Cargando…
Electronic health records in nursing from 2000 to 2020: A bibliometric analysis
BACKGROUND: Electronic health records (EHR) is the longitudinal data generated by patients in medical institutions and recorded by electronic medical information systems in the form of digital, which is also the most widespread application of big data in medicine. The purpose of this study was to ex...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9947559/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36844821 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1049411 |
_version_ | 1784892582335086592 |
---|---|
author | Luan, Ze Zhang, Zhiru Gao, Yanan Du, Shiyuan Wu, Nan Chen, Yulu Peng, Xin |
author_facet | Luan, Ze Zhang, Zhiru Gao, Yanan Du, Shiyuan Wu, Nan Chen, Yulu Peng, Xin |
author_sort | Luan, Ze |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Electronic health records (EHR) is the longitudinal data generated by patients in medical institutions and recorded by electronic medical information systems in the form of digital, which is also the most widespread application of big data in medicine. The purpose of this study was to explore the application of electronic health records in the field of nursing and determine the current research status and hotspots. METHODS: A bibliometric analysis of electronic health records in nursing was undertaken from 2000 to 2020. The literature comes from Web of Science Core Collection database. We used CiteSpace (version 5.7 R5; Drexel University), which is a Java-based software that especially visualized collaborative networks and research topics. RESULTS: A total of 2616 publications were included in the study. We found that publications increased year by year. The Journal of American Medical Informatics Association (n = 921) is the most cited. The United States (n = 1,738) has the most publications in this field. University Penn (n = 63) is the institution with the most publications. There is no influential cooperation network among the authors, of which Bates, David W (n = 12) have the largest number of publications. The relevant publications also focus on the fields of health care science and services, and medical informatics. In keywords, EHR, long-term care, mobile application, inpatient falls, and advance care planning has been researching hotspots in recent years. CONCLUSION: With the popularization of information systems, the publications of EHR in the nursing field have increased year by year. This study provides the basic structure, potential cooperation, and research trends of EHR in the field of nursing from 2000 to 2020, and provides a reference for nurses to effectively use EHR to help clinical work or scientific researchers explore the potential significances of EHR. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9947559 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99475592023-02-24 Electronic health records in nursing from 2000 to 2020: A bibliometric analysis Luan, Ze Zhang, Zhiru Gao, Yanan Du, Shiyuan Wu, Nan Chen, Yulu Peng, Xin Front Public Health Public Health BACKGROUND: Electronic health records (EHR) is the longitudinal data generated by patients in medical institutions and recorded by electronic medical information systems in the form of digital, which is also the most widespread application of big data in medicine. The purpose of this study was to explore the application of electronic health records in the field of nursing and determine the current research status and hotspots. METHODS: A bibliometric analysis of electronic health records in nursing was undertaken from 2000 to 2020. The literature comes from Web of Science Core Collection database. We used CiteSpace (version 5.7 R5; Drexel University), which is a Java-based software that especially visualized collaborative networks and research topics. RESULTS: A total of 2616 publications were included in the study. We found that publications increased year by year. The Journal of American Medical Informatics Association (n = 921) is the most cited. The United States (n = 1,738) has the most publications in this field. University Penn (n = 63) is the institution with the most publications. There is no influential cooperation network among the authors, of which Bates, David W (n = 12) have the largest number of publications. The relevant publications also focus on the fields of health care science and services, and medical informatics. In keywords, EHR, long-term care, mobile application, inpatient falls, and advance care planning has been researching hotspots in recent years. CONCLUSION: With the popularization of information systems, the publications of EHR in the nursing field have increased year by year. This study provides the basic structure, potential cooperation, and research trends of EHR in the field of nursing from 2000 to 2020, and provides a reference for nurses to effectively use EHR to help clinical work or scientific researchers explore the potential significances of EHR. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9947559/ /pubmed/36844821 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1049411 Text en Copyright © 2023 Luan, Zhang, Gao, Du, Wu, Chen and Peng. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Public Health Luan, Ze Zhang, Zhiru Gao, Yanan Du, Shiyuan Wu, Nan Chen, Yulu Peng, Xin Electronic health records in nursing from 2000 to 2020: A bibliometric analysis |
title | Electronic health records in nursing from 2000 to 2020: A bibliometric analysis |
title_full | Electronic health records in nursing from 2000 to 2020: A bibliometric analysis |
title_fullStr | Electronic health records in nursing from 2000 to 2020: A bibliometric analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Electronic health records in nursing from 2000 to 2020: A bibliometric analysis |
title_short | Electronic health records in nursing from 2000 to 2020: A bibliometric analysis |
title_sort | electronic health records in nursing from 2000 to 2020: a bibliometric analysis |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9947559/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36844821 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1049411 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT luanze electronichealthrecordsinnursingfrom2000to2020abibliometricanalysis AT zhangzhiru electronichealthrecordsinnursingfrom2000to2020abibliometricanalysis AT gaoyanan electronichealthrecordsinnursingfrom2000to2020abibliometricanalysis AT dushiyuan electronichealthrecordsinnursingfrom2000to2020abibliometricanalysis AT wunan electronichealthrecordsinnursingfrom2000to2020abibliometricanalysis AT chenyulu electronichealthrecordsinnursingfrom2000to2020abibliometricanalysis AT pengxin electronichealthrecordsinnursingfrom2000to2020abibliometricanalysis |