Cargando…
Do we really measure what we think we are measuring?
Tests used in the empirical sciences are often (implicitly) assumed to be representative of a given research question in the sense that similar tests should lead to similar results. Here, we show that this assumption is not always valid. We illustrate our argument with the example of resting-state e...
Autores principales: | Gordillo, Dario, Ramos da Cruz, Janir, Moreno, Dana, Garobbio, Simona, Herzog, Michael H. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9947309/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36844457 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.106017 |
Ejemplares similares
-
COVID-19 and cancer: do we really know what we think we know?
por: Robinson, Andrew G., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Taking titles and naming names - who do we really think we are?
por: Bacon, Dawn
Publicado: (2015) -
Validity of polygenic risk scores: are we measuring what we think we are?
por: Janssens, A Cecile J W
Publicado: (2019) -
Preoperative anxiety: what are we really doing?
por: Buonanno, Pasquale, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Pyorrhea Alveolaris—What Do We Really Know of It
por: Trueman, W. H.
Publicado: (1897)