Cargando…

The use of deformation imaging in the assessment of patients pre and post transcatheter aortic valve implantation

BACKGROUND: Deformation imaging represents a method of measuring myocardial function, including global longitudinal strain (GLS), peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) and radial strain. This study aimed to assess subclinical improvements in left ventricular function in patients undergoing transcat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coyle, Mark, King, Gerard, Bennett, Kathleen, Maree, Andrew, Hensey, Mark, O’Connor, Stephen, Daly, Caroline, Murphy, Gregory, Murphy, Ross T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9945603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36810286
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s44156-023-00017-w
_version_ 1784892172799049728
author Coyle, Mark
King, Gerard
Bennett, Kathleen
Maree, Andrew
Hensey, Mark
O’Connor, Stephen
Daly, Caroline
Murphy, Gregory
Murphy, Ross T.
author_facet Coyle, Mark
King, Gerard
Bennett, Kathleen
Maree, Andrew
Hensey, Mark
O’Connor, Stephen
Daly, Caroline
Murphy, Gregory
Murphy, Ross T.
author_sort Coyle, Mark
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Deformation imaging represents a method of measuring myocardial function, including global longitudinal strain (GLS), peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) and radial strain. This study aimed to assess subclinical improvements in left ventricular function in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) by comparing GLS, PALS and radial strain pre and post procedure. METHODS: We conducted a single site prospective observational study of 25 patients undergoing TAVI, comparing baseline and post-TAVI echocardiograms. Individual participants were assessed for differences in GLS, PALS and radial strain in addition to changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (%). RESULTS: Our results revealed a significant improvement in GLS (mean change pre-post of 2.14% [95% CI 1.08, 3.20] p = 0.0003) with no significant change in LVEF (0.96% [95% CI − 2.30, 4.22], p = 0.55). There was a statistically significant improvement in radial strain pre and post TAVI (mean 9.68% [95% CI 3.10, 16.25] p = 0.0058). There was positive trend towards improvements in PALS pre and post TAVI (mean change of 2.30% [95% CI − 0.19, 4.80] p = 0.068). CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing TAVI, measuring GLS and radial strain provided statistically significant information regarding subclinical improvements in LV function, which may have prognostic implications. The incorporation of deformation imaging in addition to standard echocardiographic measurements may have an important role in guiding future management in patients undergoing TAVI and assessing response.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9945603
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99456032023-02-23 The use of deformation imaging in the assessment of patients pre and post transcatheter aortic valve implantation Coyle, Mark King, Gerard Bennett, Kathleen Maree, Andrew Hensey, Mark O’Connor, Stephen Daly, Caroline Murphy, Gregory Murphy, Ross T. Echo Res Pract Research BACKGROUND: Deformation imaging represents a method of measuring myocardial function, including global longitudinal strain (GLS), peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) and radial strain. This study aimed to assess subclinical improvements in left ventricular function in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) by comparing GLS, PALS and radial strain pre and post procedure. METHODS: We conducted a single site prospective observational study of 25 patients undergoing TAVI, comparing baseline and post-TAVI echocardiograms. Individual participants were assessed for differences in GLS, PALS and radial strain in addition to changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (%). RESULTS: Our results revealed a significant improvement in GLS (mean change pre-post of 2.14% [95% CI 1.08, 3.20] p = 0.0003) with no significant change in LVEF (0.96% [95% CI − 2.30, 4.22], p = 0.55). There was a statistically significant improvement in radial strain pre and post TAVI (mean 9.68% [95% CI 3.10, 16.25] p = 0.0058). There was positive trend towards improvements in PALS pre and post TAVI (mean change of 2.30% [95% CI − 0.19, 4.80] p = 0.068). CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing TAVI, measuring GLS and radial strain provided statistically significant information regarding subclinical improvements in LV function, which may have prognostic implications. The incorporation of deformation imaging in addition to standard echocardiographic measurements may have an important role in guiding future management in patients undergoing TAVI and assessing response. BioMed Central 2023-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9945603/ /pubmed/36810286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s44156-023-00017-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Coyle, Mark
King, Gerard
Bennett, Kathleen
Maree, Andrew
Hensey, Mark
O’Connor, Stephen
Daly, Caroline
Murphy, Gregory
Murphy, Ross T.
The use of deformation imaging in the assessment of patients pre and post transcatheter aortic valve implantation
title The use of deformation imaging in the assessment of patients pre and post transcatheter aortic valve implantation
title_full The use of deformation imaging in the assessment of patients pre and post transcatheter aortic valve implantation
title_fullStr The use of deformation imaging in the assessment of patients pre and post transcatheter aortic valve implantation
title_full_unstemmed The use of deformation imaging in the assessment of patients pre and post transcatheter aortic valve implantation
title_short The use of deformation imaging in the assessment of patients pre and post transcatheter aortic valve implantation
title_sort use of deformation imaging in the assessment of patients pre and post transcatheter aortic valve implantation
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9945603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36810286
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s44156-023-00017-w
work_keys_str_mv AT coylemark theuseofdeformationimagingintheassessmentofpatientspreandposttranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT kinggerard theuseofdeformationimagingintheassessmentofpatientspreandposttranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT bennettkathleen theuseofdeformationimagingintheassessmentofpatientspreandposttranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT mareeandrew theuseofdeformationimagingintheassessmentofpatientspreandposttranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT henseymark theuseofdeformationimagingintheassessmentofpatientspreandposttranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT oconnorstephen theuseofdeformationimagingintheassessmentofpatientspreandposttranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT dalycaroline theuseofdeformationimagingintheassessmentofpatientspreandposttranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT murphygregory theuseofdeformationimagingintheassessmentofpatientspreandposttranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT murphyrosst theuseofdeformationimagingintheassessmentofpatientspreandposttranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT coylemark useofdeformationimagingintheassessmentofpatientspreandposttranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT kinggerard useofdeformationimagingintheassessmentofpatientspreandposttranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT bennettkathleen useofdeformationimagingintheassessmentofpatientspreandposttranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT mareeandrew useofdeformationimagingintheassessmentofpatientspreandposttranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT henseymark useofdeformationimagingintheassessmentofpatientspreandposttranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT oconnorstephen useofdeformationimagingintheassessmentofpatientspreandposttranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT dalycaroline useofdeformationimagingintheassessmentofpatientspreandposttranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT murphygregory useofdeformationimagingintheassessmentofpatientspreandposttranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT murphyrosst useofdeformationimagingintheassessmentofpatientspreandposttranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation