Cargando…
Comparison of Physical Properties and Degradation of Polylactic Acid and Polypropylene Facemask Layer
The current 3-ply facemasks are produced mostly using polypropylene (PP) as the main plastic layer that is a non-biodegradable polymer. The objective of this study was to fabricate a polylactic acid (PLA) layer, a biodegradable polymer, using the electrospinning process. Comparison on the degradatio...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Fiber Society
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9945838/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12221-023-00051-9 |
_version_ | 1784892220755673088 |
---|---|
author | Fakhri, M. Amirul Mariatti, M. Vilay, V. Todo, M. |
author_facet | Fakhri, M. Amirul Mariatti, M. Vilay, V. Todo, M. |
author_sort | Fakhri, M. Amirul |
collection | PubMed |
description | The current 3-ply facemasks are produced mostly using polypropylene (PP) as the main plastic layer that is a non-biodegradable polymer. The objective of this study was to fabricate a polylactic acid (PLA) layer, a biodegradable polymer, using the electrospinning process. Comparison on the degradation trend of PLA layer and PP layer obtained from commercial 3-ply face mask (CFM) layer in seawater, river water, soil, and compost environment for a total of 60 days was observed. Results showed that the electrospinning method can produce PLA layers with similar thickness with current CFM layer, narrow distribution of fiber diameter, and slightly dense surface morphology comparable to the CFM. Synthesized PLA fiber layer shows 68.6%, 39.8%, and 415.7% improvement in tensile strength, Young’s modulus, and elongation at break, respectively, compared to CFM samples. Meanwhile, for the degradation study, PLA samples show more significant changes on its morphology corresponding to the degradation process that occurred on its fibers in the seawater, river water, and soil environment, whereas for the weight change study, only the soil environment shows significant changes after 45 days. In contrast, CFM samples did not show any significant changes corresponding to degradation activity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9945838 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | The Korean Fiber Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99458382023-02-23 Comparison of Physical Properties and Degradation of Polylactic Acid and Polypropylene Facemask Layer Fakhri, M. Amirul Mariatti, M. Vilay, V. Todo, M. Fibers Polym Regular Article The current 3-ply facemasks are produced mostly using polypropylene (PP) as the main plastic layer that is a non-biodegradable polymer. The objective of this study was to fabricate a polylactic acid (PLA) layer, a biodegradable polymer, using the electrospinning process. Comparison on the degradation trend of PLA layer and PP layer obtained from commercial 3-ply face mask (CFM) layer in seawater, river water, soil, and compost environment for a total of 60 days was observed. Results showed that the electrospinning method can produce PLA layers with similar thickness with current CFM layer, narrow distribution of fiber diameter, and slightly dense surface morphology comparable to the CFM. Synthesized PLA fiber layer shows 68.6%, 39.8%, and 415.7% improvement in tensile strength, Young’s modulus, and elongation at break, respectively, compared to CFM samples. Meanwhile, for the degradation study, PLA samples show more significant changes on its morphology corresponding to the degradation process that occurred on its fibers in the seawater, river water, and soil environment, whereas for the weight change study, only the soil environment shows significant changes after 45 days. In contrast, CFM samples did not show any significant changes corresponding to degradation activity. The Korean Fiber Society 2023-02-22 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9945838/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12221-023-00051-9 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to the Korean Fiber Society 2023, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Regular Article Fakhri, M. Amirul Mariatti, M. Vilay, V. Todo, M. Comparison of Physical Properties and Degradation of Polylactic Acid and Polypropylene Facemask Layer |
title | Comparison of Physical Properties and Degradation of Polylactic Acid and Polypropylene Facemask Layer |
title_full | Comparison of Physical Properties and Degradation of Polylactic Acid and Polypropylene Facemask Layer |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Physical Properties and Degradation of Polylactic Acid and Polypropylene Facemask Layer |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Physical Properties and Degradation of Polylactic Acid and Polypropylene Facemask Layer |
title_short | Comparison of Physical Properties and Degradation of Polylactic Acid and Polypropylene Facemask Layer |
title_sort | comparison of physical properties and degradation of polylactic acid and polypropylene facemask layer |
topic | Regular Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9945838/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12221-023-00051-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fakhrimamirul comparisonofphysicalpropertiesanddegradationofpolylacticacidandpolypropylenefacemasklayer AT mariattim comparisonofphysicalpropertiesanddegradationofpolylacticacidandpolypropylenefacemasklayer AT vilayv comparisonofphysicalpropertiesanddegradationofpolylacticacidandpolypropylenefacemasklayer AT todom comparisonofphysicalpropertiesanddegradationofpolylacticacidandpolypropylenefacemasklayer |