Cargando…

Procedural outcomes of laparoscopic caudate lobe resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

A systematic review was conducted in compliance with PRISMA statement standards to identify all studies reporting outcomes of laparoscopic resection of benign or malignant lesions located in caudate lobe of liver. Pooled outcome data were calculated using random-effects models. A total of 196 patien...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hajibandeh, Shahab, Kotb, Ahmed, Evans, Louis, Sams, Emily, Naguib, Andrew, Hajibandeh, Shahin, Satyadas, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Association of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9947369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36245071
http://dx.doi.org/10.14701/ahbps.22-045
_version_ 1784892537437159424
author Hajibandeh, Shahab
Kotb, Ahmed
Evans, Louis
Sams, Emily
Naguib, Andrew
Hajibandeh, Shahin
Satyadas, Thomas
author_facet Hajibandeh, Shahab
Kotb, Ahmed
Evans, Louis
Sams, Emily
Naguib, Andrew
Hajibandeh, Shahin
Satyadas, Thomas
author_sort Hajibandeh, Shahab
collection PubMed
description A systematic review was conducted in compliance with PRISMA statement standards to identify all studies reporting outcomes of laparoscopic resection of benign or malignant lesions located in caudate lobe of liver. Pooled outcome data were calculated using random-effects models. A total of 196 patients from 12 studies were included. Mean operative time, volume of intraoperative blood loss, and length of hospital stay were 225 minutes (95% confidence interval [CI], 181–269 minutes), 134 mL (95% CI, 85–184 mL), and 7 days (95% CI, 5–9 days), respectively. The pooled risk of need for intraoperative transfusion was 2% (95% CI, 0%–5%). It was 3% (95% CI, 1%–6%) for conversion to open surgery, 6% (95% CI, 0%–19%) for need for intra-abdominal drain, 1% (95% CI, 0%–3%) for postoperative mortality, 2% (95% CI, 0%–4%) for biliary leakage, 2% (95% CI, 0%–4%) for intra-abdominal abscess, 1% (95% CI, 0%–4%) for biliary stenosis, 1% (95% CI, 0%–3%) for postoperative bleeding, 1% (95% CI, 0%–4%) for pancreatic fistula, 2% (95% CI, 1%–5%) for pulmonary complications, 1% (95% CI, 0%–4%) for paralytic ileus, and 1% (95% CI, 0%–4%) for need for reoperation. Although the available evidence is limited, the findings of the current study might be utilized for hypothesis synthesis in future studies. They can be used to inform surgeons and patients about estimated risks of perioperative complications until a higher level of evidence is available.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9947369
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The Korean Association of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99473692023-02-24 Procedural outcomes of laparoscopic caudate lobe resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis Hajibandeh, Shahab Kotb, Ahmed Evans, Louis Sams, Emily Naguib, Andrew Hajibandeh, Shahin Satyadas, Thomas Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg Review Article A systematic review was conducted in compliance with PRISMA statement standards to identify all studies reporting outcomes of laparoscopic resection of benign or malignant lesions located in caudate lobe of liver. Pooled outcome data were calculated using random-effects models. A total of 196 patients from 12 studies were included. Mean operative time, volume of intraoperative blood loss, and length of hospital stay were 225 minutes (95% confidence interval [CI], 181–269 minutes), 134 mL (95% CI, 85–184 mL), and 7 days (95% CI, 5–9 days), respectively. The pooled risk of need for intraoperative transfusion was 2% (95% CI, 0%–5%). It was 3% (95% CI, 1%–6%) for conversion to open surgery, 6% (95% CI, 0%–19%) for need for intra-abdominal drain, 1% (95% CI, 0%–3%) for postoperative mortality, 2% (95% CI, 0%–4%) for biliary leakage, 2% (95% CI, 0%–4%) for intra-abdominal abscess, 1% (95% CI, 0%–4%) for biliary stenosis, 1% (95% CI, 0%–3%) for postoperative bleeding, 1% (95% CI, 0%–4%) for pancreatic fistula, 2% (95% CI, 1%–5%) for pulmonary complications, 1% (95% CI, 0%–4%) for paralytic ileus, and 1% (95% CI, 0%–4%) for need for reoperation. Although the available evidence is limited, the findings of the current study might be utilized for hypothesis synthesis in future studies. They can be used to inform surgeons and patients about estimated risks of perioperative complications until a higher level of evidence is available. The Korean Association of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery 2023-02-28 2022-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9947369/ /pubmed/36245071 http://dx.doi.org/10.14701/ahbps.22-045 Text en Copyright © 2023 by The Korean Association of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Hajibandeh, Shahab
Kotb, Ahmed
Evans, Louis
Sams, Emily
Naguib, Andrew
Hajibandeh, Shahin
Satyadas, Thomas
Procedural outcomes of laparoscopic caudate lobe resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Procedural outcomes of laparoscopic caudate lobe resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Procedural outcomes of laparoscopic caudate lobe resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Procedural outcomes of laparoscopic caudate lobe resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Procedural outcomes of laparoscopic caudate lobe resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Procedural outcomes of laparoscopic caudate lobe resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort procedural outcomes of laparoscopic caudate lobe resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9947369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36245071
http://dx.doi.org/10.14701/ahbps.22-045
work_keys_str_mv AT hajibandehshahab proceduraloutcomesoflaparoscopiccaudateloberesectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kotbahmed proceduraloutcomesoflaparoscopiccaudateloberesectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT evanslouis proceduraloutcomesoflaparoscopiccaudateloberesectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT samsemily proceduraloutcomesoflaparoscopiccaudateloberesectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT naguibandrew proceduraloutcomesoflaparoscopiccaudateloberesectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hajibandehshahin proceduraloutcomesoflaparoscopiccaudateloberesectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT satyadasthomas proceduraloutcomesoflaparoscopiccaudateloberesectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis