Cargando…

A bibliometric review of coach leadership studies

This study examined published articles concerning sports leadership within the sport psychology domain over the last 30 years using bibliometric analysis that centered on the written content of the publications as unit of analysis in order to explore the intellectual base, particularly the structura...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cruz, Angelita Bautista, Kim, Hyun-Duck
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9945541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36844359
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1135243
_version_ 1784892161520566272
author Cruz, Angelita Bautista
Kim, Hyun-Duck
author_facet Cruz, Angelita Bautista
Kim, Hyun-Duck
author_sort Cruz, Angelita Bautista
collection PubMed
description This study examined published articles concerning sports leadership within the sport psychology domain over the last 30 years using bibliometric analysis that centered on the written content of the publications as unit of analysis in order to explore the intellectual base, particularly the structural relationships among relevant research components about coach leadership. Leximancer version 5.0 (Leximancer Pty Ltd.) was used to extract data from 100 sports leadership-related articles from four sport psychology journals. Overall, the most relevant concepts generated were coaches (100%) and athletes (59%), followed by study, sport, support, and motivation, and behaviors. Also, relevant concepts produced for each journal were quite similar which included coaches, athletes, behaviors, study, support and team. Further, publications related to coach leadership have shown a steady growth rate since 1990 with 76% of all published articles were conducted via quantitative research method. Finally, United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Belgium were the top countries involved in the area of coach leadership. Coach leadership studies generally focus on behaviors and perceptions related to the coach and relationships between leadership and psychological outcomes. Each journal has a similar but distinct rationale when publishing papers about coach leadership. Bibliometric analysis can be applied as an alternative methodology to summarize large volumes of relevant data in order to map the current knowledge as well as identify potential future research directions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9945541
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99455412023-02-23 A bibliometric review of coach leadership studies Cruz, Angelita Bautista Kim, Hyun-Duck Front Psychol Psychology This study examined published articles concerning sports leadership within the sport psychology domain over the last 30 years using bibliometric analysis that centered on the written content of the publications as unit of analysis in order to explore the intellectual base, particularly the structural relationships among relevant research components about coach leadership. Leximancer version 5.0 (Leximancer Pty Ltd.) was used to extract data from 100 sports leadership-related articles from four sport psychology journals. Overall, the most relevant concepts generated were coaches (100%) and athletes (59%), followed by study, sport, support, and motivation, and behaviors. Also, relevant concepts produced for each journal were quite similar which included coaches, athletes, behaviors, study, support and team. Further, publications related to coach leadership have shown a steady growth rate since 1990 with 76% of all published articles were conducted via quantitative research method. Finally, United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Belgium were the top countries involved in the area of coach leadership. Coach leadership studies generally focus on behaviors and perceptions related to the coach and relationships between leadership and psychological outcomes. Each journal has a similar but distinct rationale when publishing papers about coach leadership. Bibliometric analysis can be applied as an alternative methodology to summarize large volumes of relevant data in order to map the current knowledge as well as identify potential future research directions. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9945541/ /pubmed/36844359 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1135243 Text en Copyright © 2023 Cruz and Kim. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Cruz, Angelita Bautista
Kim, Hyun-Duck
A bibliometric review of coach leadership studies
title A bibliometric review of coach leadership studies
title_full A bibliometric review of coach leadership studies
title_fullStr A bibliometric review of coach leadership studies
title_full_unstemmed A bibliometric review of coach leadership studies
title_short A bibliometric review of coach leadership studies
title_sort bibliometric review of coach leadership studies
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9945541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36844359
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1135243
work_keys_str_mv AT cruzangelitabautista abibliometricreviewofcoachleadershipstudies
AT kimhyunduck abibliometricreviewofcoachleadershipstudies
AT cruzangelitabautista bibliometricreviewofcoachleadershipstudies
AT kimhyunduck bibliometricreviewofcoachleadershipstudies