Cargando…

Narrative Review of Drug-Associated Nail Toxicities in Oncologic Patients

INTRODUCTION: Nail toxicity represents one of the most common cutaneous adverse effects of both classic chemotherapeutic agents and new oncologic drugs, including targeted treatments and immunotherapy. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to provide a comprehensive literature review of nail toxicities derived from...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Emvalomati, Anastasia, Oflidou, Valentina, Papageorgiou, Chryssoula, Kemanetzi, Christina, Giannouli, Maria, Kalloniati, Evangelia, Efthymiadis, Konstantinos, Koukoutzeli, Chrysanthi, Timotheadou, Eleni, Trigoni, Anastasia, Patsatsi, Aikaterini, Lazaridou, Elizabeth, Apalla, Zoe, Trakatelli, Myrto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mattioli 1885 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9946059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36892360
http://dx.doi.org/10.5826/dpc.1301a64
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: Nail toxicity represents one of the most common cutaneous adverse effects of both classic chemotherapeutic agents and new oncologic drugs, including targeted treatments and immunotherapy. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to provide a comprehensive literature review of nail toxicities derived from conventional chemotherapeutic agents, targeted therapies (EGFR inhibitors, multikinase inhibitors, BRAF and MEK inhibitors) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), including clinical presentation, implicated drugs and approaches for prevention and management. METHODS: Retrieved literature from PubMed registry database was reviewed to include all articles published up to May 2021 relevant to the clinical presentation, diagnosis, incidence, prevention, and treatment of oncologic treatment-induced nail toxicity. The internet was searched for relevant studies. RESULTS: A wide spectrum of nail toxicities is associated with both, conventional and newer anticancer agents. The frequency of nail involvement, especially with immunotherapy and new targeted agents remains unknown and patients with different cancer types receiving different regimens may develop the same nail disorder, whereas patients with the same type of cancer under the same chemotherapeutic treatment may develop different types of nail alterations. The underlying mechanisms of the varying individual susceptibility and the diverse nail responses to various anticancer treatments need further investigation. CONCLUSION: Early recognition and treatment of nail toxicities can minimize their impact, allowing better adherence to conventional and newer oncologic treatments. Dermatologists, oncologists and other implicated physicians should be aware of these burdensome adverse effects in order to guide management and prevent impairment of patients’ quality of life.