Cargando…

Association of clinical and genetic risk factors with management of dyslipidaemia: analysis of repeated cross-sectional studies in the general population of Lausanne, Switzerland

OBJECTIVES: To assess the importance of clinical and genetic factors in management of dyslipidaemia in the general population. DESIGN: Repeated cross-sectional studies (2003–2006; 2009–2012 and 2014–2017) from a population-based cohort. SETTING: Single centre in Lausanne, Switzerland. PARTICIPANTS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chekanova, Valeriya, Abolhassani, Nazanin, Vaucher, Julien, Marques-Vidal, Pedro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9945309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36810165
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065409
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: To assess the importance of clinical and genetic factors in management of dyslipidaemia in the general population. DESIGN: Repeated cross-sectional studies (2003–2006; 2009–2012 and 2014–2017) from a population-based cohort. SETTING: Single centre in Lausanne, Switzerland. PARTICIPANTS: 617 (42.6% women, mean±SD: 61.6±8.5 years), 844 (48.5% women, 64.5±8.8 years) and 798 (50.3% women, 68.1±9.2) participants of the baseline, first and second follow-ups receiving any type of lipid-lowering drug. Participants were excluded if they had missing information regarding lipid levels, covariates or genetic data. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Management of dyslipidaemia was assessed according to European or Swiss guidelines. Genetic risk scores (GRSs) for lipid levels were computed based on the existing literature. RESULTS: Prevalence of adequately controlled dyslipidaemia was 52%, 45% and 46% at baseline, first and second follow-ups, respectively. On multivariable analysis, when compared with intermediate or low-risk individuals, participants at very high cardiovascular risk had an OR for dyslipidaemia control of 0.11 (95% CI: 0.06 to 0.18), 0.12 (0.08 to 0.19) and 0.38 (0.25 to 0.59) at baseline, first and second follow-ups, respectively. Use of newer generation or higher potency statins was associated with better control: OR of 1.90 (1.18 to 3.05) and 3.62 (1.65 to 7.92) for second and third generations compared with first in the first follow-up, with the corresponding values in the second follow-up being 1.90 (1.08 to 3.36) and 2.18 (1.05 to 4.51). No differences in GRSs were found between controlled and inadequately controlled subjects. Similar findings were obtained using Swiss guidelines. CONCLUSION: Management of dyslipidaemia is suboptimal in Switzerland. The effectiveness of high potency statins is hampered by low posology. The use of GRSs in the management of dyslipidaemia is not recommended.