Cargando…

Robotic versus laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) approaches to bilateral hernia repair: a multicenter retrospective study using propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND: Since the introduction of minimally invasive surgery, new techniques like transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair have progressively gained acceptance for the treatment of groin hernia. Laparoscopic TAPP (LTAPP) is recommended for bilateral repairs. Likewise, the introduction of robot...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peltrini, Roberto, Corcione, Francesco, Pacella, Daniela, Castiglioni, Simone, Lionetti, Ruggero, Andreuccetti, Jacopo, Pignata, Giusto, De Nisco, Carlo, Ferraro, Luca, Salaj, Adelona, Formisano, Giampaolo, Bianchi, Paolo Pietro, Bracale, Umberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9943997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36156737
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09614-y
_version_ 1784891820837175296
author Peltrini, Roberto
Corcione, Francesco
Pacella, Daniela
Castiglioni, Simone
Lionetti, Ruggero
Andreuccetti, Jacopo
Pignata, Giusto
De Nisco, Carlo
Ferraro, Luca
Salaj, Adelona
Formisano, Giampaolo
Bianchi, Paolo Pietro
Bracale, Umberto
author_facet Peltrini, Roberto
Corcione, Francesco
Pacella, Daniela
Castiglioni, Simone
Lionetti, Ruggero
Andreuccetti, Jacopo
Pignata, Giusto
De Nisco, Carlo
Ferraro, Luca
Salaj, Adelona
Formisano, Giampaolo
Bianchi, Paolo Pietro
Bracale, Umberto
author_sort Peltrini, Roberto
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Since the introduction of minimally invasive surgery, new techniques like transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair have progressively gained acceptance for the treatment of groin hernia. Laparoscopic TAPP (LTAPP) is recommended for bilateral repairs. Likewise, the introduction of robotic platforms has promised additional surgical benefits for robotic TAPP (RTAPP), which are yet to be confirmed. This study compared multicenter data obtained from patients undergoing bilateral inguinal hernia repair with RTAPP, performed during the preliminary learning curve period, versus conventional LTAPP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All consecutive bilateral inguinal hernia patients from four Italian centers between June 2015 and July 2020 were selected. A propensity score model was used to compare patients treated with LTAPP versus RTAPP, considering sex, age, body mass index, current smoking status, overall comorbidity, hernia classification (primary or recurrent), and associated procedures as covariates. After matching, intraoperative details and postoperative outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 275 LTAPP and 40 RTAPP were performed. After matching, 80 and 40 patients were allocated to the LTAPP and RTAPP cohorts, respectively. No intraoperative complications or conversion to open surgery occurred. However, a longer operative time was recorded in the RTAPP group (79 ± 21 versus 98 ± 29 min; p < 0.001). Postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores (p = 0.13) did not differ and complication rates were similar. There were no clinical recurrences in either group, with mean follow-up periods of 52 ± 14 (LTAPP) and 35 ± 8 (RTAPP) months. A statistical difference in length of hospital stay was found between the groups (1.05 ± 0.22 vs 1.50 ± 0.74 days; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In this patient population, outcomes for bilateral inguinal hernia repair appear comparable for RTAPP and LTAPP, except for a shorter recovery after laparoscopic surgery. A longer operative time for robotic surgery could be attributable to the learning curve period of each center.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9943997
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99439972023-02-23 Robotic versus laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) approaches to bilateral hernia repair: a multicenter retrospective study using propensity score matching analysis Peltrini, Roberto Corcione, Francesco Pacella, Daniela Castiglioni, Simone Lionetti, Ruggero Andreuccetti, Jacopo Pignata, Giusto De Nisco, Carlo Ferraro, Luca Salaj, Adelona Formisano, Giampaolo Bianchi, Paolo Pietro Bracale, Umberto Surg Endosc Original Article BACKGROUND: Since the introduction of minimally invasive surgery, new techniques like transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair have progressively gained acceptance for the treatment of groin hernia. Laparoscopic TAPP (LTAPP) is recommended for bilateral repairs. Likewise, the introduction of robotic platforms has promised additional surgical benefits for robotic TAPP (RTAPP), which are yet to be confirmed. This study compared multicenter data obtained from patients undergoing bilateral inguinal hernia repair with RTAPP, performed during the preliminary learning curve period, versus conventional LTAPP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All consecutive bilateral inguinal hernia patients from four Italian centers between June 2015 and July 2020 were selected. A propensity score model was used to compare patients treated with LTAPP versus RTAPP, considering sex, age, body mass index, current smoking status, overall comorbidity, hernia classification (primary or recurrent), and associated procedures as covariates. After matching, intraoperative details and postoperative outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 275 LTAPP and 40 RTAPP were performed. After matching, 80 and 40 patients were allocated to the LTAPP and RTAPP cohorts, respectively. No intraoperative complications or conversion to open surgery occurred. However, a longer operative time was recorded in the RTAPP group (79 ± 21 versus 98 ± 29 min; p < 0.001). Postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores (p = 0.13) did not differ and complication rates were similar. There were no clinical recurrences in either group, with mean follow-up periods of 52 ± 14 (LTAPP) and 35 ± 8 (RTAPP) months. A statistical difference in length of hospital stay was found between the groups (1.05 ± 0.22 vs 1.50 ± 0.74 days; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In this patient population, outcomes for bilateral inguinal hernia repair appear comparable for RTAPP and LTAPP, except for a shorter recovery after laparoscopic surgery. A longer operative time for robotic surgery could be attributable to the learning curve period of each center. Springer US 2022-09-26 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9943997/ /pubmed/36156737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09614-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Peltrini, Roberto
Corcione, Francesco
Pacella, Daniela
Castiglioni, Simone
Lionetti, Ruggero
Andreuccetti, Jacopo
Pignata, Giusto
De Nisco, Carlo
Ferraro, Luca
Salaj, Adelona
Formisano, Giampaolo
Bianchi, Paolo Pietro
Bracale, Umberto
Robotic versus laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) approaches to bilateral hernia repair: a multicenter retrospective study using propensity score matching analysis
title Robotic versus laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) approaches to bilateral hernia repair: a multicenter retrospective study using propensity score matching analysis
title_full Robotic versus laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) approaches to bilateral hernia repair: a multicenter retrospective study using propensity score matching analysis
title_fullStr Robotic versus laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) approaches to bilateral hernia repair: a multicenter retrospective study using propensity score matching analysis
title_full_unstemmed Robotic versus laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) approaches to bilateral hernia repair: a multicenter retrospective study using propensity score matching analysis
title_short Robotic versus laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) approaches to bilateral hernia repair: a multicenter retrospective study using propensity score matching analysis
title_sort robotic versus laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (tapp) approaches to bilateral hernia repair: a multicenter retrospective study using propensity score matching analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9943997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36156737
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09614-y
work_keys_str_mv AT peltriniroberto roboticversuslaparoscopictransabdominalpreperitonealtappapproachestobilateralherniarepairamulticenterretrospectivestudyusingpropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT corcionefrancesco roboticversuslaparoscopictransabdominalpreperitonealtappapproachestobilateralherniarepairamulticenterretrospectivestudyusingpropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT pacelladaniela roboticversuslaparoscopictransabdominalpreperitonealtappapproachestobilateralherniarepairamulticenterretrospectivestudyusingpropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT castiglionisimone roboticversuslaparoscopictransabdominalpreperitonealtappapproachestobilateralherniarepairamulticenterretrospectivestudyusingpropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT lionettiruggero roboticversuslaparoscopictransabdominalpreperitonealtappapproachestobilateralherniarepairamulticenterretrospectivestudyusingpropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT andreuccettijacopo roboticversuslaparoscopictransabdominalpreperitonealtappapproachestobilateralherniarepairamulticenterretrospectivestudyusingpropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT pignatagiusto roboticversuslaparoscopictransabdominalpreperitonealtappapproachestobilateralherniarepairamulticenterretrospectivestudyusingpropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT deniscocarlo roboticversuslaparoscopictransabdominalpreperitonealtappapproachestobilateralherniarepairamulticenterretrospectivestudyusingpropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT ferraroluca roboticversuslaparoscopictransabdominalpreperitonealtappapproachestobilateralherniarepairamulticenterretrospectivestudyusingpropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT salajadelona roboticversuslaparoscopictransabdominalpreperitonealtappapproachestobilateralherniarepairamulticenterretrospectivestudyusingpropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT formisanogiampaolo roboticversuslaparoscopictransabdominalpreperitonealtappapproachestobilateralherniarepairamulticenterretrospectivestudyusingpropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT bianchipaolopietro roboticversuslaparoscopictransabdominalpreperitonealtappapproachestobilateralherniarepairamulticenterretrospectivestudyusingpropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT bracaleumberto roboticversuslaparoscopictransabdominalpreperitonealtappapproachestobilateralherniarepairamulticenterretrospectivestudyusingpropensityscorematchinganalysis