Cargando…

Implementation of the robotic abdominal phase during robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE): results from a high-volume center

BACKGROUND: Evidence on the added value of robotic-assistance in the abdominal phase during esophagectomy is scarce. In 2003, our center implemented the robotic thoracic phase for esophagectomy. In November 2018 the robot was also implemented in the abdominal phase. The aim of this study was to eval...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Groot, E. M., Goense, L., Kingma, B. F., van den Berg, J. W., Ruurda, J. P., van Hillegersberg, R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9945034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36203109
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09681-1
_version_ 1784892051419037696
author de Groot, E. M.
Goense, L.
Kingma, B. F.
van den Berg, J. W.
Ruurda, J. P.
van Hillegersberg, R.
author_facet de Groot, E. M.
Goense, L.
Kingma, B. F.
van den Berg, J. W.
Ruurda, J. P.
van Hillegersberg, R.
author_sort de Groot, E. M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Evidence on the added value of robotic-assistance in the abdominal phase during esophagectomy is scarce. In 2003, our center implemented the robotic thoracic phase for esophagectomy. In November 2018 the robot was also implemented in the abdominal phase. The aim of this study was to evaluate the implementation of the abdominal phase during robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE). METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent full RAMIE with intrathoracic anastomosis for esophageal cancer were included. Patients were extracted from a prospectively maintained institutional database. A cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was performed for abdominal operation time and abdominal lymph node yield. Intraoperative, postoperative and oncological outcomes including collected lymph nodes per abdominal lymph node station were reported. RESULTS: Between 2018 and 2021, 70 consecutive patients were included. The majority of the patients had an adenocarcinoma (n = 55, 77%) and underwent neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy (n = 65, 95%). The median operative time for the abdominal phase was 180 min (range 110–233). The CUSUM analysis for abdominal operation time showed a plateau at case 22. There were no intraoperative complications or conversions during the abdominal phase. The most common postoperative complications were pneumonia (n = 18, 26%) and anastomotic leakage (n = 14, 20%). Radical resection margins were achieved in 69 (99%) patients. The median total lymph node yield was 42 (range 23–83) and the median abdominal lymph node yield was 16 (range 2–43). The CUSUM analysis for abdominal lymph node yield showed a plateau at case 21. Most abdominal lymph nodes were collected from the left gastric artery (median 4, range 0–20). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that a robotic abdominal phase was safely implemented for RAMIE without compromising intraoperative, postoperative and oncological outcomes. The learning curve is estimated to be 22 cases in a high-volume center with experienced upper GI robotic surgeons.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9945034
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99450342023-02-23 Implementation of the robotic abdominal phase during robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE): results from a high-volume center de Groot, E. M. Goense, L. Kingma, B. F. van den Berg, J. W. Ruurda, J. P. van Hillegersberg, R. Surg Endosc Original Article BACKGROUND: Evidence on the added value of robotic-assistance in the abdominal phase during esophagectomy is scarce. In 2003, our center implemented the robotic thoracic phase for esophagectomy. In November 2018 the robot was also implemented in the abdominal phase. The aim of this study was to evaluate the implementation of the abdominal phase during robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE). METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent full RAMIE with intrathoracic anastomosis for esophageal cancer were included. Patients were extracted from a prospectively maintained institutional database. A cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was performed for abdominal operation time and abdominal lymph node yield. Intraoperative, postoperative and oncological outcomes including collected lymph nodes per abdominal lymph node station were reported. RESULTS: Between 2018 and 2021, 70 consecutive patients were included. The majority of the patients had an adenocarcinoma (n = 55, 77%) and underwent neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy (n = 65, 95%). The median operative time for the abdominal phase was 180 min (range 110–233). The CUSUM analysis for abdominal operation time showed a plateau at case 22. There were no intraoperative complications or conversions during the abdominal phase. The most common postoperative complications were pneumonia (n = 18, 26%) and anastomotic leakage (n = 14, 20%). Radical resection margins were achieved in 69 (99%) patients. The median total lymph node yield was 42 (range 23–83) and the median abdominal lymph node yield was 16 (range 2–43). The CUSUM analysis for abdominal lymph node yield showed a plateau at case 21. Most abdominal lymph nodes were collected from the left gastric artery (median 4, range 0–20). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that a robotic abdominal phase was safely implemented for RAMIE without compromising intraoperative, postoperative and oncological outcomes. The learning curve is estimated to be 22 cases in a high-volume center with experienced upper GI robotic surgeons. Springer US 2022-10-06 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9945034/ /pubmed/36203109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09681-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
de Groot, E. M.
Goense, L.
Kingma, B. F.
van den Berg, J. W.
Ruurda, J. P.
van Hillegersberg, R.
Implementation of the robotic abdominal phase during robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE): results from a high-volume center
title Implementation of the robotic abdominal phase during robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE): results from a high-volume center
title_full Implementation of the robotic abdominal phase during robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE): results from a high-volume center
title_fullStr Implementation of the robotic abdominal phase during robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE): results from a high-volume center
title_full_unstemmed Implementation of the robotic abdominal phase during robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE): results from a high-volume center
title_short Implementation of the robotic abdominal phase during robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE): results from a high-volume center
title_sort implementation of the robotic abdominal phase during robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (ramie): results from a high-volume center
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9945034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36203109
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09681-1
work_keys_str_mv AT degrootem implementationoftheroboticabdominalphaseduringrobotassistedminimallyinvasiveesophagectomyramieresultsfromahighvolumecenter
AT goensel implementationoftheroboticabdominalphaseduringrobotassistedminimallyinvasiveesophagectomyramieresultsfromahighvolumecenter
AT kingmabf implementationoftheroboticabdominalphaseduringrobotassistedminimallyinvasiveesophagectomyramieresultsfromahighvolumecenter
AT vandenbergjw implementationoftheroboticabdominalphaseduringrobotassistedminimallyinvasiveesophagectomyramieresultsfromahighvolumecenter
AT ruurdajp implementationoftheroboticabdominalphaseduringrobotassistedminimallyinvasiveesophagectomyramieresultsfromahighvolumecenter
AT vanhillegersbergr implementationoftheroboticabdominalphaseduringrobotassistedminimallyinvasiveesophagectomyramieresultsfromahighvolumecenter