimed to perform a systematic review and study-level meta-analysis to characterize associated local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and toxicity after SBRT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Relevant studies were queried using a Population, Intervention, Control, Outcomes, Study Design (PICOS)/Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)/Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) selection criteria. Primary outcomes were 1-year and 2-year LC as well as incidence of acute and late grade 3 to 5 toxicities, with secondary outcomes of 1-year overall survival and 1-year PFS. Outcome effect sizes were estimated with weighted random effects meta-analyses. Mixed-effects weighted regression models were performed to examine potential correlations between biologically effective dose (BED(10)), LC, and toxicity incidence. RESULTS: Across 9 published studies, we identified 142 pediatric and AYA patients with 217 lesions that were treated with SBRT. Estimated 1-year and 2-year LC rates were 83.5% (95% confidence interval, 70.9%-96.2%) and 74.0% (95% CI, 64.6%-83.4%), respectively, with an estimated acute and late grade 3 to 5 toxicity rate of 2.9% (95% CI, 0.4%-5.4%; all grade 3). The estimated 1-year OS and PFS rates were 75.4% (95% CI, 54.5%-96.3%) and 27.1% (95% CI, 17.3%-37.0%), respectively. On meta-regression, higher BED(10) was correlated with improved 2-year LC with every 10 Gy(10) increase in BED(10) associated with a 5% improvement in 2-year LC (P = .02) in sarcoma-predominant cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: SBRT provided durable LC for pediatric and AYA patients with cancer with minimal severe toxicities. Dose escalation may result in improved LC for sarcoma-predominant cohorts without a subsequent increase in toxicity. However, further investigations with patient-level data and prospective inquiries are indicated to better define the role of SBRT based on patient and tumor-specific characteristics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9943773
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99437732023-02-23 Efficacy and Safety of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Pediatric Malignancies: The LITE-SABR Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Singh, Raj Valluri, Anisha Didwania, Prabhanjan Lehrer, Eric J. Baliga, Sujith Hiniker, Susan Braunstein, Steve E. Murphy, Erin S. Lazarev, Stanislav Tinkle, Christopher Terezakis, Stephanie Palmer, Joshua D. Adv Radiat Oncol Scientific Article PURPOSE: Limited data are currently available on clinical outcomes after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for pediatric and adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients with cancer. We aimed to perform a systematic review and study-level meta-analysis to characterize associated local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and toxicity after SBRT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Relevant studies were queried using a Population, Intervention, Control, Outcomes, Study Design (PICOS)/Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)/Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) selection criteria. Primary outcomes were 1-year and 2-year LC as well as incidence of acute and late grade 3 to 5 toxicities, with secondary outcomes of 1-year overall survival and 1-year PFS. Outcome effect sizes were estimated with weighted random effects meta-analyses. Mixed-effects weighted regression models were performed to examine potential correlations between biologically effective dose (BED(10)), LC, and toxicity incidence. RESULTS: Across 9 published studies, we identified 142 pediatric and AYA patients with 217 lesions that were treated with SBRT. Estimated 1-year and 2-year LC rates were 83.5% (95% confidence interval, 70.9%-96.2%) and 74.0% (95% CI, 64.6%-83.4%), respectively, with an estimated acute and late grade 3 to 5 toxicity rate of 2.9% (95% CI, 0.4%-5.4%; all grade 3). The estimated 1-year OS and PFS rates were 75.4% (95% CI, 54.5%-96.3%) and 27.1% (95% CI, 17.3%-37.0%), respectively. On meta-regression, higher BED(10) was correlated with improved 2-year LC with every 10 Gy(10) increase in BED(10) associated with a 5% improvement in 2-year LC (P = .02) in sarcoma-predominant cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: SBRT provided durable LC for pediatric and AYA patients with cancer with minimal severe toxicities. Dose escalation may result in improved LC for sarcoma-predominant cohorts without a subsequent increase in toxicity. However, further investigations with patient-level data and prospective inquiries are indicated to better define the role of SBRT based on patient and tumor-specific characteristics. Elsevier 2023-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9943773/ /pubmed/36845622 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2022.101123 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Scientific Article
Singh, Raj
Valluri, Anisha
Didwania, Prabhanjan
Lehrer, Eric J.
Baliga, Sujith
Hiniker, Susan
Braunstein, Steve E.
Murphy, Erin S.
Lazarev, Stanislav
Tinkle, Christopher
Terezakis, Stephanie
Palmer, Joshua D.
Efficacy and Safety of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Pediatric Malignancies: The LITE-SABR Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Efficacy and Safety of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Pediatric Malignancies: The LITE-SABR Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Efficacy and Safety of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Pediatric Malignancies: The LITE-SABR Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy and Safety of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Pediatric Malignancies: The LITE-SABR Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Safety of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Pediatric Malignancies: The LITE-SABR Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Efficacy and Safety of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Pediatric Malignancies: The LITE-SABR Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiation therapy for pediatric malignancies: the lite-sabr systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Scientific Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9943773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36845622
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2022.101123
work_keys_str_mv AT singhraj efficacyandsafetyofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforpediatricmalignanciesthelitesabrsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT vallurianisha efficacyandsafetyofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforpediatricmalignanciesthelitesabrsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT didwaniaprabhanjan efficacyandsafetyofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforpediatricmalignanciesthelitesabrsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lehrerericj efficacyandsafetyofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforpediatricmalignanciesthelitesabrsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT baligasujith efficacyandsafetyofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforpediatricmalignanciesthelitesabrsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hinikersusan efficacyandsafetyofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforpediatricmalignanciesthelitesabrsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT braunsteinstevee efficacyandsafetyofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforpediatricmalignanciesthelitesabrsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT murphyerins efficacyandsafetyofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforpediatricmalignanciesthelitesabrsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lazarevstanislav efficacyandsafetyofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforpediatricmalignanciesthelitesabrsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tinklechristopher efficacyandsafetyofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforpediatricmalignanciesthelitesabrsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT terezakisstephanie efficacyandsafetyofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforpediatricmalignanciesthelitesabrsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT palmerjoshuad efficacyandsafetyofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforpediatricmalignanciesthelitesabrsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis