Cargando…
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme endo‐1,3(4)‐β‐glucanase from the non‐genetically modified Cellulosimicrobium funkei strain AE‐TN
The food enzyme endo‐1,3(4)‐β‐glucanase (3‐(1–3;1–4)‐β‐d‐glucan 3(4)‐glucanohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.6) is produced with the non‐genetically modified Cellulosimicrobium funkei strain AE‐TN by Amano Enzyme Inc. The food enzyme was shown to contain viable cells of the production strain, which belongs to a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9943926/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36846390 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7828 |
_version_ | 1784891805359144960 |
---|---|
author | Lambré, Claude Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Lampi, Evgenia Mengelers, Marcel Mortensen, Alicja Rivière, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina Van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Zorn, Holger Herman, Lieve Roos, Yrjö Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena Liu, Yi Lunardi, Simone Nielsen, Elsa Nørby, Karin Chesson, Andrew |
author_facet | Lambré, Claude Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Lampi, Evgenia Mengelers, Marcel Mortensen, Alicja Rivière, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina Van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Zorn, Holger Herman, Lieve Roos, Yrjö Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena Liu, Yi Lunardi, Simone Nielsen, Elsa Nørby, Karin Chesson, Andrew |
collection | PubMed |
description | The food enzyme endo‐1,3(4)‐β‐glucanase (3‐(1–3;1–4)‐β‐d‐glucan 3(4)‐glucanohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.6) is produced with the non‐genetically modified Cellulosimicrobium funkei strain AE‐TN by Amano Enzyme Inc. The food enzyme was shown to contain viable cells of the production strain, which belongs to a species that has been implicated in opportunistic infections in humans. The food enzyme is intended to be used in baking processes and yeast processing. Dietary exposure to the food enzyme total organic solids (TOS) was estimated to be up to 1.75 mg TOS/kg body weight (bw) per day in European populations. Genotoxicity tests did not raise a safety concern. The systemic toxicity was assessed by means of a repeated dose 90‐day oral toxicity study in rats. The Panel identified a no observed adverse effect level of 1,788 mg TOS/kg bw per day, the highest dose tested, which, when compared with the estimated dietary exposure, resulted in a margin of exposure of at least 1,022. A search for the similarity of the amino acid sequence of the food enzyme to known allergens was made and no match was found. The Panel considered that, under the intended conditions of use, the risk of allergic reactions by dietary exposure cannot be excluded, but the likelihood for this to occur is low. However, due to the presence of viable cells of the production strain in the food enzyme, the Panel concluded that the food enzyme cannot be considered safe. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9943926 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99439262023-02-23 Safety evaluation of the food enzyme endo‐1,3(4)‐β‐glucanase from the non‐genetically modified Cellulosimicrobium funkei strain AE‐TN Lambré, Claude Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Lampi, Evgenia Mengelers, Marcel Mortensen, Alicja Rivière, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina Van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Zorn, Holger Herman, Lieve Roos, Yrjö Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena Liu, Yi Lunardi, Simone Nielsen, Elsa Nørby, Karin Chesson, Andrew EFSA J Scientific Opinion The food enzyme endo‐1,3(4)‐β‐glucanase (3‐(1–3;1–4)‐β‐d‐glucan 3(4)‐glucanohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.6) is produced with the non‐genetically modified Cellulosimicrobium funkei strain AE‐TN by Amano Enzyme Inc. The food enzyme was shown to contain viable cells of the production strain, which belongs to a species that has been implicated in opportunistic infections in humans. The food enzyme is intended to be used in baking processes and yeast processing. Dietary exposure to the food enzyme total organic solids (TOS) was estimated to be up to 1.75 mg TOS/kg body weight (bw) per day in European populations. Genotoxicity tests did not raise a safety concern. The systemic toxicity was assessed by means of a repeated dose 90‐day oral toxicity study in rats. The Panel identified a no observed adverse effect level of 1,788 mg TOS/kg bw per day, the highest dose tested, which, when compared with the estimated dietary exposure, resulted in a margin of exposure of at least 1,022. A search for the similarity of the amino acid sequence of the food enzyme to known allergens was made and no match was found. The Panel considered that, under the intended conditions of use, the risk of allergic reactions by dietary exposure cannot be excluded, but the likelihood for this to occur is low. However, due to the presence of viable cells of the production strain in the food enzyme, the Panel concluded that the food enzyme cannot be considered safe. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9943926/ /pubmed/36846390 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7828 Text en © 2023 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Lambré, Claude Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Lampi, Evgenia Mengelers, Marcel Mortensen, Alicja Rivière, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina Van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Zorn, Holger Herman, Lieve Roos, Yrjö Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena Liu, Yi Lunardi, Simone Nielsen, Elsa Nørby, Karin Chesson, Andrew Safety evaluation of the food enzyme endo‐1,3(4)‐β‐glucanase from the non‐genetically modified Cellulosimicrobium funkei strain AE‐TN |
title | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme endo‐1,3(4)‐β‐glucanase from the non‐genetically modified Cellulosimicrobium funkei strain AE‐TN
|
title_full | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme endo‐1,3(4)‐β‐glucanase from the non‐genetically modified Cellulosimicrobium funkei strain AE‐TN
|
title_fullStr | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme endo‐1,3(4)‐β‐glucanase from the non‐genetically modified Cellulosimicrobium funkei strain AE‐TN
|
title_full_unstemmed | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme endo‐1,3(4)‐β‐glucanase from the non‐genetically modified Cellulosimicrobium funkei strain AE‐TN
|
title_short | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme endo‐1,3(4)‐β‐glucanase from the non‐genetically modified Cellulosimicrobium funkei strain AE‐TN
|
title_sort | safety evaluation of the food enzyme endo‐1,3(4)‐β‐glucanase from the non‐genetically modified cellulosimicrobium funkei strain ae‐tn |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9943926/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36846390 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7828 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedcellulosimicrobiumfunkeistrainaetn AT lambreclaude safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedcellulosimicrobiumfunkeistrainaetn AT baratbavierajosemanuel safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedcellulosimicrobiumfunkeistrainaetn AT bolognesiclaudia safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedcellulosimicrobiumfunkeistrainaetn AT cocconcellipiersandro safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedcellulosimicrobiumfunkeistrainaetn AT crebelliriccardo safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedcellulosimicrobiumfunkeistrainaetn AT gottdavidmichael safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedcellulosimicrobiumfunkeistrainaetn AT grobkonrad safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedcellulosimicrobiumfunkeistrainaetn AT lampievgenia safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedcellulosimicrobiumfunkeistrainaetn AT mengelersmarcel safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedcellulosimicrobiumfunkeistrainaetn AT mortensenalicja safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedcellulosimicrobiumfunkeistrainaetn AT rivieregilles safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedcellulosimicrobiumfunkeistrainaetn AT steffenseningerlise safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedcellulosimicrobiumfunkeistrainaetn AT tlustoschristina safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedcellulosimicrobiumfunkeistrainaetn AT vanloverenhenk safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedcellulosimicrobiumfunkeistrainaetn AT vernislaurence safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedcellulosimicrobiumfunkeistrainaetn AT zornholger safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedcellulosimicrobiumfunkeistrainaetn AT hermanlieve safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedcellulosimicrobiumfunkeistrainaetn AT roosyrjo safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedcellulosimicrobiumfunkeistrainaetn AT andryszkiewiczmagdalena safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedcellulosimicrobiumfunkeistrainaetn AT liuyi safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedcellulosimicrobiumfunkeistrainaetn AT lunardisimone safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedcellulosimicrobiumfunkeistrainaetn AT nielsenelsa safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedcellulosimicrobiumfunkeistrainaetn AT nørbykarin safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedcellulosimicrobiumfunkeistrainaetn AT chessonandrew safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedcellulosimicrobiumfunkeistrainaetn |