Cargando…
A bibliometric review of coach leadership studies
This study examined published articles concerning sports leadership within the sport psychology domain over the last 30 years using bibliometric analysis that centered on the written content of the publications as unit of analysis in order to explore the intellectual base, particularly the structura...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9945541/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36844359 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1135243 |
_version_ | 1784892161520566272 |
---|---|
author | Cruz, Angelita Bautista Kim, Hyun-Duck |
author_facet | Cruz, Angelita Bautista Kim, Hyun-Duck |
author_sort | Cruz, Angelita Bautista |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study examined published articles concerning sports leadership within the sport psychology domain over the last 30 years using bibliometric analysis that centered on the written content of the publications as unit of analysis in order to explore the intellectual base, particularly the structural relationships among relevant research components about coach leadership. Leximancer version 5.0 (Leximancer Pty Ltd.) was used to extract data from 100 sports leadership-related articles from four sport psychology journals. Overall, the most relevant concepts generated were coaches (100%) and athletes (59%), followed by study, sport, support, and motivation, and behaviors. Also, relevant concepts produced for each journal were quite similar which included coaches, athletes, behaviors, study, support and team. Further, publications related to coach leadership have shown a steady growth rate since 1990 with 76% of all published articles were conducted via quantitative research method. Finally, United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Belgium were the top countries involved in the area of coach leadership. Coach leadership studies generally focus on behaviors and perceptions related to the coach and relationships between leadership and psychological outcomes. Each journal has a similar but distinct rationale when publishing papers about coach leadership. Bibliometric analysis can be applied as an alternative methodology to summarize large volumes of relevant data in order to map the current knowledge as well as identify potential future research directions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9945541 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99455412023-02-23 A bibliometric review of coach leadership studies Cruz, Angelita Bautista Kim, Hyun-Duck Front Psychol Psychology This study examined published articles concerning sports leadership within the sport psychology domain over the last 30 years using bibliometric analysis that centered on the written content of the publications as unit of analysis in order to explore the intellectual base, particularly the structural relationships among relevant research components about coach leadership. Leximancer version 5.0 (Leximancer Pty Ltd.) was used to extract data from 100 sports leadership-related articles from four sport psychology journals. Overall, the most relevant concepts generated were coaches (100%) and athletes (59%), followed by study, sport, support, and motivation, and behaviors. Also, relevant concepts produced for each journal were quite similar which included coaches, athletes, behaviors, study, support and team. Further, publications related to coach leadership have shown a steady growth rate since 1990 with 76% of all published articles were conducted via quantitative research method. Finally, United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Belgium were the top countries involved in the area of coach leadership. Coach leadership studies generally focus on behaviors and perceptions related to the coach and relationships between leadership and psychological outcomes. Each journal has a similar but distinct rationale when publishing papers about coach leadership. Bibliometric analysis can be applied as an alternative methodology to summarize large volumes of relevant data in order to map the current knowledge as well as identify potential future research directions. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9945541/ /pubmed/36844359 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1135243 Text en Copyright © 2023 Cruz and Kim. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Cruz, Angelita Bautista Kim, Hyun-Duck A bibliometric review of coach leadership studies |
title | A bibliometric review of coach leadership studies |
title_full | A bibliometric review of coach leadership studies |
title_fullStr | A bibliometric review of coach leadership studies |
title_full_unstemmed | A bibliometric review of coach leadership studies |
title_short | A bibliometric review of coach leadership studies |
title_sort | bibliometric review of coach leadership studies |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9945541/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36844359 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1135243 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cruzangelitabautista abibliometricreviewofcoachleadershipstudies AT kimhyunduck abibliometricreviewofcoachleadershipstudies AT cruzangelitabautista bibliometricreviewofcoachleadershipstudies AT kimhyunduck bibliometricreviewofcoachleadershipstudies |