Cargando…
A predictive model for consciousness recovery of comatose patients after acute brain injury
BACKGROUND: Predicting the consciousness recovery for comatose patients with acute brain injury is an important issue. Although some efforts have been made in the study of prognostic assessment methods, it is still unclear which factors can be used to establish model to directly predict the probabil...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9945265/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36845443 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1088666 |
_version_ | 1784892102963888128 |
---|---|
author | Zhou, Liang Chen, Yuanyi Liu, Ziyuan You, Jia Chen, Siming Liu, Ganzhi Yu, Yang Wang, Jian Chen, Xin |
author_facet | Zhou, Liang Chen, Yuanyi Liu, Ziyuan You, Jia Chen, Siming Liu, Ganzhi Yu, Yang Wang, Jian Chen, Xin |
author_sort | Zhou, Liang |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Predicting the consciousness recovery for comatose patients with acute brain injury is an important issue. Although some efforts have been made in the study of prognostic assessment methods, it is still unclear which factors can be used to establish model to directly predict the probability of consciousness recovery. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to establish a model using clinical and neuroelectrophysiological indicators to predict consciousness recovery of comatose patients after acute brain injury. METHODS: The clinical data of patients with acute brain injury admitted to the neurosurgical intensive care unit of Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from May 2019 to May 2022, who underwent electroencephalogram (EEG) and auditory mismatch negativity (MMN) examinations within 28 days after coma onset, were collected. The prognosis was assessed by Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) at 3 months after coma onset. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis was applied to select the most relevant predictors. We combined Glasgow coma scale (GCS), EEG, and absolute amplitude of MMN at Fz to develop a predictive model using binary logistic regression and then presented by a nomogram. The predictive efficiency of the model was evaluated with AUC and verified by calibration curve. The decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to evaluate the clinical utility of the prediction model. RESULTS: A total of 116 patients were enrolled for analysis, of which 60 had favorable prognosis (GOS ≥ 3). Five predictors, including GCS (OR = 13.400, P < 0.001), absolute amplitude of MMN at Fz site (FzMMNA, OR = 1.855, P = 0.038), EEG background activity (OR = 4.309, P = 0.023), EEG reactivity (OR = 4.154, P = 0.030), and sleep spindles (OR = 4.316, P = 0.031), were selected in the model by LASSO and binary logistic regression analysis. This model showed favorable predictive power, with an AUC of 0.939 (95% CI: 0.899–0.979), and calibration. The threshold probability of net benefit was between 5% and 92% in the DCA. CONCLUSION: This predictive model for consciousness recovery in patients with acute brain injury is based on a nomogram incorporating GCS, EEG background activity, EEG reactivity, sleep spindles, and FzMMNA, which can be conveniently obtained during hospitalization. It provides a basis for care givers to make subsequent medical decisions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9945265 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99452652023-02-23 A predictive model for consciousness recovery of comatose patients after acute brain injury Zhou, Liang Chen, Yuanyi Liu, Ziyuan You, Jia Chen, Siming Liu, Ganzhi Yu, Yang Wang, Jian Chen, Xin Front Neurosci Neuroscience BACKGROUND: Predicting the consciousness recovery for comatose patients with acute brain injury is an important issue. Although some efforts have been made in the study of prognostic assessment methods, it is still unclear which factors can be used to establish model to directly predict the probability of consciousness recovery. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to establish a model using clinical and neuroelectrophysiological indicators to predict consciousness recovery of comatose patients after acute brain injury. METHODS: The clinical data of patients with acute brain injury admitted to the neurosurgical intensive care unit of Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from May 2019 to May 2022, who underwent electroencephalogram (EEG) and auditory mismatch negativity (MMN) examinations within 28 days after coma onset, were collected. The prognosis was assessed by Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) at 3 months after coma onset. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis was applied to select the most relevant predictors. We combined Glasgow coma scale (GCS), EEG, and absolute amplitude of MMN at Fz to develop a predictive model using binary logistic regression and then presented by a nomogram. The predictive efficiency of the model was evaluated with AUC and verified by calibration curve. The decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to evaluate the clinical utility of the prediction model. RESULTS: A total of 116 patients were enrolled for analysis, of which 60 had favorable prognosis (GOS ≥ 3). Five predictors, including GCS (OR = 13.400, P < 0.001), absolute amplitude of MMN at Fz site (FzMMNA, OR = 1.855, P = 0.038), EEG background activity (OR = 4.309, P = 0.023), EEG reactivity (OR = 4.154, P = 0.030), and sleep spindles (OR = 4.316, P = 0.031), were selected in the model by LASSO and binary logistic regression analysis. This model showed favorable predictive power, with an AUC of 0.939 (95% CI: 0.899–0.979), and calibration. The threshold probability of net benefit was between 5% and 92% in the DCA. CONCLUSION: This predictive model for consciousness recovery in patients with acute brain injury is based on a nomogram incorporating GCS, EEG background activity, EEG reactivity, sleep spindles, and FzMMNA, which can be conveniently obtained during hospitalization. It provides a basis for care givers to make subsequent medical decisions. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9945265/ /pubmed/36845443 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1088666 Text en Copyright © 2023 Zhou, Chen, Liu, You, Chen, Liu, Yu, Wang and Chen. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Zhou, Liang Chen, Yuanyi Liu, Ziyuan You, Jia Chen, Siming Liu, Ganzhi Yu, Yang Wang, Jian Chen, Xin A predictive model for consciousness recovery of comatose patients after acute brain injury |
title | A predictive model for consciousness recovery of comatose patients after acute brain injury |
title_full | A predictive model for consciousness recovery of comatose patients after acute brain injury |
title_fullStr | A predictive model for consciousness recovery of comatose patients after acute brain injury |
title_full_unstemmed | A predictive model for consciousness recovery of comatose patients after acute brain injury |
title_short | A predictive model for consciousness recovery of comatose patients after acute brain injury |
title_sort | predictive model for consciousness recovery of comatose patients after acute brain injury |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9945265/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36845443 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1088666 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhouliang apredictivemodelforconsciousnessrecoveryofcomatosepatientsafteracutebraininjury AT chenyuanyi apredictivemodelforconsciousnessrecoveryofcomatosepatientsafteracutebraininjury AT liuziyuan apredictivemodelforconsciousnessrecoveryofcomatosepatientsafteracutebraininjury AT youjia apredictivemodelforconsciousnessrecoveryofcomatosepatientsafteracutebraininjury AT chensiming apredictivemodelforconsciousnessrecoveryofcomatosepatientsafteracutebraininjury AT liuganzhi apredictivemodelforconsciousnessrecoveryofcomatosepatientsafteracutebraininjury AT yuyang apredictivemodelforconsciousnessrecoveryofcomatosepatientsafteracutebraininjury AT wangjian apredictivemodelforconsciousnessrecoveryofcomatosepatientsafteracutebraininjury AT chenxin apredictivemodelforconsciousnessrecoveryofcomatosepatientsafteracutebraininjury AT zhouliang predictivemodelforconsciousnessrecoveryofcomatosepatientsafteracutebraininjury AT chenyuanyi predictivemodelforconsciousnessrecoveryofcomatosepatientsafteracutebraininjury AT liuziyuan predictivemodelforconsciousnessrecoveryofcomatosepatientsafteracutebraininjury AT youjia predictivemodelforconsciousnessrecoveryofcomatosepatientsafteracutebraininjury AT chensiming predictivemodelforconsciousnessrecoveryofcomatosepatientsafteracutebraininjury AT liuganzhi predictivemodelforconsciousnessrecoveryofcomatosepatientsafteracutebraininjury AT yuyang predictivemodelforconsciousnessrecoveryofcomatosepatientsafteracutebraininjury AT wangjian predictivemodelforconsciousnessrecoveryofcomatosepatientsafteracutebraininjury AT chenxin predictivemodelforconsciousnessrecoveryofcomatosepatientsafteracutebraininjury |