Cargando…

Safety evaluation of the food enzyme endo‐1,3(4)‐β‐glucanase from the non‐genetically modified Cellulosimicrobium funkei strain AE‐TN

The food enzyme endo‐1,3(4)‐β‐glucanase (3‐(1–3;1–4)‐β‐d‐glucan 3(4)‐glucanohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.6) is produced with the non‐genetically modified Cellulosimicrobium funkei strain AE‐TN by Amano Enzyme Inc. The food enzyme was shown to contain viable cells of the production strain, which belongs to a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lambré, Claude, Barat Baviera, José Manuel, Bolognesi, Claudia, Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro, Crebelli, Riccardo, Gott, David Michael, Grob, Konrad, Lampi, Evgenia, Mengelers, Marcel, Mortensen, Alicja, Rivière, Gilles, Steffensen, Inger‐Lise, Tlustos, Christina, Van Loveren, Henk, Vernis, Laurence, Zorn, Holger, Herman, Lieve, Roos, Yrjö, Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena, Liu, Yi, Lunardi, Simone, Nielsen, Elsa, Nørby, Karin, Chesson, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9943926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36846390
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7828
_version_ 1784891805359144960
author Lambré, Claude
Barat Baviera, José Manuel
Bolognesi, Claudia
Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro
Crebelli, Riccardo
Gott, David Michael
Grob, Konrad
Lampi, Evgenia
Mengelers, Marcel
Mortensen, Alicja
Rivière, Gilles
Steffensen, Inger‐Lise
Tlustos, Christina
Van Loveren, Henk
Vernis, Laurence
Zorn, Holger
Herman, Lieve
Roos, Yrjö
Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena
Liu, Yi
Lunardi, Simone
Nielsen, Elsa
Nørby, Karin
Chesson, Andrew
author_facet Lambré, Claude
Barat Baviera, José Manuel
Bolognesi, Claudia
Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro
Crebelli, Riccardo
Gott, David Michael
Grob, Konrad
Lampi, Evgenia
Mengelers, Marcel
Mortensen, Alicja
Rivière, Gilles
Steffensen, Inger‐Lise
Tlustos, Christina
Van Loveren, Henk
Vernis, Laurence
Zorn, Holger
Herman, Lieve
Roos, Yrjö
Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena
Liu, Yi
Lunardi, Simone
Nielsen, Elsa
Nørby, Karin
Chesson, Andrew
collection PubMed
description The food enzyme endo‐1,3(4)‐β‐glucanase (3‐(1–3;1–4)‐β‐d‐glucan 3(4)‐glucanohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.6) is produced with the non‐genetically modified Cellulosimicrobium funkei strain AE‐TN by Amano Enzyme Inc. The food enzyme was shown to contain viable cells of the production strain, which belongs to a species that has been implicated in opportunistic infections in humans. The food enzyme is intended to be used in baking processes and yeast processing. Dietary exposure to the food enzyme total organic solids (TOS) was estimated to be up to 1.75 mg TOS/kg body weight (bw) per day in European populations. Genotoxicity tests did not raise a safety concern. The systemic toxicity was assessed by means of a repeated dose 90‐day oral toxicity study in rats. The Panel identified a no observed adverse effect level of 1,788 mg TOS/kg bw per day, the highest dose tested, which, when compared with the estimated dietary exposure, resulted in a margin of exposure of at least 1,022. A search for the similarity of the amino acid sequence of the food enzyme to known allergens was made and no match was found. The Panel considered that, under the intended conditions of use, the risk of allergic reactions by dietary exposure cannot be excluded, but the likelihood for this to occur is low. However, due to the presence of viable cells of the production strain in the food enzyme, the Panel concluded that the food enzyme cannot be considered safe.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9943926
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99439262023-02-23 Safety evaluation of the food enzyme endo‐1,3(4)‐β‐glucanase from the non‐genetically modified Cellulosimicrobium funkei strain AE‐TN Lambré, Claude Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Lampi, Evgenia Mengelers, Marcel Mortensen, Alicja Rivière, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina Van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Zorn, Holger Herman, Lieve Roos, Yrjö Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena Liu, Yi Lunardi, Simone Nielsen, Elsa Nørby, Karin Chesson, Andrew EFSA J Scientific Opinion The food enzyme endo‐1,3(4)‐β‐glucanase (3‐(1–3;1–4)‐β‐d‐glucan 3(4)‐glucanohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.6) is produced with the non‐genetically modified Cellulosimicrobium funkei strain AE‐TN by Amano Enzyme Inc. The food enzyme was shown to contain viable cells of the production strain, which belongs to a species that has been implicated in opportunistic infections in humans. The food enzyme is intended to be used in baking processes and yeast processing. Dietary exposure to the food enzyme total organic solids (TOS) was estimated to be up to 1.75 mg TOS/kg body weight (bw) per day in European populations. Genotoxicity tests did not raise a safety concern. The systemic toxicity was assessed by means of a repeated dose 90‐day oral toxicity study in rats. The Panel identified a no observed adverse effect level of 1,788 mg TOS/kg bw per day, the highest dose tested, which, when compared with the estimated dietary exposure, resulted in a margin of exposure of at least 1,022. A search for the similarity of the amino acid sequence of the food enzyme to known allergens was made and no match was found. The Panel considered that, under the intended conditions of use, the risk of allergic reactions by dietary exposure cannot be excluded, but the likelihood for this to occur is low. However, due to the presence of viable cells of the production strain in the food enzyme, the Panel concluded that the food enzyme cannot be considered safe. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9943926/ /pubmed/36846390 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7828 Text en © 2023 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Lambré, Claude
Barat Baviera, José Manuel
Bolognesi, Claudia
Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro
Crebelli, Riccardo
Gott, David Michael
Grob, Konrad
Lampi, Evgenia
Mengelers, Marcel
Mortensen, Alicja
Rivière, Gilles
Steffensen, Inger‐Lise
Tlustos, Christina
Van Loveren, Henk
Vernis, Laurence
Zorn, Holger
Herman, Lieve
Roos, Yrjö
Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena
Liu, Yi
Lunardi, Simone
Nielsen, Elsa
Nørby, Karin
Chesson, Andrew
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme endo‐1,3(4)‐β‐glucanase from the non‐genetically modified Cellulosimicrobium funkei strain AE‐TN
title Safety evaluation of the food enzyme endo‐1,3(4)‐β‐glucanase from the non‐genetically modified Cellulosimicrobium funkei strain AE‐TN
title_full Safety evaluation of the food enzyme endo‐1,3(4)‐β‐glucanase from the non‐genetically modified Cellulosimicrobium funkei strain AE‐TN
title_fullStr Safety evaluation of the food enzyme endo‐1,3(4)‐β‐glucanase from the non‐genetically modified Cellulosimicrobium funkei strain AE‐TN
title_full_unstemmed Safety evaluation of the food enzyme endo‐1,3(4)‐β‐glucanase from the non‐genetically modified Cellulosimicrobium funkei strain AE‐TN
title_short Safety evaluation of the food enzyme endo‐1,3(4)‐β‐glucanase from the non‐genetically modified Cellulosimicrobium funkei strain AE‐TN
title_sort safety evaluation of the food enzyme endo‐1,3(4)‐β‐glucanase from the non‐genetically modified cellulosimicrobium funkei strain ae‐tn
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9943926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36846390
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7828
work_keys_str_mv AT safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedcellulosimicrobiumfunkeistrainaetn
AT lambreclaude safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedcellulosimicrobiumfunkeistrainaetn
AT baratbavierajosemanuel safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedcellulosimicrobiumfunkeistrainaetn
AT bolognesiclaudia safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedcellulosimicrobiumfunkeistrainaetn
AT cocconcellipiersandro safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedcellulosimicrobiumfunkeistrainaetn
AT crebelliriccardo safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedcellulosimicrobiumfunkeistrainaetn
AT gottdavidmichael safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedcellulosimicrobiumfunkeistrainaetn
AT grobkonrad safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedcellulosimicrobiumfunkeistrainaetn
AT lampievgenia safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedcellulosimicrobiumfunkeistrainaetn
AT mengelersmarcel safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedcellulosimicrobiumfunkeistrainaetn
AT mortensenalicja safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedcellulosimicrobiumfunkeistrainaetn
AT rivieregilles safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedcellulosimicrobiumfunkeistrainaetn
AT steffenseningerlise safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedcellulosimicrobiumfunkeistrainaetn
AT tlustoschristina safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedcellulosimicrobiumfunkeistrainaetn
AT vanloverenhenk safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedcellulosimicrobiumfunkeistrainaetn
AT vernislaurence safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedcellulosimicrobiumfunkeistrainaetn
AT zornholger safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedcellulosimicrobiumfunkeistrainaetn
AT hermanlieve safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedcellulosimicrobiumfunkeistrainaetn
AT roosyrjo safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedcellulosimicrobiumfunkeistrainaetn
AT andryszkiewiczmagdalena safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedcellulosimicrobiumfunkeistrainaetn
AT liuyi safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedcellulosimicrobiumfunkeistrainaetn
AT lunardisimone safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedcellulosimicrobiumfunkeistrainaetn
AT nielsenelsa safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedcellulosimicrobiumfunkeistrainaetn
AT nørbykarin safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedcellulosimicrobiumfunkeistrainaetn
AT chessonandrew safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedcellulosimicrobiumfunkeistrainaetn