Cargando…
The use of deformation imaging in the assessment of patients pre and post transcatheter aortic valve implantation
BACKGROUND: Deformation imaging represents a method of measuring myocardial function, including global longitudinal strain (GLS), peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) and radial strain. This study aimed to assess subclinical improvements in left ventricular function in patients undergoing transcat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9945603/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36810286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s44156-023-00017-w |
_version_ | 1784892172799049728 |
---|---|
author | Coyle, Mark King, Gerard Bennett, Kathleen Maree, Andrew Hensey, Mark O’Connor, Stephen Daly, Caroline Murphy, Gregory Murphy, Ross T. |
author_facet | Coyle, Mark King, Gerard Bennett, Kathleen Maree, Andrew Hensey, Mark O’Connor, Stephen Daly, Caroline Murphy, Gregory Murphy, Ross T. |
author_sort | Coyle, Mark |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Deformation imaging represents a method of measuring myocardial function, including global longitudinal strain (GLS), peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) and radial strain. This study aimed to assess subclinical improvements in left ventricular function in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) by comparing GLS, PALS and radial strain pre and post procedure. METHODS: We conducted a single site prospective observational study of 25 patients undergoing TAVI, comparing baseline and post-TAVI echocardiograms. Individual participants were assessed for differences in GLS, PALS and radial strain in addition to changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (%). RESULTS: Our results revealed a significant improvement in GLS (mean change pre-post of 2.14% [95% CI 1.08, 3.20] p = 0.0003) with no significant change in LVEF (0.96% [95% CI − 2.30, 4.22], p = 0.55). There was a statistically significant improvement in radial strain pre and post TAVI (mean 9.68% [95% CI 3.10, 16.25] p = 0.0058). There was positive trend towards improvements in PALS pre and post TAVI (mean change of 2.30% [95% CI − 0.19, 4.80] p = 0.068). CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing TAVI, measuring GLS and radial strain provided statistically significant information regarding subclinical improvements in LV function, which may have prognostic implications. The incorporation of deformation imaging in addition to standard echocardiographic measurements may have an important role in guiding future management in patients undergoing TAVI and assessing response. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9945603 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99456032023-02-23 The use of deformation imaging in the assessment of patients pre and post transcatheter aortic valve implantation Coyle, Mark King, Gerard Bennett, Kathleen Maree, Andrew Hensey, Mark O’Connor, Stephen Daly, Caroline Murphy, Gregory Murphy, Ross T. Echo Res Pract Research BACKGROUND: Deformation imaging represents a method of measuring myocardial function, including global longitudinal strain (GLS), peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) and radial strain. This study aimed to assess subclinical improvements in left ventricular function in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) by comparing GLS, PALS and radial strain pre and post procedure. METHODS: We conducted a single site prospective observational study of 25 patients undergoing TAVI, comparing baseline and post-TAVI echocardiograms. Individual participants were assessed for differences in GLS, PALS and radial strain in addition to changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (%). RESULTS: Our results revealed a significant improvement in GLS (mean change pre-post of 2.14% [95% CI 1.08, 3.20] p = 0.0003) with no significant change in LVEF (0.96% [95% CI − 2.30, 4.22], p = 0.55). There was a statistically significant improvement in radial strain pre and post TAVI (mean 9.68% [95% CI 3.10, 16.25] p = 0.0058). There was positive trend towards improvements in PALS pre and post TAVI (mean change of 2.30% [95% CI − 0.19, 4.80] p = 0.068). CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing TAVI, measuring GLS and radial strain provided statistically significant information regarding subclinical improvements in LV function, which may have prognostic implications. The incorporation of deformation imaging in addition to standard echocardiographic measurements may have an important role in guiding future management in patients undergoing TAVI and assessing response. BioMed Central 2023-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9945603/ /pubmed/36810286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s44156-023-00017-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Coyle, Mark King, Gerard Bennett, Kathleen Maree, Andrew Hensey, Mark O’Connor, Stephen Daly, Caroline Murphy, Gregory Murphy, Ross T. The use of deformation imaging in the assessment of patients pre and post transcatheter aortic valve implantation |
title | The use of deformation imaging in the assessment of patients pre and post transcatheter aortic valve implantation |
title_full | The use of deformation imaging in the assessment of patients pre and post transcatheter aortic valve implantation |
title_fullStr | The use of deformation imaging in the assessment of patients pre and post transcatheter aortic valve implantation |
title_full_unstemmed | The use of deformation imaging in the assessment of patients pre and post transcatheter aortic valve implantation |
title_short | The use of deformation imaging in the assessment of patients pre and post transcatheter aortic valve implantation |
title_sort | use of deformation imaging in the assessment of patients pre and post transcatheter aortic valve implantation |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9945603/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36810286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s44156-023-00017-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT coylemark theuseofdeformationimagingintheassessmentofpatientspreandposttranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation AT kinggerard theuseofdeformationimagingintheassessmentofpatientspreandposttranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation AT bennettkathleen theuseofdeformationimagingintheassessmentofpatientspreandposttranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation AT mareeandrew theuseofdeformationimagingintheassessmentofpatientspreandposttranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation AT henseymark theuseofdeformationimagingintheassessmentofpatientspreandposttranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation AT oconnorstephen theuseofdeformationimagingintheassessmentofpatientspreandposttranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation AT dalycaroline theuseofdeformationimagingintheassessmentofpatientspreandposttranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation AT murphygregory theuseofdeformationimagingintheassessmentofpatientspreandposttranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation AT murphyrosst theuseofdeformationimagingintheassessmentofpatientspreandposttranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation AT coylemark useofdeformationimagingintheassessmentofpatientspreandposttranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation AT kinggerard useofdeformationimagingintheassessmentofpatientspreandposttranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation AT bennettkathleen useofdeformationimagingintheassessmentofpatientspreandposttranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation AT mareeandrew useofdeformationimagingintheassessmentofpatientspreandposttranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation AT henseymark useofdeformationimagingintheassessmentofpatientspreandposttranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation AT oconnorstephen useofdeformationimagingintheassessmentofpatientspreandposttranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation AT dalycaroline useofdeformationimagingintheassessmentofpatientspreandposttranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation AT murphygregory useofdeformationimagingintheassessmentofpatientspreandposttranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation AT murphyrosst useofdeformationimagingintheassessmentofpatientspreandposttranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation |