Cargando…

Electronic health records in nursing from 2000 to 2020: A bibliometric analysis

BACKGROUND: Electronic health records (EHR) is the longitudinal data generated by patients in medical institutions and recorded by electronic medical information systems in the form of digital, which is also the most widespread application of big data in medicine. The purpose of this study was to ex...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luan, Ze, Zhang, Zhiru, Gao, Yanan, Du, Shiyuan, Wu, Nan, Chen, Yulu, Peng, Xin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9947559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36844821
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1049411
_version_ 1784892582335086592
author Luan, Ze
Zhang, Zhiru
Gao, Yanan
Du, Shiyuan
Wu, Nan
Chen, Yulu
Peng, Xin
author_facet Luan, Ze
Zhang, Zhiru
Gao, Yanan
Du, Shiyuan
Wu, Nan
Chen, Yulu
Peng, Xin
author_sort Luan, Ze
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Electronic health records (EHR) is the longitudinal data generated by patients in medical institutions and recorded by electronic medical information systems in the form of digital, which is also the most widespread application of big data in medicine. The purpose of this study was to explore the application of electronic health records in the field of nursing and determine the current research status and hotspots. METHODS: A bibliometric analysis of electronic health records in nursing was undertaken from 2000 to 2020. The literature comes from Web of Science Core Collection database. We used CiteSpace (version 5.7 R5; Drexel University), which is a Java-based software that especially visualized collaborative networks and research topics. RESULTS: A total of 2616 publications were included in the study. We found that publications increased year by year. The Journal of American Medical Informatics Association (n = 921) is the most cited. The United States (n = 1,738) has the most publications in this field. University Penn (n = 63) is the institution with the most publications. There is no influential cooperation network among the authors, of which Bates, David W (n = 12) have the largest number of publications. The relevant publications also focus on the fields of health care science and services, and medical informatics. In keywords, EHR, long-term care, mobile application, inpatient falls, and advance care planning has been researching hotspots in recent years. CONCLUSION: With the popularization of information systems, the publications of EHR in the nursing field have increased year by year. This study provides the basic structure, potential cooperation, and research trends of EHR in the field of nursing from 2000 to 2020, and provides a reference for nurses to effectively use EHR to help clinical work or scientific researchers explore the potential significances of EHR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9947559
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99475592023-02-24 Electronic health records in nursing from 2000 to 2020: A bibliometric analysis Luan, Ze Zhang, Zhiru Gao, Yanan Du, Shiyuan Wu, Nan Chen, Yulu Peng, Xin Front Public Health Public Health BACKGROUND: Electronic health records (EHR) is the longitudinal data generated by patients in medical institutions and recorded by electronic medical information systems in the form of digital, which is also the most widespread application of big data in medicine. The purpose of this study was to explore the application of electronic health records in the field of nursing and determine the current research status and hotspots. METHODS: A bibliometric analysis of electronic health records in nursing was undertaken from 2000 to 2020. The literature comes from Web of Science Core Collection database. We used CiteSpace (version 5.7 R5; Drexel University), which is a Java-based software that especially visualized collaborative networks and research topics. RESULTS: A total of 2616 publications were included in the study. We found that publications increased year by year. The Journal of American Medical Informatics Association (n = 921) is the most cited. The United States (n = 1,738) has the most publications in this field. University Penn (n = 63) is the institution with the most publications. There is no influential cooperation network among the authors, of which Bates, David W (n = 12) have the largest number of publications. The relevant publications also focus on the fields of health care science and services, and medical informatics. In keywords, EHR, long-term care, mobile application, inpatient falls, and advance care planning has been researching hotspots in recent years. CONCLUSION: With the popularization of information systems, the publications of EHR in the nursing field have increased year by year. This study provides the basic structure, potential cooperation, and research trends of EHR in the field of nursing from 2000 to 2020, and provides a reference for nurses to effectively use EHR to help clinical work or scientific researchers explore the potential significances of EHR. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9947559/ /pubmed/36844821 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1049411 Text en Copyright © 2023 Luan, Zhang, Gao, Du, Wu, Chen and Peng. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Luan, Ze
Zhang, Zhiru
Gao, Yanan
Du, Shiyuan
Wu, Nan
Chen, Yulu
Peng, Xin
Electronic health records in nursing from 2000 to 2020: A bibliometric analysis
title Electronic health records in nursing from 2000 to 2020: A bibliometric analysis
title_full Electronic health records in nursing from 2000 to 2020: A bibliometric analysis
title_fullStr Electronic health records in nursing from 2000 to 2020: A bibliometric analysis
title_full_unstemmed Electronic health records in nursing from 2000 to 2020: A bibliometric analysis
title_short Electronic health records in nursing from 2000 to 2020: A bibliometric analysis
title_sort electronic health records in nursing from 2000 to 2020: a bibliometric analysis
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9947559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36844821
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1049411
work_keys_str_mv AT luanze electronichealthrecordsinnursingfrom2000to2020abibliometricanalysis
AT zhangzhiru electronichealthrecordsinnursingfrom2000to2020abibliometricanalysis
AT gaoyanan electronichealthrecordsinnursingfrom2000to2020abibliometricanalysis
AT dushiyuan electronichealthrecordsinnursingfrom2000to2020abibliometricanalysis
AT wunan electronichealthrecordsinnursingfrom2000to2020abibliometricanalysis
AT chenyulu electronichealthrecordsinnursingfrom2000to2020abibliometricanalysis
AT pengxin electronichealthrecordsinnursingfrom2000to2020abibliometricanalysis