Cargando…
Mechanical testing of transtibial prosthetic sockets: A discussion paper from the American Orthotic and Prosthetic Association Socket Guidance Workgroup
The advent of novel manufacturing technologies, materials, and socket design concepts could introduce risks to prosthetic limb users, as the existing knowledge base for safe fabrication may not apply. Moreover, although structural test standards exist for mass-produced prosthetic components, they ar...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9945567/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36763513 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PXR.0000000000000222 |
_version_ | 1784892166723600384 |
---|---|
author | Gariboldi, Francesca Cutti, Andrea Giovanni Fatone, Stefania Nickel, Eric Dickinson, Alex Steer, Joshua Erenstone, Jeffrey Zahedi, Saeed |
author_facet | Gariboldi, Francesca Cutti, Andrea Giovanni Fatone, Stefania Nickel, Eric Dickinson, Alex Steer, Joshua Erenstone, Jeffrey Zahedi, Saeed |
author_sort | Gariboldi, Francesca |
collection | PubMed |
description | The advent of novel manufacturing technologies, materials, and socket design concepts could introduce risks to prosthetic limb users, as the existing knowledge base for safe fabrication may not apply. Moreover, although structural test standards exist for mass-produced prosthetic components, they are not applicable to prosthetic sockets. METHODS: The “AOPA Socket Guidance Workgroup” was formed in 2020 to provide the prosthetic community with evidence-based clinical best practices and methods in the field of prosthetic socket structural analysis. This multidisciplinary expert workgroup undertook a critical analysis of the knowledge gaps regarding the requirements for mechanical testing of lower limb prosthetic sockets. RESULTS: The Workgroup identified knowledge gaps in 4 domains. Domain 1 describes the shape and composition of a mock residual limb, required to support and generate in vivo representative loading within the socket. Domain 2 concerns prosthetic socket coordinate systems and alignment. Domain 3 regards the components and requirements of test specimens. Finally, Domain 4 considers test conditions, loading parameters, and acceptance criteria. CONCLUSIONS: This paper describes these knowledge gaps in detail and recommends potential solution approaches based on literature review, group consensus around existing knowledge, or the formation of new study groups to fill each knowledge gap. Our intent is for the recommendations arising from this paper to support the community (e.g., researchers in the clinic, academia, industry, and funders) in addressing these knowledge gaps. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9945567 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99455672023-02-23 Mechanical testing of transtibial prosthetic sockets: A discussion paper from the American Orthotic and Prosthetic Association Socket Guidance Workgroup Gariboldi, Francesca Cutti, Andrea Giovanni Fatone, Stefania Nickel, Eric Dickinson, Alex Steer, Joshua Erenstone, Jeffrey Zahedi, Saeed Prosthet Orthot Int Expert Clinical View Point The advent of novel manufacturing technologies, materials, and socket design concepts could introduce risks to prosthetic limb users, as the existing knowledge base for safe fabrication may not apply. Moreover, although structural test standards exist for mass-produced prosthetic components, they are not applicable to prosthetic sockets. METHODS: The “AOPA Socket Guidance Workgroup” was formed in 2020 to provide the prosthetic community with evidence-based clinical best practices and methods in the field of prosthetic socket structural analysis. This multidisciplinary expert workgroup undertook a critical analysis of the knowledge gaps regarding the requirements for mechanical testing of lower limb prosthetic sockets. RESULTS: The Workgroup identified knowledge gaps in 4 domains. Domain 1 describes the shape and composition of a mock residual limb, required to support and generate in vivo representative loading within the socket. Domain 2 concerns prosthetic socket coordinate systems and alignment. Domain 3 regards the components and requirements of test specimens. Finally, Domain 4 considers test conditions, loading parameters, and acceptance criteria. CONCLUSIONS: This paper describes these knowledge gaps in detail and recommends potential solution approaches based on literature review, group consensus around existing knowledge, or the formation of new study groups to fill each knowledge gap. Our intent is for the recommendations arising from this paper to support the community (e.g., researchers in the clinic, academia, industry, and funders) in addressing these knowledge gaps. Wolters Kluwer 2023-02 2023-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9945567/ /pubmed/36763513 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PXR.0000000000000222 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer incorporated on behalf of The International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Expert Clinical View Point Gariboldi, Francesca Cutti, Andrea Giovanni Fatone, Stefania Nickel, Eric Dickinson, Alex Steer, Joshua Erenstone, Jeffrey Zahedi, Saeed Mechanical testing of transtibial prosthetic sockets: A discussion paper from the American Orthotic and Prosthetic Association Socket Guidance Workgroup |
title | Mechanical testing of transtibial prosthetic sockets: A discussion paper from the American Orthotic and Prosthetic Association Socket Guidance Workgroup |
title_full | Mechanical testing of transtibial prosthetic sockets: A discussion paper from the American Orthotic and Prosthetic Association Socket Guidance Workgroup |
title_fullStr | Mechanical testing of transtibial prosthetic sockets: A discussion paper from the American Orthotic and Prosthetic Association Socket Guidance Workgroup |
title_full_unstemmed | Mechanical testing of transtibial prosthetic sockets: A discussion paper from the American Orthotic and Prosthetic Association Socket Guidance Workgroup |
title_short | Mechanical testing of transtibial prosthetic sockets: A discussion paper from the American Orthotic and Prosthetic Association Socket Guidance Workgroup |
title_sort | mechanical testing of transtibial prosthetic sockets: a discussion paper from the american orthotic and prosthetic association socket guidance workgroup |
topic | Expert Clinical View Point |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9945567/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36763513 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PXR.0000000000000222 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gariboldifrancesca mechanicaltestingoftranstibialprostheticsocketsadiscussionpaperfromtheamericanorthoticandprostheticassociationsocketguidanceworkgroup AT cuttiandreagiovanni mechanicaltestingoftranstibialprostheticsocketsadiscussionpaperfromtheamericanorthoticandprostheticassociationsocketguidanceworkgroup AT fatonestefania mechanicaltestingoftranstibialprostheticsocketsadiscussionpaperfromtheamericanorthoticandprostheticassociationsocketguidanceworkgroup AT nickeleric mechanicaltestingoftranstibialprostheticsocketsadiscussionpaperfromtheamericanorthoticandprostheticassociationsocketguidanceworkgroup AT dickinsonalex mechanicaltestingoftranstibialprostheticsocketsadiscussionpaperfromtheamericanorthoticandprostheticassociationsocketguidanceworkgroup AT steerjoshua mechanicaltestingoftranstibialprostheticsocketsadiscussionpaperfromtheamericanorthoticandprostheticassociationsocketguidanceworkgroup AT erenstonejeffrey mechanicaltestingoftranstibialprostheticsocketsadiscussionpaperfromtheamericanorthoticandprostheticassociationsocketguidanceworkgroup AT zahedisaeed mechanicaltestingoftranstibialprostheticsocketsadiscussionpaperfromtheamericanorthoticandprostheticassociationsocketguidanceworkgroup |