Cargando…

A predictive model for consciousness recovery of comatose patients after acute brain injury

BACKGROUND: Predicting the consciousness recovery for comatose patients with acute brain injury is an important issue. Although some efforts have been made in the study of prognostic assessment methods, it is still unclear which factors can be used to establish model to directly predict the probabil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Liang, Chen, Yuanyi, Liu, Ziyuan, You, Jia, Chen, Siming, Liu, Ganzhi, Yu, Yang, Wang, Jian, Chen, Xin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9945265/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36845443
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1088666
_version_ 1784892102963888128
author Zhou, Liang
Chen, Yuanyi
Liu, Ziyuan
You, Jia
Chen, Siming
Liu, Ganzhi
Yu, Yang
Wang, Jian
Chen, Xin
author_facet Zhou, Liang
Chen, Yuanyi
Liu, Ziyuan
You, Jia
Chen, Siming
Liu, Ganzhi
Yu, Yang
Wang, Jian
Chen, Xin
author_sort Zhou, Liang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Predicting the consciousness recovery for comatose patients with acute brain injury is an important issue. Although some efforts have been made in the study of prognostic assessment methods, it is still unclear which factors can be used to establish model to directly predict the probability of consciousness recovery. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to establish a model using clinical and neuroelectrophysiological indicators to predict consciousness recovery of comatose patients after acute brain injury. METHODS: The clinical data of patients with acute brain injury admitted to the neurosurgical intensive care unit of Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from May 2019 to May 2022, who underwent electroencephalogram (EEG) and auditory mismatch negativity (MMN) examinations within 28 days after coma onset, were collected. The prognosis was assessed by Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) at 3 months after coma onset. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis was applied to select the most relevant predictors. We combined Glasgow coma scale (GCS), EEG, and absolute amplitude of MMN at Fz to develop a predictive model using binary logistic regression and then presented by a nomogram. The predictive efficiency of the model was evaluated with AUC and verified by calibration curve. The decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to evaluate the clinical utility of the prediction model. RESULTS: A total of 116 patients were enrolled for analysis, of which 60 had favorable prognosis (GOS ≥ 3). Five predictors, including GCS (OR = 13.400, P < 0.001), absolute amplitude of MMN at Fz site (FzMMNA, OR = 1.855, P = 0.038), EEG background activity (OR = 4.309, P = 0.023), EEG reactivity (OR = 4.154, P = 0.030), and sleep spindles (OR = 4.316, P = 0.031), were selected in the model by LASSO and binary logistic regression analysis. This model showed favorable predictive power, with an AUC of 0.939 (95% CI: 0.899–0.979), and calibration. The threshold probability of net benefit was between 5% and 92% in the DCA. CONCLUSION: This predictive model for consciousness recovery in patients with acute brain injury is based on a nomogram incorporating GCS, EEG background activity, EEG reactivity, sleep spindles, and FzMMNA, which can be conveniently obtained during hospitalization. It provides a basis for care givers to make subsequent medical decisions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9945265
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99452652023-02-23 A predictive model for consciousness recovery of comatose patients after acute brain injury Zhou, Liang Chen, Yuanyi Liu, Ziyuan You, Jia Chen, Siming Liu, Ganzhi Yu, Yang Wang, Jian Chen, Xin Front Neurosci Neuroscience BACKGROUND: Predicting the consciousness recovery for comatose patients with acute brain injury is an important issue. Although some efforts have been made in the study of prognostic assessment methods, it is still unclear which factors can be used to establish model to directly predict the probability of consciousness recovery. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to establish a model using clinical and neuroelectrophysiological indicators to predict consciousness recovery of comatose patients after acute brain injury. METHODS: The clinical data of patients with acute brain injury admitted to the neurosurgical intensive care unit of Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from May 2019 to May 2022, who underwent electroencephalogram (EEG) and auditory mismatch negativity (MMN) examinations within 28 days after coma onset, were collected. The prognosis was assessed by Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) at 3 months after coma onset. