Cargando…

Mechanistic in vitro studies indicate that the clinical drug–drug interactions between protease inhibitors and rosuvastatin are driven by inhibition of intestinal BCRP and hepatic OATP1B1 with minimal contribution from OATP1B3, NTCP and OAT3

Previous use of a mechanistic static model to accurately quantify the increased rosuvastatin exposure due to drug–drug interaction (DDI) with coadministered atazanavir underpredicted the magnitude of area under the plasma concentration–time curve ratio (AUCR) based on inhibition of breast cancer res...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elsby, Robert, Coghlan, Hannah, Edgerton, Jacob, Hodgson, David, Outteridge, Samuel, Atkinson, Hayley
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9944867/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36811234
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prp2.1060
_version_ 1784892012014600192
author Elsby, Robert
Coghlan, Hannah
Edgerton, Jacob
Hodgson, David
Outteridge, Samuel
Atkinson, Hayley
author_facet Elsby, Robert
Coghlan, Hannah
Edgerton, Jacob
Hodgson, David
Outteridge, Samuel
Atkinson, Hayley
author_sort Elsby, Robert
collection PubMed
description Previous use of a mechanistic static model to accurately quantify the increased rosuvastatin exposure due to drug–drug interaction (DDI) with coadministered atazanavir underpredicted the magnitude of area under the plasma concentration–time curve ratio (AUCR) based on inhibition of breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) and organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B1. To reconcile the disconnect between predicted and clinical AUCR, atazanavir and other protease inhibitors (darunavir, lopinavir and ritonavir) were evaluated as inhibitors of BCRP, OATP1B1, OATP1B3, sodium taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide (NTCP) and organic anion transporter (OAT) 3. None of the drugs inhibited OAT3, nor did darunavir and ritonavir inhibit OATP1B3 or NTCP. All drugs inhibited BCRP‐mediated estrone 3‐sulfate transport or OATP1B1‐mediated estradiol 17β‐D‐glucuronide transport with the same rank order of inhibitory potency (lopinavir>ritonavir>atazanavir>>darunavir) and mean IC(50) values ranging from 15.5 ± 2.80 μM to 143 ± 14.7 μM or 0.220 ± 0.0655 μM to 9.53 ± 2.50 μM, respectively. Atazanavir and lopinavir also inhibited OATP1B3‐ or NTCP‐mediated transport with a mean IC(50) of 1.86 ± 0.500 μM or 65.6 ± 10.7 μM and 5.04 ± 0.0950 μM or 20.3 ± 2.13 μM, respectively. Following integration of a combined hepatic transport component into the previous mechanistic static model using the in vitro inhibitory kinetic parameters determined above for atazanavir, the newly predicted rosuvastatin AUCR reconciled with the clinically observed AUCR confirming additional minor involvement of OATP1B3 and NTCP inhibition in its DDI. The predictions for the other protease inhibitors confirmed inhibition of intestinal BCRP and hepatic OATP1B1 as the principal pathways involved in their clinical DDI with rosuvastatin.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9944867
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99448672023-02-23 Mechanistic in vitro studies indicate that the clinical drug–drug interactions between protease inhibitors and rosuvastatin are driven by inhibition of intestinal BCRP and hepatic OATP1B1 with minimal contribution from OATP1B3, NTCP and OAT3 Elsby, Robert Coghlan, Hannah Edgerton, Jacob Hodgson, David Outteridge, Samuel Atkinson, Hayley Pharmacol Res Perspect Original Articles Previous use of a mechanistic static model to accurately quantify the increased rosuvastatin exposure due to drug–drug interaction (DDI) with coadministered atazanavir underpredicted the magnitude of area under the plasma concentration–time curve ratio (AUCR) based on inhibition of breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) and organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B1. To reconcile the disconnect between predicted and clinical AUCR, atazanavir and other protease inhibitors (darunavir, lopinavir and ritonavir) were evaluated as inhibitors of BCRP, OATP1B1, OATP1B3, sodium taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide (NTCP) and organic anion transporter (OAT) 3. None of the drugs inhibited OAT3, nor did darunavir and ritonavir inhibit OATP1B3 or NTCP. All drugs inhibited BCRP‐mediated estrone 3‐sulfate transport or OATP1B1‐mediated estradiol 17β‐D‐glucuronide transport with the same rank order of inhibitory potency (lopinavir>ritonavir>atazanavir>>darunavir) and