Cargando…

Postoperative radiotherapy for supraglottic cancer on real-world data: can we reduce dose to lymph node levels?

PURPOSE: To evaluate prognosis for reducing postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) dose to lymph node levels of supraglottic cancer (SC) on real-world data. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Patients were derived from two cancer centers. In center 1, the involved nodal levels (high-risk levels, HRL) and the next lev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Yi, Wei, Yumei, Wang, Jingbo, Zhang, Jianghu, Chen, Xuesong, Wu, Runye, Liu, Qingfeng, Qu, Yuan, Wang, Kai, Huang, Xiaodong, Luo, Jingwei, Xu, Wei, Zhang, Ye, Yi, Junlin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9945622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36814311
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-023-02228-1
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To evaluate prognosis for reducing postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) dose to lymph node levels of supraglottic cancer (SC) on real-world data. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Patients were derived from two cancer centers. In center 1, the involved nodal levels (high-risk levels, HRL) and the next level received a dose of 60.06 Gy/1.82 Gy per fraction, while the other uninvolved levels (low-risk levels, LRL) received 50.96 Gy/1.82 Gy per fraction. In center 2, all received 50 Gy/2 Gy per fraction. The rates of high-risk levels control (HRC), regional control (RC), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were calculated by Kaplan–Meier method. RESULT: Totally, 124 patients were included (62 in center 1, 62 in center 2). Most patients (106, 85.5%) had a stage T3/N + tumor. The median follow-up was 45 months (range 1–163 months). There were no significant differences in terms of OS (p = 0.126), RC (p = 0.514), PFS (p = 0.195) and DMFS (p = 0.834). Most regional recurrences (4, 80%) occurred within three years of treatment, and all occurred within the target volumes. No regional failure occurred in HRL in center 1, while three (3/4) failures occurred in center 2. Dose reduction prescription to HRL led to a lower HRC rate (100% vs. 90.6%, p = 0.009). While the rates of LRL control (98.4%) were equal between the two centers. CONCLUSION: Compared with a standard dose, the reduced dose to involved nodal levels showed inferior regional control for PORT, while uninvolved nodal levels showed equal outcomes. A dose of 50 Gy for HRL may be an unfavorable treatment option for SC.