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis was applied to select the most relevant predictors. We combined Glasgow coma scale (GCS), EEG, and absolute amplitude of MMN at Fz to develop a predictive model using binary logistic regression and then presented by a nomogram. The predictive efficiency of the model was evaluated with AUC and verified by calibration curve. The decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to evaluate the clinical utility of the prediction model. RESULTS: A total of 116 patients were enrolled for analysis, of which 60 had favorable prognosis (GOS ≥ 3). Five predictors, including GCS (OR = 13.400, P < 0.001), absolute amplitude of MMN at Fz site (FzMMNA, OR = 1.855, P = 0.038), EEG background activity (OR = 4.309, P = 0.023), EEG reactivity (OR = 4.154, P = 0.030), and sleep spindles (OR = 4.316, P = 0.031), were selected in the model by LASSO and binary logistic regression analysis. This model showed favorable predictive power, with an AUC of 0.939 (95% CI: 0.899–0.979), and calibration. The threshold probability of net benefit was between 5% and 92% in the DCA. CONCLUSION: This predictive model for consciousness recovery in patients with acute brain injury is based on a nomogram incorporating GCS, EEG background activity, EEG reactivity, sleep spindles, and FzMMNA, which can be conveniently obtained during hospitalization. It provides a basis for care givers to make subsequent medical decisions. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9945265/ /pubmed/36845443 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1088666 Text en Copyright © 2023 Zhou, Chen, Liu, You, Chen, Liu, Yu, Wang and Chen. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Zhou, Liang
Chen, Yuanyi
Liu, Ziyuan
You, Jia
Chen, Siming
Liu, Ganzhi
Yu, Yang
Wang, Jian
Chen, Xin
A predictive model for consciousness recovery of comatose patients after acute brain injury
title A predictive model for consciousness recovery of comatose patients after acute brain injury
title_full A predictive model for consciousness recovery of comatose patients after acute brain injury
title_fullStr A predictive model for consciousness recovery of comatose patients after acute brain injury
title_full_unstemmed A predictive model for consciousness recovery of comatose patients after acute brain injury
title_short A predictive model for consciousness recovery of comatose patients after acute brain injury
title_sort predictive model for consciousness recovery of comatose patients after acute brain injury
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9945265/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36845443
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1088666
work_keys_str_mv AT zhouliang apredictivemodelforconsciousnessrecoveryofcomatosepatientsafteracutebraininjury
AT chenyuanyi apredictivemodelforconsciousnessrecoveryofcomatosepatientsafteracutebraininjury
AT liuziyuan apredictivemodelforconsciousnessrecoveryofcomatosepatientsafteracutebraininjury
AT youjia apredictivemodelforconsciousnessrecoveryofcomatosepatientsafteracutebraininjury
AT chensiming apredictivemodelforconsciousnessrecoveryofcomatosepatientsafteracutebraininjury
AT liuganzhi apredictivemodelforconsciousnessrecoveryofcomatosepatientsafteracutebraininjury
AT yuyang apredictivemodelforconsciousnessrecoveryofcomatosepatientsafteracutebraininjury
AT wangjian apredictivemodelforconsciousnessrecoveryofcomatosepatientsafteracutebraininjury
AT chenxin apredictivemodelforconsciousnessrecoveryofcomatosepatientsafteracutebraininjury
AT zhouliang predictivemodelforconsciousnessrecoveryofcomatosepatientsafteracutebraininjury
AT chenyuanyi predictivemodelforconsciousnessrecoveryofcomatosepatientsafteracutebraininjury
AT liuziyuan predictivemodelforconsciousnessrecoveryofcomatosepatientsafteracutebraininjury
AT youjia predictivemodelforconsciousnessrecoveryofcomatosepatientsafteracutebraininjury
AT chensiming predictivemodelforconsciousnessrecoveryofcomatosepatientsafteracutebraininjury
AT liuganzhi predictivemodelforconsciousnessrecoveryofcomatosepatientsafteracutebraininjury
AT yuyang predictivemodelforconsciousnessrecoveryofcomatosepatientsafteracutebraininjury
AT wangjian predictivemodelforconsciousnessrecoveryofcomatosepatientsafteracutebraininjury
AT chenxin predictivemodelforconsciousnessrecoveryofcomatosepatientsafteracutebraininjury