Cargando…

Effect of systemic antiresorptive medication on the histopathological parameters of implant osseointegration in an in vivo rodent study

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the osseointegration of zirconia and titanium implants in the rat maxilla in specimens under systemic antiresorptive therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After 4 weeks of systematic medication administration (either zoledronic acid or alendronic acid)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kniha, Kristian, Hermanns-Sachweh, Benita, Möhlhenrich, Stephan Christian, Peters, Florian, Heitzer, Marius, Winnand, Philipp, Hölzle, Frank, Modabber, Ali
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9945384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36810006
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02763-z
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the osseointegration of zirconia and titanium implants in the rat maxilla in specimens under systemic antiresorptive therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After 4 weeks of systematic medication administration (either zoledronic acid or alendronic acid), 54 rats received one zirconia and one titanium implants that were immediately inserted in the rat maxilla after tooth extraction. Twelve weeks after implant placement, histopathological samples were evaluated for implant osteointegration parameters. RESULTS: The bone-implant-contact (BIC) ratio revealed no significant inter-group or inter-material differences. The distance between the implant shoulder to the bone level was significantly greater around the titanium implants of the zoledronic acid group compared to the zirconia implants of the control group (p = 0.0005). On average, signs of new bone formation could be detected in all groups, although often without statistical differences. Signs of bone necrosis were only detected around the zirconia implants of the control group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: At the 3-month follow-up, no implant material was demonstrably better than the others in terms of osseointegration metrics under systemic antiresorptive therapy. Further studies are necessary to determine whether there are differences in the osseointegration behavior of the different materials.