mean IC(50) values ranging from 15.5 ± 2.80 μM to 143 ± 14.7 μM or 0.220 ± 0.0655 μM to 9.53 ± 2.50 μM, respectively. Atazanavir and lopinavir also inhibited OATP1B3‐ or NTCP‐mediated transport with a mean IC(50) of 1.86 ± 0.500 μM or 65.6 ± 10.7 μM and 5.04 ± 0.0950 μM or 20.3 ± 2.13 μM, respectively. Following integration of a combined hepatic transport component into the previous mechanistic static model using the in vitro inhibitory kinetic parameters determined above for atazanavir, the newly predicted rosuvastatin AUCR reconciled with the clinically observed AUCR confirming additional minor involvement of OATP1B3 and NTCP inhibition in its DDI. The predictions for the other protease inhibitors confirmed inhibition of intestinal BCRP and hepatic OATP1B1 as the principal pathways involved in their clinical DDI with rosuvastatin. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9944867/ /pubmed/36811234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prp2.1060 Text en © 2023 Cyprotex Discovery Ltd. Pharmacology Research & Perspectives published by British Pharmacological Society and American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Elsby, Robert
Coghlan, Hannah
Edgerton, Jacob
Hodgson, David
Outteridge, Samuel
Atkinson, Hayley
Mechanistic in vitro studies indicate that the clinical drug–drug interactions between protease inhibitors and rosuvastatin are driven by inhibition of intestinal BCRP and hepatic OATP1B1 with minimal contribution from OATP1B3, NTCP and OAT3
title Mechanistic in vitro studies indicate that the clinical drug–drug interactions between protease inhibitors and rosuvastatin are driven by inhibition of intestinal BCRP and hepatic OATP1B1 with minimal contribution from OATP1B3, NTCP and OAT3
title_full Mechanistic in vitro studies indicate that the clinical drug–drug interactions between protease inhibitors and rosuvastatin are driven by inhibition of intestinal BCRP and hepatic OATP1B1 with minimal contribution from OATP1B3, NTCP and OAT3
title_fullStr Mechanistic in vitro studies indicate that the clinical drug–drug interactions between protease inhibitors and rosuvastatin are driven by inhibition of intestinal BCRP and hepatic OATP1B1 with minimal contribution from OATP1B3, NTCP and OAT3
title_full_unstemmed Mechanistic in vitro studies indicate that the clinical drug–drug interactions between protease inhibitors and rosuvastatin are driven by inhibition of intestinal BCRP and hepatic OATP1B1 with minimal contribution from OATP1B3, NTCP and OAT3
title_short Mechanistic in vitro studies indicate that the clinical drug–drug interactions between protease inhibitors and rosuvastatin are driven by inhibition of intestinal BCRP and hepatic OATP1B1 with minimal contribution from OATP1B3, NTCP and OAT3
title_sort mechanistic in vitro studies indicate that the clinical drug–drug interactions between protease inhibitors and rosuvastatin are driven by inhibition of intestinal bcrp and hepatic oatp1b1 with minimal contribution from oatp1b3, ntcp and oat3
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9944867/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36811234
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prp2.1060
work_keys_str_mv AT elsbyrobert mechanisticinvitrostudiesindicatethattheclinicaldrugdruginteractionsbetweenproteaseinhibitorsandrosuvastatinaredrivenbyinhibitionofintestinalbcrpandhepaticoatp1b1withminimalcontributionfromoatp1b3ntcpandoat3
AT coghlanhannah mechanisticinvitrostudiesindicatethattheclinicaldrugdruginteractionsbetweenproteaseinhibitorsandrosuvastatinaredrivenbyinhibitionofintestinalbcrpandhepaticoatp1b1withminimalcontributionfromoatp1b3ntcpandoat3
AT edgertonjacob mechanisticinvitrostudiesindicatethattheclinicaldrugdruginteractionsbetweenproteaseinhibitorsandrosuvastatinaredrivenbyinhibitionofintestinalbcrpandhepaticoatp1b1withminimalcontributionfromoatp1b3ntcpandoat3
AT hodgsondavid mechanisticinvitrostudiesindicatethattheclinicaldrugdruginteractionsbetweenproteaseinhibitorsandrosuvastatinaredrivenbyinhibitionofintestinalbcrpandhepaticoatp1b1withminimalcontributionfromoatp1b3ntcpandoat3
AT outteridgesamuel mechanisticinvitrostudiesindicatethattheclinicaldrugdruginteractionsbetweenproteaseinhibitorsandrosuvastatinaredrivenbyinhibitionofintestinalbcrpandhepaticoatp1b1withminimalcontributionfromoatp1b3ntcpandoat3
AT atkinsonhayley mechanisticinvitrostudiesindicatethattheclinicaldrugdruginteractionsbetweenproteaseinhibitorsandrosuvastatinaredrivenbyinhibitionofintestinalbcrpandhepaticoatp1b1withminimalcontributionfromoatp1b3ntcpandoat3