Cargando…

Mechanical testing of transtibial prosthetic sockets: A discussion paper from the American Orthotic and Prosthetic Association Socket Guidance Workgroup

The advent of novel manufacturing technologies, materials, and socket design concepts could introduce risks to prosthetic limb users, as the existing knowledge base for safe fabrication may not apply. Moreover, although structural test standards exist for mass-produced prosthetic components, they ar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gariboldi, Francesca, Cutti, Andrea Giovanni, Fatone, Stefania, Nickel, Eric, Dickinson, Alex, Steer, Joshua, Erenstone, Jeffrey, Zahedi, Saeed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9945567/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36763513
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PXR.0000000000000222
_version_ 1784892166723600384
author Gariboldi, Francesca
Cutti, Andrea Giovanni
Fatone, Stefania
Nickel, Eric
Dickinson, Alex
Steer, Joshua
Erenstone, Jeffrey
Zahedi, Saeed
author_facet Gariboldi, Francesca
Cutti, Andrea Giovanni
Fatone, Stefania
Nickel, Eric
Dickinson, Alex
Steer, Joshua
Erenstone, Jeffrey
Zahedi, Saeed
author_sort Gariboldi, Francesca
collection PubMed
description The advent of novel manufacturing technologies, materials, and socket design concepts could introduce risks to prosthetic limb users, as the existing knowledge base for safe fabrication may not apply. Moreover, although structural test standards exist for mass-produced prosthetic components, they are not applicable to prosthetic sockets. METHODS: The “AOPA Socket Guidance Workgroup” was formed in 2020 to provide the prosthetic community with evidence-based clinical best practices and methods in the field of prosthetic socket structural analysis. This multidisciplinary expert workgroup undertook a critical analysis of the knowledge gaps regarding the requirements for mechanical testing of lower limb prosthetic sockets. RESULTS: The Workgroup identified knowledge gaps in 4 domains. Domain 1 describes the shape and composition of a mock residual limb, required to support and generate in vivo representative loading within the socket. Domain 2 concerns prosthetic socket coordinate systems and alignment. Domain 3 regards the components and requirements of test specimens. Finally, Domain 4 considers test conditions, loading parameters, and acceptance criteria. CONCLUSIONS: This paper describes these knowledge gaps in detail and recommends potential solution approaches based on literature review, group consensus around existing knowledge, or the formation of new study groups to fill each knowledge gap. Our intent is for the recommendations arising from this paper to support the community (e.g., researchers in the clinic, academia, industry, and funders) in addressing these knowledge gaps.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9945567
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99455672023-02-23 Mechanical testing of transtibial prosthetic sockets: A discussion paper from the American Orthotic and Prosthetic Association Socket Guidance Workgroup Gariboldi, Francesca Cutti, Andrea Giovanni Fatone, Stefania Nickel, Eric Dickinson, Alex Steer, Joshua Erenstone, Jeffrey Zahedi, Saeed Prosthet Orthot Int Expert Clinical View Point The advent of novel manufacturing technologies, materials, and socket design concepts could introduce risks to prosthetic limb users, as the existing knowledge base for safe fabrication may not apply. Moreover, although structural test standards exist for mass-produced prosthetic components, they are not applicable to prosthetic sockets. METHODS: The “AOPA Socket Guidance Workgroup” was formed in 2020 to provide the prosthetic community with evidence-based clinical best practices and methods in the field of prosthetic socket structural analysis. This multidisciplinary expert workgroup undertook a critical analysis of the knowledge gaps regarding the requirements for mechanical testing of lower limb prosthetic sockets. RESULTS: The Workgroup identified knowledge gaps in 4 domains. Domain 1 describes the shape and composition of a mock residual limb, required to support and generate in vivo representative loading within the socket. Domain 2 concerns prosthetic socket coordinate systems and alignment. Domain 3 regards the components and requirements of test specimens. Finally, Domain 4 considers test conditions, loading parameters, and acceptance criteria. CONCLUSIONS: This paper describes these knowledge gaps in detail and recommends potential solution approaches based on literature review, group consensus around existing knowledge, or the formation of new study groups to fill each knowledge gap. Our intent is for the recommendations arising from this paper to support the community (e.g., researchers in the clinic, academia, industry, and funders) in addressing these knowledge gaps. Wolters Kluwer 2023-02 2023-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9945567/ /pubmed/36763513 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PXR.0000000000000222 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer incorporated on behalf of The International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Expert Clinical View Point
Gariboldi, Francesca
Cutti, Andrea Giovanni
Fatone, Stefania
Nickel, Eric
Dickinson, Alex
Steer, Joshua
Erenstone, Jeffrey
Zahedi, Saeed
Mechanical testing of transtibial prosthetic sockets: A discussion paper from the American Orthotic and Prosthetic Association Socket Guidance Workgroup
title Mechanical testing of transtibial prosthetic sockets: A discussion paper from the American Orthotic and Prosthetic Association Socket Guidance Workgroup
title_full Mechanical testing of transtibial prosthetic sockets: A discussion paper from the American Orthotic and Prosthetic Association Socket Guidance Workgroup
title_fullStr Mechanical testing of transtibial prosthetic sockets: A discussion paper from the American Orthotic and Prosthetic Association Socket Guidance Workgroup
title_full_unstemmed Mechanical testing of transtibial prosthetic sockets: A discussion paper from the American Orthotic and Prosthetic Association Socket Guidance Workgroup
title_short Mechanical testing of transtibial prosthetic sockets: A discussion paper from the American Orthotic and Prosthetic Association Socket Guidance Workgroup
title_sort mechanical testing of transtibial prosthetic sockets: a discussion paper from the american orthotic and prosthetic association socket guidance workgroup
topic Expert Clinical View Point
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9945567/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36763513
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PXR.0000000000000222
work_keys_str_mv AT gariboldifrancesca mechanicaltestingoftranstibialprostheticsocketsadiscussionpaperfromtheamericanorthoticandprostheticassociationsocketguidanceworkgroup
AT cuttiandreagiovanni mechanicaltestingoftranstibialprostheticsocketsadiscussionpaperfromtheamericanorthoticandprostheticassociationsocketguidanceworkgroup
AT fatonestefania mechanicaltestingoftranstibialprostheticsocketsadiscussionpaperfromtheamericanorthoticandprostheticassociationsocketguidanceworkgroup
AT nickeleric mechanicaltestingoftranstibialprostheticsocketsadiscussionpaperfromtheamericanorthoticandprostheticassociationsocketguidanceworkgroup
AT dickinsonalex mechanicaltestingoftranstibialprostheticsocketsadiscussionpaperfromtheamericanorthoticandprostheticassociationsocketguidanceworkgroup
AT steerjoshua mechanicaltestingoftranstibialprostheticsocketsadiscussionpaperfromtheamericanorthoticandprostheticassociationsocketguidanceworkgroup
AT erenstonejeffrey mechanicaltestingoftranstibialprostheticsocketsadiscussionpaperfromtheamericanorthoticandprostheticassociationsocketguidanceworkgroup
AT zahedisaeed mechanicaltestingoftranstibialprostheticsocketsadiscussionpaperfromtheamericanorthoticandprostheticassociationsocketguidanceworkgroup