Cargando…

Additively manufactured polyether ether ketone (PEEK) skull implant as an alternative to titanium mesh in cranioplasty

173Cranioplasty is used for skull defects, involving lifting the scalp and restoring the contour of the skull with the original skull piece, titanium mesh, or solid biomaterial. Additive manufacturing (AM) technology, known as three-dimensional (3D) printing, is now utilized by medical professionals...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Jiaqi, Su, Yanwen, Rao, Xiao, Pang, Huanhao, Zhu, Hui, Liu, Liang, Chen, Ligang, Li, Dichen, He, Jiankang, Peng, Jianhua, Jiang, Yong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Whioce Publishing Pte. Ltd. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9947379/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36844244
http://dx.doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i1.634
_version_ 1784892539887681536
author Zhang, Jiaqi
Su, Yanwen
Rao, Xiao
Pang, Huanhao
Zhu, Hui
Liu, Liang
Chen, Ligang
Li, Dichen
He, Jiankang
Peng, Jianhua
Jiang, Yong
author_facet Zhang, Jiaqi
Su, Yanwen
Rao, Xiao
Pang, Huanhao
Zhu, Hui
Liu, Liang
Chen, Ligang
Li, Dichen
He, Jiankang
Peng, Jianhua
Jiang, Yong
author_sort Zhang, Jiaqi
collection PubMed
description 173Cranioplasty is used for skull defects, involving lifting the scalp and restoring the contour of the skull with the original skull piece, titanium mesh, or solid biomaterial. Additive manufacturing (AM) technology, known as three-dimensional (3D) printing, is now utilized by medical professionals to develop customized replicas of tissues, organs and bones, offering a valid option with perfect anatomic fitting in the individual and skeletal reconstruction. Here, we report a case that underwent titanium mesh cranioplasty 15 years ago. The poor appearance of the titanium mesh weakened the left eyebrow arch and resulted in the formation of a sinus tract. Cranioplasty was performed using an additively manufactured polyether ether ketone (PEEK) skull implant. PEEK skull implants have been successfully implanted without any complications. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of direct use of fused filament fabrication (FFF)-fabricated PEEK implant for cranial repair. The FFF-printed PEEK customized skull implant could possess simultaneously with adjustable material thickness and more complex structure, tunable mechanical properties, and low processing costs compared with traditional manufacturing processes. While meeting clinical needs, this production method is an appropriate alternative for promoting the use of PEEK materials in cranioplasty.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9947379
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Whioce Publishing Pte. Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99473792023-02-24 Additively manufactured polyether ether ketone (PEEK) skull implant as an alternative to titanium mesh in cranioplasty Zhang, Jiaqi Su, Yanwen Rao, Xiao Pang, Huanhao Zhu, Hui Liu, Liang Chen, Ligang Li, Dichen He, Jiankang Peng, Jianhua Jiang, Yong Int J Bioprint Clinical Case Study 173Cranioplasty is used for skull defects, involving lifting the scalp and restoring the contour of the skull with the original skull piece, titanium mesh, or solid biomaterial. Additive manufacturing (AM) technology, known as three-dimensional (3D) printing, is now utilized by medical professionals to develop customized replicas of tissues, organs and bones, offering a valid option with perfect anatomic fitting in the individual and skeletal reconstruction. Here, we report a case that underwent titanium mesh cranioplasty 15 years ago. The poor appearance of the titanium mesh weakened the left eyebrow arch and resulted in the formation of a sinus tract. Cranioplasty was performed using an additively manufactured polyether ether ketone (PEEK) skull implant. PEEK skull implants have been successfully implanted without any complications. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of direct use of fused filament fabrication (FFF)-fabricated PEEK implant for cranial repair. The FFF-printed PEEK customized skull implant could possess simultaneously with adjustable material thickness and more complex structure, tunable mechanical properties, and low processing costs compared with traditional manufacturing processes. While meeting clinical needs, this production method is an appropriate alternative for promoting the use of PEEK materials in cranioplasty. Whioce Publishing Pte. Ltd. 2022-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9947379/ /pubmed/36844244 http://dx.doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i1.634 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Zhang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Case Study
Zhang, Jiaqi
Su, Yanwen
Rao, Xiao
Pang, Huanhao
Zhu, Hui
Liu, Liang
Chen, Ligang
Li, Dichen
He, Jiankang
Peng, Jianhua
Jiang, Yong
Additively manufactured polyether ether ketone (PEEK) skull implant as an alternative to titanium mesh in cranioplasty
title Additively manufactured polyether ether ketone (PEEK) skull implant as an alternative to titanium mesh in cranioplasty
title_full Additively manufactured polyether ether ketone (PEEK) skull implant as an alternative to titanium mesh in cranioplasty
title_fullStr Additively manufactured polyether ether ketone (PEEK) skull implant as an alternative to titanium mesh in cranioplasty
title_full_unstemmed Additively manufactured polyether ether ketone (PEEK) skull implant as an alternative to titanium mesh in cranioplasty
title_short Additively manufactured polyether ether ketone (PEEK) skull implant as an alternative to titanium mesh in cranioplasty
title_sort additively manufactured polyether ether ketone (peek) skull implant as an alternative to titanium mesh in cranioplasty
topic Clinical Case Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9947379/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36844244
http://dx.doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i1.634
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangjiaqi additivelymanufacturedpolyetheretherketonepeekskullimplantasanalternativetotitaniummeshincranioplasty
AT suyanwen additivelymanufacturedpolyetheretherketonepeekskullimplantasanalternativetotitaniummeshincranioplasty
AT raoxiao additivelymanufacturedpolyetheretherketonepeekskullimplantasanalternativetotitaniummeshincranioplasty
AT panghuanhao additivelymanufacturedpolyetheretherketonepeekskullimplantasanalternativetotitaniummeshincranioplasty
AT zhuhui additivelymanufacturedpolyetheretherketonepeekskullimplantasanalternativetotitaniummeshincranioplasty
AT liuliang additivelymanufacturedpolyetheretherketonepeekskullimplantasanalternativetotitaniummeshincranioplasty
AT chenligang additivelymanufacturedpolyetheretherketonepeekskullimplantasanalternativetotitaniummeshincranioplasty
AT lidichen additivelymanufacturedpolyetheretherketonepeekskullimplantasanalternativetotitaniummeshincranioplasty
AT hejiankang additivelymanufacturedpolyetheretherketonepeekskullimplantasanalternativetotitaniummeshincranioplasty
AT pengjianhua additivelymanufacturedpolyetheretherketonepeekskullimplantasanalternativetotitaniummeshincranioplasty
AT jiangyong additivelymanufacturedpolyetheretherketonepeekskullimplantasanalternativetotitaniummeshincranioplasty