Cargando…
The Differential Contribution of Macular Pigments and Foveal Anatomy to the Perception of Maxwell’s Spot and Haidinger’s Brushes
The relationship of macular pigments and foveal anatomy to the perception of Maxwell’s spot (MS) and Haidinger’s brushes (HB) entoptic phenomena were investigated. Dual-wavelength-autofluorescence and OCT were used to define macular pigment density and foveal anatomy in 52 eyes. MS was generated by...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9944110/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36810315 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vision7010011 |
_version_ | 1784891845418942464 |
---|---|
author | Misson, Gary P. Heitmar, Rebekka Armstrong, Richard Anderson, Stephen J. |
author_facet | Misson, Gary P. Heitmar, Rebekka Armstrong, Richard Anderson, Stephen J. |
author_sort | Misson, Gary P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The relationship of macular pigments and foveal anatomy to the perception of Maxwell’s spot (MS) and Haidinger’s brushes (HB) entoptic phenomena were investigated. Dual-wavelength-autofluorescence and OCT were used to define macular pigment density and foveal anatomy in 52 eyes. MS was generated by alternating unpolarized red/blue and red/green uniform field illumination. HB was generated by alternating the linear polarization axis of a uniform blue field. In Experiment 1, horizontal widths of MS and HB were measured using a micrometer system and compared with macular pigment densities and OCT-defined morphometry. MS radius (mean 1.4°) was significantly less than HB radius (mean 1.6°), with the spatial extent of both phenomena falling between the boundaries of the foveola and foveal pit. Multiple regression showed MS and HB radii to be significantly associated with the macular pigment spatial profile radius. HB radius, but not MS radius, was also significantly associated with foveolar morphometry. Experiment 2 compared perceptual profiles of MS with macular pigment distribution patterns and demonstrated close agreement. The size and appearance of MS is a direct indicator of macular pigment density and distribution. Measures of HB radii are less specific, with dependence on both macular pigment density and foveal structure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9944110 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99441102023-02-23 The Differential Contribution of Macular Pigments and Foveal Anatomy to the Perception of Maxwell’s Spot and Haidinger’s Brushes Misson, Gary P. Heitmar, Rebekka Armstrong, Richard Anderson, Stephen J. Vision (Basel) Article The relationship of macular pigments and foveal anatomy to the perception of Maxwell’s spot (MS) and Haidinger’s brushes (HB) entoptic phenomena were investigated. Dual-wavelength-autofluorescence and OCT were used to define macular pigment density and foveal anatomy in 52 eyes. MS was generated by alternating unpolarized red/blue and red/green uniform field illumination. HB was generated by alternating the linear polarization axis of a uniform blue field. In Experiment 1, horizontal widths of MS and HB were measured using a micrometer system and compared with macular pigment densities and OCT-defined morphometry. MS radius (mean 1.4°) was significantly less than HB radius (mean 1.6°), with the spatial extent of both phenomena falling between the boundaries of the foveola and foveal pit. Multiple regression showed MS and HB radii to be significantly associated with the macular pigment spatial profile radius. HB radius, but not MS radius, was also significantly associated with foveolar morphometry. Experiment 2 compared perceptual profiles of MS with macular pigment distribution patterns and demonstrated close agreement. The size and appearance of MS is a direct indicator of macular pigment density and distribution. Measures of HB radii are less specific, with dependence on both macular pigment density and foveal structure. MDPI 2023-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9944110/ /pubmed/36810315 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vision7010011 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Misson, Gary P. Heitmar, Rebekka Armstrong, Richard Anderson, Stephen J. The Differential Contribution of Macular Pigments and Foveal Anatomy to the Perception of Maxwell’s Spot and Haidinger’s Brushes |
title | The Differential Contribution of Macular Pigments and Foveal Anatomy to the Perception of Maxwell’s Spot and Haidinger’s Brushes |
title_full | The Differential Contribution of Macular Pigments and Foveal Anatomy to the Perception of Maxwell’s Spot and Haidinger’s Brushes |
title_fullStr | The Differential Contribution of Macular Pigments and Foveal Anatomy to the Perception of Maxwell’s Spot and Haidinger’s Brushes |
title_full_unstemmed | The Differential Contribution of Macular Pigments and Foveal Anatomy to the Perception of Maxwell’s Spot and Haidinger’s Brushes |
title_short | The Differential Contribution of Macular Pigments and Foveal Anatomy to the Perception of Maxwell’s Spot and Haidinger’s Brushes |
title_sort | differential contribution of macular pigments and foveal anatomy to the perception of maxwell’s spot and haidinger’s brushes |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9944110/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36810315 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vision7010011 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT missongaryp thedifferentialcontributionofmacularpigmentsandfovealanatomytotheperceptionofmaxwellsspotandhaidingersbrushes AT heitmarrebekka thedifferentialcontributionofmacularpigmentsandfovealanatomytotheperceptionofmaxwellsspotandhaidingersbrushes AT armstrongrichard thedifferentialcontributionofmacularpigmentsandfovealanatomytotheperceptionofmaxwellsspotandhaidingersbrushes AT andersonstephenj thedifferentialcontributionofmacularpigmentsandfovealanatomytotheperceptionofmaxwellsspotandhaidingersbrushes AT missongaryp differentialcontributionofmacularpigmentsandfovealanatomytotheperceptionofmaxwellsspotandhaidingersbrushes AT heitmarrebekka differentialcontributionofmacularpigmentsandfovealanatomytotheperceptionofmaxwellsspotandhaidingersbrushes AT armstrongrichard differentialcontributionofmacularpigmentsandfovealanatomytotheperceptionofmaxwellsspotandhaidingersbrushes AT andersonstephenj differentialcontributionofmacularpigmentsandfovealanatomytotheperceptionofmaxwellsspotandhaidingersbrushes |